Home Archives Random Quotes Latest Comments Top 100 Submit Quote Search Log In

Quote# 88911

It is not a question of IQ. Women in general are short-minded, their intelligence is tactical and nursing (focused on behaviorism and human relations) compared to men's. Men are far-minded, strategic and hierarchical. There are few women in the "movement" for the same reason they are less negative to multiculturalism than men - they don't see the big picture and they DON'T CARE ABOUT THE FUTURE. Having children is a very immediate experience, and the liberal "love", which is altogether womanly, is also concerned with TODAY's suffering, saving everyone NOW, no matter if twice as many people will starve in a generation.

The death of the white race is intimately tied to the death of manly virtues. Feminism wants to reverse the gender roles, now women should be hierarchical and decision makers in the career game - let someone else worry about having children (why not the Africans, after all, they are equal and their children will be as capable to carry on society...right?). Little do they understand how utterly empty the male struggle for power in the hierarchy is, outside of its ultimate evolutionary purpose to get females. But future population size depends on the number of wombs. The number of men doesn't matter. We men are nearly worthless, but a woman who has children is invaluable. Men will never take career women seriously, because their potential for self-fulfillment as mothers is infinitely greater than in the status game that men play TO DOMINATE EACH OTHER. Today's women want all the advantages (equal pay, "respect", being able to sleep around without stigma) but none of the responsibility.

Feminism is evil. It must be rooted out before it roots itself out - when all remaining women are under tribal or sharia law.

You should ask yourself what the main mission in life for a Negro or Muslim woman is. It's having children, and they are breeding us out of existence for that very reason. This prevailing conservatism, the bourgeois hope for prosperity, career, status and security, with maybe one or two children when it's convenient, is one of the biggest threats to white survival.

Aquilifer, Stormfront 19 Comments [8/12/2012 4:59:19 AM]
Fundie Index: 20
Submitted By: Sergeant343
WTF?! || meh
Username:
Comment:



1


Conservative: You have freedom, so you ought to give it up, or (insert fear mongering here).

8/12/2012 5:29:10 AM

Percy Q. Shunn


8/12/2012 6:57:58 AM

SpukiKitty

Seeing the way the world is, we could use more of those so-called "womanly" attributes of nurturing, sharing & love.

Sexism, Ethnicism, Kyriarchy...FTL!

To all forms of bigotry & of Kyriarchy, I say this , from the bottom of my heart, the wisdom of Monty Python....

"I fart in your general direction!"


8/12/2012 7:29:01 AM

fishtank

Well thank you for your contribution, Aqu, if you'd just step off this FUCKING CLIFF we could all enjoy our evening..

8/12/2012 8:11:32 AM

Matante

Having children doesn't require long-term planning now?

8/12/2012 9:40:45 AM

J. James

Oh, for the love of Pete. This "outbreeding" bullshit again? Look, it's not like they have a larger birthrate because they're more fecund than white women, it's because POOR PEOPLE HAVE MORE BABIES. Simple as that.

For instance: my white great-grandmother is a poor depression-era woman who lived on a ranch earlier in her life. She has given birth fourteen times. My relatively affluent aunt? Just twice.

That's the long and short of it. No genetic differences, no change in fecundity, certainly no long-game "reproduce & conquer" strategy, just simple economics.

8/12/2012 9:51:40 AM

nazani14

There are few women in the "movement"
Gosh, I can't imagine why.

8/12/2012 10:55:52 AM

Balthazar The Wise

Well, for what it's worth, if the global warming people are right and we're fucking this planet beyond all repair, they won't have anything to worry about much longer.

8/12/2012 3:02:04 PM

Ebon

We so need a Sexists Say section.

8/12/2012 4:22:26 PM

Sergeant343

Wise, actually we still have hundreds of years before the ice caps melt at current rates, so we have a long ass time.

8/12/2012 4:36:31 PM

Reynardine

This entry deserves not only RSTDT, CTSTDT, & FSTDT, but SSTDT. Especially the latter...so when will we have one?

8/12/2012 6:23:04 PM

Reynardine

No, Sergeant, the rate is *accellerating*, and Florida, the Maldives, Delaware, and the Padma delta do not have a long-ass time.

8/12/2012 6:27:34 PM

armogohma

I never thought I'd see the phrase "men are nearly worthless" in a misogynist rant.

8/12/2012 10:32:43 PM

Sergeant343

Reynardine here is my proof that the ice sheets are not going to melt any time soon and no credible Climate scientist is saying it is going to happen any time soon, so cite your sources. The rise is predicted to be less than the 20 feet Al Gore claimed.
"Threatened loss of Greenland ice-sheet"
J.M. Gregory et al Nature 428, 616(8 April 2008)
"Modelling West Antarctic ice sheet growth and collapse through the past fie million years"
David Pollard & Robert M DeConto Nature 458, 329-362(19 March 2009)

Sea levels may be rising by 3 mm a year and only a half century ago it was 1.8 mm a year, but melting ice is not the main cause of the increase, for more than half the rise is because of a principle of physics called thermal expansion(meaning because the oceans are getting hotter).
"Thermal expansion in ocean and coupled general circulation models"
D.R.Jackett at al American Meteorological Society, 2000 vol. 13 no8, pp. 1384-1405
"Improved estimates of upper-ocean warming and multi-decadal sea level rise"
Dominques et al (2008) Nature, 453, 1090-1094.

The rise is expected to be at the end of the century 1 meter.
"Sea level rise could bust IPCC estimate"
New Scientist, 10 March 2009

I backed up what I said now it's your turn.

8/13/2012 2:10:17 AM

Reynardine

Sarge, even taking everything you say as true, do you have the remotest idea what even a one-meter rise would do to the areas I mention? And twenty feet would wipe out Dade and Collier Counties completely, salt Lake Okeechobee, and destroy the Biscayne Aquifer, regardless of whether it came from melt or thermal expansion . Yes: I'm a Floridian, and for all the heat, mildew, bugs, and Rick Scott, that's what I intend to be...not an Atlantean.

8/13/2012 5:58:17 AM

Sergeant343

Rey I said less than 20 feet not 20 feet when ice caps completely melt over the next several hundred years for Greenland and thousands for Antarctic, unless you have a valid source proving otherwise. So I think you would be long gone by that time and Florida most likely been effected by Continental Drift at the time. Al Gore's film is wrong and is only used by amateurs. A meter over the course of this century when it is only 2012 is not soon(relatively speaking). What I said is true and is held by all climate scientists, even the skeptics.

8/13/2012 12:15:52 PM

Ex-Racist

Us poor White people, being taken over by Blacks and Jews. Never mind the fact that we are still a huge majority. Dumbass.

8/14/2012 4:11:00 PM



That would be true.............if you can prove that black Americans are not descendants of white men who have sex with black women who may have been their slaves.

9/30/2012 6:20:23 AM

derpity

These fuckin racists! One day they're all just gonna have a huge gay orgy and if anybody sees it they'll scream GODDAMNIT WE GOTTA STOP ALL THIS RACE MIXING

10/5/2012 7:32:58 PM
1