1 2
#8882
Darth Wang
No, I really don't.
1/4/2006 8:56:40 PM
#8899
Just Rick
Once again we see the religious ignore anything that might contradict what they have been indoctrinated with. The simple idea that a woman is more than a homemaker is beyond their comprehension because they refuse to even think about it.
This reminds me of that commercial where David Spade tells his customers over and over \"No\". Doesn't matter if they have a valid point or not the answer is always no.
1/4/2006 9:34:11 PM
#8922
Dragon
... I don't want to meet the kind of woman that'd marry him.
1/4/2006 11:01:23 PM
#8923
Dragon
... I don't want to meet the kind of woman that'd marry him.
1/4/2006 11:01:43 PM
#8932
Polymerase
Um, if Clinton wasn't married, why would he *need* to legalize adultery?
And as an aside, does anyone even know whether adultery is considered criminally prosecutable these days?
1/4/2006 11:50:41 PM
#8937
David D.G.
Polymerase #9894
<< And as an aside, does anyone even know whether adultery is considered criminally prosecutable these days? >>
---------------------
No, it is not -- at least, not in the United States. I wish to heck there were some way of prosecuting cheating spouses for their behavior, but there seems to be no support for the idea.
~David D.G.
1/4/2006 11:59:06 PM
#8944
Bum
I'm trying to imagine Reagan if he wasn't married. Considering that he was senile for the last few years of holding office and his wife pretty much ran everything anyways, it's not a pretty picture.
If anything, I daresay that presidency is good proof that a woman CAN run the nation, since Nancy did do all the work.
1/5/2006 12:07:48 AM
#8967
Nekhbet
Remember; A woman's place is in the House, the Senate and eventually the Oval Office, I'm sure we couldn't fuck it up any worse than the guys have. BTW I think Nancy Reagan had the help of the best astrologer money could buy to help her run the country when Ronnie was incapacitated
1/5/2006 1:42:07 AM
#9027
glyptodon
Polymerase: Haha, good call.
Ummm, so he could cheat with married women?
1/5/2006 3:07:49 PM
#9204
Ted
<i>I wish to heck there were some way of prosecuting cheating spouses for their behavior, but there seems to be no support for the idea.</i>
No, you don't. You really, really don't. It opens the legal door for government ability to determine when a person can have sex, and with whom.
Government must never again be allowed back into anyone consenting adults' bedroom under any circumstance after Lawrence v. Texas.
1/6/2006 10:53:56 PM
#9353
roadrunner570
I'm a Christian, and was raised with some of these same beliefs, but after some good time in prayer and studying the Bible, I do not get this whole inferior woman thing at all. If anyone has read the book of Luke, Jesus elevates women to a level equal to men at least, something not even heard of for that region at that time. So I'm not sure how so many modern Christians manage to get this inferiority thing from it.
1/8/2006 12:23:40 AM
#9661
TDR
Alastair - fuck off, you nong.
1/9/2006 9:32:06 PM
#10450
Joe
Misogynists can't stand the thought of having a woman above them in any way.
1/13/2006 7:08:40 PM
#10574
g-21-lto
>>Misogynists can't stand the thought of having a woman above them in any way.<<
A shame, since the guys I'm above generally seem to like it.
>>But I hope you get my point<<
After reading back over your post a few times, no, I really don't.
1/14/2006 5:42:53 PM
#10687
Bob Blablah
Learn to spell. Please?
1/15/2006 7:33:51 PM
#10758
ez-c
If Reagan wasn't married, he might not have used Nancy's personal astrologer to make his important decisions for him.
1/16/2006 4:36:39 AM
#10793
David D.G.
Ted #10182
<< <i>I wish to heck there were some way of prosecuting cheating spouses for their behavior, but there seems to be no support for the idea.</i>
No, you don't. You really, really don't. It opens the legal door for government ability to determine when a person can have sex, and with whom.
Government must never again be allowed back into anyone consenting adults' bedroom under any circumstance after Lawrence v. Texas. >>
----------------------
(*sigh*) Yeah, I guess you're right.
It bugs me, though. Cheaters deserve punishment of some kind (preferably, in my opinion, severe).
~David D.G.
1/16/2006 4:18:31 PM
#10804
WritingIsMyReligion
Give us the House, Senate, and the White House. I'm sure we couldn't frig it up any worse than it already is, thanks to some white male Republicans...
1/16/2006 5:03:01 PM
#11080
Mimi
Read your Bible: In the OT Deborah was a judge and prophetess in Israel. Moron.
1/18/2006 5:30:59 PM
#112335
SaneChick
Hey, dipshit, adultry is legal.
Personally, I'd like to institute a minimum IQ for the presidency, but that isn't going to happen either.
11/30/2006 9:26:58 PM
#570677
Marlowe
Wait... does this guy believe Reagan was still making movies as president?
WOW.
7/3/2008 11:19:17 AM
#570772
Delirium
@ Mimi
Don't forget Phoebe, who was mentioned in one of Paul's letters.
Also, there have been plenty of great women leaders throughout history. Has this guy ever heard of Theodora (who was a Christian) or Boudicca?
7/3/2008 1:25:52 PM
#1364111
Too late for Margaret Tatcher, I guess. And men or women who hold positions of power are adviced by wise people, of course, AND they need supportive spouses, no doubt, but that´s not essential. It´s they who take decisions. And maybe, just maybe, if you learned to spell, you´d have more credibility. However.............
1/7/2012 10:21:54 AM
#1364133
Joker
I do wonder what Alastair thinks of Margaret Thatcher, the Iron Lady, close friend to Reagan and one of the most prominent conservative figures of the 20th century, or is she a special case?
1/7/2012 10:59:30 AM
#1364770
Canadiest
"He might have tried to incorprate his job into all his movies"
Methinks this guy thinks Ronald Reagan the actor was in the same time frame as Ronald Reagan, President. The president signed in three bills today while on the set of "Bonzo Lobbies for the Banana industry".
"Clinton might have tried to legalize adultry"
There's no law against it, no fines or incartiration applicable however it is a breach of trust under the marriage contract, usable only by the spouse.
1/9/2012 8:39:28 AM
1 2