Home Archives Random Quotes Latest Comments Top 100 Submit Quote Search Log In

Quote# 88516

Tell me how and why an eyeball evolved. What came first, our immune systems or our need for an immune system? Could someone direct me to evidence of a single transitional fossil? No, not evidence of slight changes within a species, transitional fossils from one species to another. After all, there should be countless numbers of them. Please, someone give me the best 5 examples we see in nature today of something from one species that’s in the middle of turning into another. I’m not greedy, the top 5 will do. How about 1? Don’t tell me we just happen to be in a time in all the supposed billions of years of history that we can’t witness macroevolution happening. Lol.

Next time someone tells you you believe in fairy tales because you believe in the Bible tell them you’re not the one who believes a frog turns into a prince. Only evolutionists and 3-6 yr old girls believe that. :)

Hayride, Free Republic 55 Comments [7/24/2012 6:38:23 AM]
Fundie Index: 65
WTF?! || meh
Username:
Comment:



1 2 3
farpadokly

But, even if the theory of evolution is completely incorrect, that doesn't make the Christian explanation any more correct. In working so hard to disprove evolution, you haven't thereby proved anything about Christianity.

7/25/2012 12:20:47 PM



Wikipedia is a good start.

7/25/2012 5:58:43 PM

Wehpudicabok

Macroevolution is microevolution over long periods of time. There is no meaningful distinction between the two, which is why biologists don't use those terms; they're only used by retarded creationists (pardon the redundancy). Those "slight changes within a species" which you acknowledge to exist simply pile up until the original has become a new species - an entirely arbitrary distinction of human origin.

Every fossil is a transitional fossil because species are always evolving.

Even if Hayride were reading this, explaining this wouldn't do any good. If he (pardon the assumption of masculinity) had any curiosity about the world around him or any willingness to accept the possibility that the Bible isn't literally true, he would already know all this. Arguing with creationists is like arguing with infants.

Well, not entirely. Infants know nothing at all. Creationists know so much that's wrong, they would have to take extra time learning just to catch up to people starting with a blank slate. I say "would" because we all know they're never going to learn anyway.

7/25/2012 10:45:17 PM



"Could someone direct me to evidence of a single transitional fossil?
How about every fossil ever?

7/26/2012 12:39:18 AM

Seeker Lancer

Did it take you all day to come up with that joke?

There is no such thing as micro and macro evolution. Only evolution.

And try using the Internet to look up the answers to your questions instead of flailing blindly at strawmen. You'd be amazed. They used to call it the information super-highway for a reason.

7/29/2012 7:33:15 PM
1 2 3