Home Archives Random Quotes Latest Comments Top 100 Submit Quote Search Log In

Quote# 8856

i don't want to send hours learn it... but i want to know the so called facts...
i know to know why ppl belive in evolution...

evolution was started by a man who Married his cousin and had over 5 kids...

creation was started by a God that gave his son to die for men and lived a Perfect life

study on how close we are to Monkey ... prove that 1 type of Monkey had 98% in common wit humans

"we are 98% monkey and 2% human" lol

bluefish001, EvC Forum 34 Comments [1/4/2006 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
WTF?! || meh
Username:
Comment:



1 2
BigDaddyJ

What does over 5 kids mean?
30 is over 5 as much as 6 is.

1/4/2006 8:47:01 PM

BigDaddyJ

What does over 5 kids mean?
30 is over 5 as much as 6 is.

1/4/2006 8:47:02 PM

BigDaddyJ

What does over 5 kids mean?
30 is over 5 as much as 6 is.

1/4/2006 8:48:37 PM

BigDaddyJ

Sorry about all the dupes,must the 98% monkey in me.

1/4/2006 8:58:29 PM

Darth Wang

Ad hominems, misunderstanding of genetics, unfounded assumptions.

1/4/2006 9:01:26 PM

King Spirula

And just who did Cain or Able marry? And who did their kids marry? And how many sons did Issac have compared with Darwin...too many? Not enough? And no type of monkey (to date) has shown 98% homology with humans...but an ape (chimpanzee)shares at least that much...so yeah, we ARE 98% ape. Live with it.

1/4/2006 9:17:54 PM

Tiny Bulcher

\"we are 98% monkey and 2% human\" lol\"

Not to mention 20% banana. Fruit.

1/4/2006 10:00:48 PM

CousinTed

\"evolution was started by a man who Married his cousin and had over 5 kids...\"

This was, ironicly enough, probably how this mo's family was started.

1/4/2006 10:06:52 PM

Crosis

To know the facts, you would need to spend hours learning it. I could give you the executive summary, but you wouldn't get it.

<<< evolution was started by a man who Married his cousin and had over 5 kids... >>>

I don't know if this is true or not, but frankly it doesn't matter. The truth of a matter does not depend on the sexual activity of the one who first suggested it.

<<< creation was started by a God that gave his son to die for men and lived a Perfect life >>>

Evidence, please?

<<< study on how close we are to Monkey ... prove that 1 type of Monkey had 98% in common wit humans >>>

Not monkeys, chimpanzees. And yes, 98% of our DNA is common to both.

<<< \"we are 98% monkey and 2% human\" lol >>>

Nope, 100% human, there's just not that much difference between human and chimp (see our commander-in-chief for evidence).

1/4/2006 10:17:41 PM

The Last Conformist

Don't fundies normally think that having many kids is a good thing? Go forth and multiply and all that?

1/5/2006 12:02:42 AM

The Great Chuck Norris

the high percentage of DNA that is common in 2 different things has little to do with if something evovled from the other.

IN my Biology class, the book claims that humans and monkey share 95% of the same DNA, bananas and humans share 90% of DNA.

Also, on \"who wants to be a millionaire, one of the questions was \"What percentage of our DNA is Junk DNA (DNA that makes no difference), and the right answer was 95%.

However, last I checked, I was 100% human, this guy however I have my doubts.

1/5/2006 1:08:34 AM

Tindalos

You know, the sad thing is that if someone claimed to be devinely inspired to write the theory of Evolution, these guys would be more likely to belive... Believe he's been talking to a demon, but still.

1/5/2006 1:21:11 AM

glyptodon

King Spirula: I think that's \"100% ape,\" actually. ;) Though less than that in common with other ape species.

1/5/2006 2:56:46 PM

King Spirula

glyptodont
100% ape..agreed. I was trying to point out that only a small fraction of our DNA actually constitutes Homo sapien. Any one know what percent is bacteria?

1/5/2006 3:52:30 PM

Aesmael

Weird. Bluefish001 seems to be claiming that first God created the world, sent Jesus, etc. But later, Darwin came along and caused evolution to start happening. Perhaps He (Darwin) even reached back through time to unmake the literal truth of Genesis?

Sounds like a pretty potent fellow. Maybe we should be worshipping Him instead? Could be your answer, bluefish - people believe in evolution because its founder was more powerful than your god?

Outlandish speculation is fun! Of course, most people accept the theory of evolution because it is supported by the evidence.

1/5/2006 4:44:40 PM

ssdexecutor

Married his cousin!? Well, I never! That OBVIOUSLY disproves his scientific observations.

1/7/2006 9:12:34 AM

Manibeaux

Yes, I want to know the facts, but I don't want to spend hours learning them. Perhaps you can simply beam the facts directly into my brainpan?

1/8/2006 1:49:52 PM

Mr. Turquoise

Darwin may well have married his cousin (I can't be bothered to confirm/deny this), but Adam and Eve's kids had kids with each other (please show me where in Genesis it says that they didn't). That's just sick, dude - I'd much rather be descended from a chimpanzee.

Mr. Turquoise

1/8/2006 6:12:38 PM

sjc1963

No, The Great Chuck Norris, your textbook doesn't say that we share 95% the same DNA with monkeys. It does say that we share a common ancestor with the other apes. Apes are not monkeys. BTW, its around 65% DNA we share with bananas. That shows that if you go back far enough we share a common anestor with other forms of life as well. It actually proves evolution.

1/8/2006 10:17:02 PM

Goober

I think the police should have the power to crack down on people this stupid.

1/9/2006 2:51:17 AM

The Great Chuck Norris

Honestly, I just said what I heard in my biology class.

My biology Teacher can very well be wrong.

Also, I said monkies, but I meant animals closer to Chimps, Oragutangs (sp??), and Gibeons.

Honestly, IDK much about evolution.

1/9/2006 4:54:24 AM

sjc1963

Learn.

Creationists try to prove creationism by trying to disprove evolution.

Evolutionists prove evolution by showing the facts.

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-intro-to-biology.html

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/chance/chance.html

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/evolution-definition.html

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/evolution-fact.html

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-god.html

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-misconceptions.html

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/darwinism.html

1/10/2006 2:33:08 PM

Nyarlathotep

To The Great Chuck Norris: \"Also, on \"who wants to be a millionaire, one of the questions was \"What percentage of our DNA is Junk DNA (DNA that makes no difference), and the right answer was 95%.\" I have since sold my Gen Bio text back, so I can't reference it right now, but the current belief is that *no* DNA is junk, per se; it just doesn't necessarity code for any polypetides at a given time. I beleive that the current theory is that a fair amount of DNA is duplicating other information on the strand, to protect against environmental damage causing severe harm to the organism. Some of the chromosome is thought to deal with pre-programmed cell death, to keep cells from multiplying ad infinatum (a la cancer cells). If I am understanding everything correctly (bio majors: please correct me if I'm wrong!) there isn't any wasted DNA, because if it was truly useless, evolution would have already pruned it off.

1/13/2006 6:31:28 PM

Joe

\"evolution was started by a man who Married his cousin and had over 5 kids... \"

Christians (and every other religion) have been doing that for centuries.

1/13/2006 6:37:52 PM

g-21-lto

Um ...

No, just forget it. An explanation of logical fallacies and a discussion of the field of cladistics might just be beyond this guy.

1/13/2006 7:13:18 PM
1 2