Home Archives Random Quotes Latest Comments Top 100 Submit Quote Search Log In

Quote# 88542

The fact of the matter is, even then, and also now, women are still more important reproductively than men. In this world, it is not quite as necessary due to the immense numbers of the human species, but nevertheless, women are still the more important half.

For instance, if humanity were to undergo… say… a transformation of the short-term solutions sort. It would be sensible for 1-10% of the global population to remain male. For behavioral studies, and for reproductive purposes – a good example to remember is that it would require only one man to populate a city, while it would require an entire city of women for the same task. Women are more important because they bear the child, and thusly, they are needed in greater numbers.

If my short-term solutions were implemented, and men and boys were castrated in great numbers, it would make sense for some men to be able to be signed up through governmentally operated programs to become “Breeders” who would be exempted from castration until they were too old to continue producing viable sperm.

They would be used for sample collection based on supply-and-demand. This, along with the use of scientifically generated progeny, would be able to sustain a perfect population. Primarily female, and sufficiently - to the extent that it is necessary for sample collection - male.

Likewise, mothers or close female guardians would be advised to exempt their male children from castration if it were necessary on the basis of supply-and-demand. They could still go through with it, but they would be advised to not do so until the male grew older.

This practice of castration, Breeder usage, and sample collection would continue until it was scientifically possible to create female children entirely from the organic material of female adults. Then, the existence of men would no longer be necessary at all. Long-term solution implementation would follow.

Femitheist Divine, The New Era of Feminism 54 Comments [7/26/2012 3:39:34 AM]
Fundie Index: 58
WTF?! || meh
Username:
Comment:



1 2 3
LAchlan

I think you'd maybe castrate about 7 men before you had a rebellion on your hands, and you'd lose, cos we're stronger than you. Ha ha.

7/26/2012 10:31:13 AM

Skyknight

@Dionysos: Note the last paragraph, about being able to create female children solely from the organic material of women. In other words, whiptail-style cloning. I don't think she believes in the necessity of a gene pool. I have a hunch she'd like to abolish pregnancy in favor of cloning the perfect endlessly...

7/26/2012 10:39:12 AM

UHM

This remids me of really crappy porn

7/26/2012 10:53:04 AM

RW2

Apparently she killed herself a week or so ago.

http://www.departedngone.com/listing.php?lid=2642

I don't know if dogma leads to psychosis or psychotics are attracted to dogma....either way, it sure didn't help her situation.

7/26/2012 10:56:09 AM

Ludd

It's nice that their plan to combat sexism and oppression is by bringing about a society dedicated to sexism and oppression. Did I say nice? I meant psychotic.

7/26/2012 10:56:54 AM

Meishayuri

Snu Snu!

7/26/2012 11:04:16 AM

Liz

This sounds like atomic book I'm reading called "Y: the Last Man." it's a good book. Also, it IS possible to create children solely from female parents, but you need a laboratory.
To the heart of the matter: If men were taken away, I would miss my dad and brother. These people(sexists of both genders) can't seem to understand that the one gender is, in fact, just as human as the other.

7/26/2012 11:36:43 AM

checkmate

If my short-term solutions were implemented

Solutions? A solution requires a problem. So what's the problem?

Oh, yes, and you're a nutjob.

7/26/2012 12:38:30 PM

DarkfireTaimatsu

It's like Thundra, except without any of the likeable traits.

7/26/2012 12:54:25 PM

Renon

Well, scientifically speaking, it may be possible for two women to produce a child that is uniquely theirs, via manipulation of adult stem cells in bone marrow to create 'female sperm', and then create the fetus through a type of parthenogenesis.
But that's rather beside the point. Even if we reach the point where two women can have a child, that doesn't automatically mean that all men must be mutilated or killed.
In short, you're insane.

7/26/2012 1:09:30 PM

Blue the Thief

"The fact of the matter is, even then, and also now, women are still more important reproductively than men. In this world, it is not quite as necessary due to the immense numbers of the human species, but nevertheless, women are still the more important half."



You need both, stupid.

"For instance, if humanity were to undergo… say… a transformation of the short-term solutions sort. It would be sensible for 1-10% of the global population to remain male. For behavioral studies, and for reproductive purposes – a good example to remember is that it would require only one man to populate a city, while it would require an entire city of women for the same task. Women are more important because they bear the child, and thusly, they are needed in greater numbers."



You would hit the incest problem faster then you could say 'Oniichan~!'.

"If my short-term solutions were implemented, and men and boys were castrated in great numbers, it would make sense for some men to be able to be signed up through governmentally operated programs to become “Breeders” who would be exempted from castration until they were too old to continue producing viable sperm."



"They would be used for sample collection based on supply-and-demand. This, along with the use of scientifically generated progeny, would be able to sustain a perfect population. Primarily female, and sufficiently - to the extent that it is necessary for sample collection - male."


7/26/2012 2:14:32 PM

Blue the Thief

"Likewise, mothers or close female guardians would be advised to exempt their male children from castration if it were necessary on the basis of supply-and-demand. They could still go through with it, but they would be advised to not do so until the male grew older."



"This practice of castration, Breeder usage, and sample collection would continue until it was scientifically possible to create female children entirely from the organic material of female adults. Then, the existence of men would no longer be necessary at all. Long-term solution implementation would follow."


7/26/2012 2:15:08 PM

nobody

Imagine the panic realising she? is the woman you are dating

7/26/2012 5:06:06 PM

Blue the Thief

nobody

Imagine the panic realising she? is the woman you are dating.



7/26/2012 5:49:45 PM



What an utter imbecile...just accept you'll never get this disgusting dream of yours. Stew in the misery that your dystopia is one that will forever remain in your skull. Well, until someone does the world a favor and cracks that skull of yours.

7/26/2012 6:15:20 PM

Grimsoncrow

Well,I'm glad your dead now.You don't have to see the other half of human poulation and suffer anymore.

7/27/2012 3:34:21 AM

The Anonymous

If castration is okay, then so is female circumcision of the worst type.

That being said, this plan looks like the plot of some badly written science fiction villain. Try a bit harder.

7/27/2012 8:37:14 AM

HomelessWithCheese

Well aren't you just a wonderful bucket of crazy?

7/27/2012 1:18:06 PM

Wyzard

I wonder how she would have felt about collecting female eggs and the creation of an artificial womb?

7/27/2012 3:41:32 PM

Passerby

This is a Poe. Femitheist is well-established as a troll, most probably created by an MRA who couldn't find a sufficiently strawmanny feminist, so he built his own.

7/27/2012 7:10:34 PM

TheLastCenturion

as contrast, this would be about as offensive to women as THAT was to men.

why dont we just wait for women to turn eighteen, then harvest their ovaries for their eggs, then we can use a specifically engineered tank to replace the womb and grow new humans. because of the number of eggs a developed woman can carry, we would only need to sustain about a 10% female population. then we can do scientific research and find a way to breed using only male genetic material. then women would no longer be necessary at all! and then men could be happy because there are no batshit insane feminists suggesting we be wiped out!

7/28/2012 8:58:46 AM

Seeker Lancer

It's hard to laugh at these knowing she was truly insane and committed suicide. Her mind was a dark and troubled place.

7/29/2012 8:57:21 AM

Rastifan

Good grief. That gene pool would be as stable as a 5 dollar crack whore. The stupidity. It burns.

7/30/2012 2:25:55 AM



First of all, you fail biology forever.
Secondly, men are human beings, not a breeding stock, you sick... I don't even have a word for you

9/25/2012 6:48:08 AM

Philbert McAdamia

“Breeders” who would be exempted from castration until they were too old to continue producing viable sperm.

Then chop their nuts off?



Long-term solution implementation would follow.

The "Ultimate Solution". Jawohl.

9/25/2012 7:10:03 AM
1 2 3