The Oneness Branhamites paradoxically had unveiled this truth.
Adam and Eve were pure humans direct created by God and Abel was their fruit of thier human beings, but only Cain was not a pure human because he had the breeding of the serpent. Prior to the fall of Eve before the curse the serpent was an ape form or more than just an Ape because serpent was a very perfect animal created by God almost liken to human, proof that the serpent was liken to human because he had an ability to talk with Eve.
28 comments
I don't think he realizes that 'serpent' isn't synonomous with Satan, devil, or Lucifer. And I think he is saying that we should all convert to christianity so that we can take in the "blood of Christ"(eucharist), because only that will defeat the blood of satan, or some such nonsense. Not only does this wacky theory not have any real evidence, it doesn't have any scriputral (read:"fake") evidence either. Interesting though.
It sounds almost Gnostic in its implications; we are all impure creations of an impure creator (although in this case, the "creator" is actually an interloping entity that alters our fundamental nature) and must accept into ourselves the spirit of enlightenment. It is even, perhaps, helped by the fact that a SERPENT is at fault, since serpents are well known fertility symbols in both pagan faiths and Freudian psychoanalysis. Intriguing theological premise, but falls apart upon closer inspection. For one thing, a perfect God would have no reason to create such an imperfect interloper. Therefore, God would lose omniscience (creating something that he didn't know how it would behave) and omnipotence (creating something that would act against his wishes), plus the inherent loss of omnipresence inherent to Genesis (God is away from Adam and Eve at the time of the fall, and only finds out later). In this sense, one would have to conclude that God is ALSO an imperfect interloper, although this one hopefully created man out of feelings of benevolence. The other major problem, of course, is that it assumes man can breed with apes, which as evolutionists point out time and again, just isn't possible.
... Ehm... Ignoring everything else, I don't think two species can mate and produce any offspring. Especially not a reptile/mammal cross.
Dragon said, "I don't think two species can mate and produce any offspring."
wait.... no, really.... you're shitting me, right? Apes are snakes and they screwed Eve and.... man, I've got to read my bible more clearly, cos I don't remember all this...
***Adam and Eve were pure humans direct created by God and Abel was their fruit of thier human beings, but only Cain was not a pure human because he had the breeding of the serpent.***
Ok, apart from the fact that you still can't explain where does Caine's wife come from, explain something to me. How do an hybrid from two totally different species, not just survives, but also is fertile?. Listen, if God cared to make biology that way, let's be at least consistent.
If I understand correctly, a female horse and a male donkey can mate to produce a mule (which cannot produce young), and when a male zebra and a female donkey mate they produce a, wait for it, "zedonk" or "zebrass".
Those are different sub -species of the same family, just like lions and tigers can mate to make a "liger", or some smaller domestic dog breeds that have jackal blood in their ancestry. An ape making babies with a snake is about as likely as a man making babies with a freshwater bass.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
