@Leighton: you don't, in fact, have the right to arm yourself with an ICBM. getting permissions from the FAA alone for such a launch would be a royal PITA, never even mind any warhead to ride on the thing.
(fun fact: AFAIK nuclear weapons are probably the only class of weaponry that is actually outright illegal for U.S. citizens to own. everything else may be regulated out of all practicable legal ownership, and/or made too much of a hassle for anyone to get it in reality, but nukes are the only thing that's de jure illegal.)
much as i hate to say this, the only obviously kooky part of this one quote is where the kook implies the recent mass murder might have been any kind of "false flag operation". the rest is mostly surprisingly reasonable --- that public reports of the incident may not be entirely correct no matter what their source, that the perpetrator was likely a lone nutcase, and that the event will be exploited for political ends. really, none of that should be controversial.
the part about any UN treaty is likely wrong, but that can be considered details. that this tragedy is a convenient crisis that won't be left to go to waste is the main point, and likely entirely true.
...and really, people here claiming the <i>second amendment</i> was what killed people in this incident? honestly? i guess we should blame the first amendment for any instances of libel or slander, then, while we're at it. GET A GRIP.