Home Archives Random Quotes Latest Comments Top 100 Submit Quote Search Log In

Quote# 89210

So how is it that the designers of the London 2012 branding got away with a more abstract approach than was necessary, or than would be tolerated in most other corporate projects?

It only makes sense when we consider that the ‘2’ is supposed to be reminiscent of a ‘Z’, and that a sideways ‘Z’ also serves perfectly as an ‘N’.

Here’s my take on the significance of the London-Zion link and why no other political union than the United Kingdom could have hosted the games this year: Israel, or Zion, was essentially created by the British Government. Read the ‘Rothschild Timeline’ in my links for more info on that. London also, as a corporation separate from the rest of England, is a major centre for banking and thus Zionist ambitions. Furthermore, no nation other than perhaps the USA has been more instrumental in aiding the Rothschild Zionist wars against genuine rebel-nations such as Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya.

In short, London/Britain and Zion represent a political union more potent than almost any other. The two entities are inextricably linked and inter-dependent in what they’ve become. It is a union which is of no benefit to the average British Citizen, yet in the subtle visual binding of London and Zion the average British citizen is subconsciously programmed to accept the permanent normality of London’s alliance with Israel.

Steed, The Eye of Woden 20 Comments [8/27/2012 3:29:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 17
WTF?! || meh
Username:
Comment:



1
Adey

Can I just call "bollocks" and move on?

8/27/2012 3:32:21 AM

jsonitsac

Um, the Iranans beat you to that idea.

8/27/2012 4:09:18 AM

Leighton Buzzard

Oh, yeah, the Irgun and the Stern Gang never killed any British soldiers, no, sir.

Meanwhile, back in reality, the UK government (of whatever stripe) has mainly been decidedly cool toward Israel: the Arabist tradition was strong at the Foreign Office (and it's not entirely dead yet), and the Left has always been pro-Palestinian. The last time the UK got involved on the Israeli side was Suez, 1956, and that debacle seems to have killed any pro-Zionist feeling in government stone dead.

I kid you not, not even all the Jews in Britain are Zionist (and nobody else gives a toss about Israel at all).

8/27/2012 4:25:29 AM

Reynardine

Steed, your brains appear to have been gelded.

8/27/2012 4:36:17 AM

Raised by Horses

"It only makes sense when we consider that the ‘2’ is supposed to be reminiscent of a ‘Z’, and that a sideways ‘Z’ also serves perfectly as an ‘N’."

...and N, as you all know, stands for Newton, the SI unit of force. Force, people. But what kind of force? Force, you see, to be projected on an unsuspecting population by the New World Order, by forcing them into secret FEMA camps. It's hardly a coincidence that NWO starts with 'N', now is it? WAKE UP SHEEPLE!!

See? I can do the whole crazy conspiracy nut thing, too.

8/27/2012 4:43:55 AM

Doubting Thomas

Who the fuck cares?

@Raised By Horses:

The sad part is that you could go to any conspiracy message board and post exactly what you just wrote, and people will take you totally seriously.

8/27/2012 5:48:15 AM

Ebon

I'm British so I'm just going to call this bollocks and move on.

8/27/2012 6:00:53 AM

Rabbit of Caerbannog

"It only makes sense when we consider that the ‘2’ is supposed to be reminiscent of a ‘Z’, and that a sideways ‘Z’ also serves perfectly as an ‘N’."

No...no it's not...please stop with the bizarre letter games.

8/27/2012 6:48:33 AM

Oh My Dog!

If you're going to go with a loony conspiracy theory can't you at least make it a trifecta?

Anything less is so boring.

8/27/2012 11:20:39 AM

Giardano Bruno

London is NOT a corporation separate from the rest of England. I should know, I live here.

8/27/2012 12:53:19 PM


The Anonymous

I'm pretty sure Mahmoud Ahmedinajad said that a few years back.

You can find whatever you want in that logo. If you look at it just right, it's a swastika. Or maybe it's Lisa Simpson giving a blowjob. OR MAYBE IT'S JUST A GODDAMN STYLISED 2012!

8/27/2012 1:43:42 PM

God

Actually, to be fair, if you read the post he's talking about a different Olympics logo. So this is... kind of new.

8/27/2012 1:46:17 PM

farpadokly

First of all, it doesn't look anything like "zion". It looks much more like Lisa blowing Bart.
Israel was created by the Balfour Declaration in 1917. But the modern state of Israel was created in 1948 by the United Nations. Jewish terrorists embarked on a series of bombings against the British colonial government.
London is not a corporation separate from the rest of England. It's a "major centre for banking", but so what? You could say the same for Amsterdam, Paris, Berlin, New York, or any big city.
I think you're overestimating the influence of the Rothschild family just a tad. A much more important influence on the behaviour of nations is plain old economics and the need to turn a profit. Jews are a minority in the British banking and financial system, I can assure you, being 0.5% of the overall population.
The average British citizen can't be subconsciously programmed by something that doesn't even look like "zion" and might not even associate the word "zion" with Israel if it did.
And again, London is not an independent state and can't form alliances with any other state. Only the UK government is able to do that.
@God: True, but the other logo looks nothing like "zion" either.

8/27/2012 3:02:25 PM

J. James

@Raised By Horses
Your posts are growing ever more delightful to read. Keep up the good work.

As for Steed...

"So how is it that the designers of the London 2012 branding got away with a more abstract approach than was necessary, or than would be tolerated in most other corporate projects?

It only makes sense when we consider that the ‘2’ is supposed to be reminiscent of a ‘Z’, and that a sideways ‘Z’ also serves perfectly as an ‘N’."

If you need that much space to explain why your interpretation of what is basically a Roscharch inkblot test is the real and irrefutable truth, you are wrong by default. No one can rationalize a subjective reaction to what amounts to art, you colossal idiot.

And the rest of the Rothschilds-Zion stuff is complete dreck as well, not to mention it doesn't even follow the logic of the 2012 logo connection you drew.

8/27/2012 3:39:50 PM

J. James

@Raised By Horses
Your posts are growing ever more delightful to read. Keep up the good work.

As for Steed...

"So how is it that the designers of the London 2012 branding got away with a more abstract approach than was necessary, or than would be tolerated in most other corporate projects?

It only makes sense when we consider that the ‘2’ is supposed to be reminiscent of a ‘Z’, and that a sideways ‘Z’ also serves perfectly as an ‘N’."

If you need that much space to explain why your interpretation of what is basically a Roscharch inkblot test is the real and irrefutable truth, you are wrong by default. No one can rationalize a subjective reaction to what amounts to art, you colossal idiot.

And the rest of the Rothschilds-Zion stuff is complete dreck as well, not to mention it doesn't even follow the logic of the 2012 logo connection you drew.

8/27/2012 3:41:13 PM

pete

It just kills him that he's too young to have been a guard at Auschwitz.

8/28/2012 5:21:17 PM

Bleep

I think this nutjob here is referring to the City of London Corporation (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_of_London_Corporation) which is the municipal governing body for the City, and hence for the major financial institutions therein, rather than the whole of Greater London.

Having said that, it doesn't make what he says any less insane.

8/29/2012 3:12:25 AM

Mr Blur

Nah, everybody here in the UK knowsthat the 2012 Olympic logo shows Lisa Simpson giving oral sex. We love the Simpsons over here.

8/30/2012 4:10:19 PM

Pie Man

It's just a rather ugly Olympic logo. No conspiracy needed.

8/31/2012 2:26:53 PM
1