Home Archives Random Quotes Latest Comments Top 100 Submit Quote Search Log In

Quote# 89248

Your problem Mcgrath is that no divine command or teaching states we are to follow scientists or their conclusions. They are mere humans subject to the sin and corruption that entered the world at Adam's sin.
There are divine commands and teachings to follow God, Jesus, and the Bible. In fact, there are verses teaching us to NOT follow the unbelieving world. Since Darwin rejected God and in his own words stated that his 'conversion' never took, anyone following any form of evolutionary teaching would be following an unbeliever and deceitful teachings.
Your choice is not to repent and turn back to God or continue following lies.

Dr. David Tee, Exploring Our Matrix 27 Comments [8/30/2012 5:28:19 AM]
Fundie Index: 42
WTF?! || meh
Username:
Comment:



1 2
Mister Spak

"Your problem Mcgrath is that no divine command or teaching states we are to follow scientists or their conclusions."

Your problem Tee is that the internet where you posted your nonsense was created using the conclusions of atheistic scientists. Everything you post on it affirms the superiority of science.

8/30/2012 5:43:33 AM

Oh My Dog!

1. Prove sin exists
2. Prove your God is the true god.
3. Evolution is supported by evidence, therefore I accept it; I don't just "follow" what scientists say unquestioningly, they have to back up their claims with evidence first.

Fundies, of course, think the ToE is a religion so I can see why you made this error.

Look up "scientific method", and "peer review".

8/30/2012 5:47:41 AM

Dr.Shrinker

"Your problem Mcgrath is that no divine command or teaching states we are to follow scientists or their conclusions."

- Scientists have something better on their side, tangible results.

8/30/2012 5:57:04 AM

John_in_Oz

If God is Truth then you just blasphemed against God.

8/30/2012 6:16:04 AM

dionysus

Your problem Mcgrath is that no divine command or teaching states we are to follow scientists or their conclusions. They are mere humans subject to the sin and corruption that entered the world at Adam's sin.

And yet it wasn't until these mortal, corrupted mere humans used science that they were able to conquer numerous diseases and even exterminate small pox. God just sat around with his almighty thumb up his almighty ass as his most fervent believers suffered horribly and prayed for his to help. Even if God exists he's either retarded or malicious and we are clearly better off using science than expecting that moron/douchebag to do anything useful.

Lesson: use science if you want something accomplished, use God if you want his image in a slice of toast (if you squint hard enough).

8/30/2012 6:28:05 AM

Leighton Buzzard

Doctor? Of what, bullshit?

8/30/2012 7:23:14 AM

Fundies Make Me Sick

Actually, Jesus told his followers to do what their governments tell them because they have authority on this Earth. And the government says that people need to be educated and part of that is learning about science and math. You fail again.

8/30/2012 7:50:11 AM

BobsOldSocks

What's this guy a doctor of? Fuckwittery?

8/30/2012 7:58:31 AM

Zagen30

Since Darwin rejected God and in his own words stated that his 'conversion' never took, anyone following any form of evolutionary teaching would be following an unbeliever and deceitful teachings.

That's not how science works. The origins of a theory don't completely determine its validity in the future since it's subject to intense scrutiny and criticism. Even if Darwin was actually trolling the world with On the Origin of Species and all of his writings were intentionally false, the research done on evolution since then has suggested that, on the whole, it's a very solid explanation (obviously there's debate and uncertainty about some of the finer details).

This is a great example of how evolution is not, in fact, a religion. Its proponents do not worship the important people in its history and do not consider them to be infallible. They use their own talents to test the theory in ways. As opposed to many religious scholars, who will only accept things that affirm their belief and are unwilling to consider things that question its validity.

8/30/2012 9:52:04 AM

JSS

>Claims educated scientists are irrelevant.

>Somehow feels the need to call himself a doctor.

8/30/2012 9:55:16 AM

pete

Once again I am compelled to direct Davey to read the Constitution of the United States of America.

8/30/2012 10:18:26 AM

The Crimson Ghost

There's also no divine command that I have pay attention to you Mr Tee; or your bullshit story. You claiming it's divine does not make it so. Just do yourself a favor & take the red pill.

8/30/2012 10:25:43 AM

checkmate

There are divine commands and teachings to follow God

And those "divine commands and teachings" were supposedly made by whom? Right, by God. So your God is basically saying "follow me because I say so".

Could you please quote an independent divine source for those "commands and teachings to follow God"? That would make things a little more reliable. Oh, you can't do that?

So what are the "commands and teachings to follow God" you mention worth if I don't believe in God. Chicken shit, that's what they're worth.

8/30/2012 11:33:00 AM



...no divine command or teaching states we are to follow scientists or their conclusions.

I'll call you, "Dr." Tee, and raise you...

There is no US of A law, legal command or requirement of any kind that states we are to follow a faith, dogma or religion; its adherents or their conclusions.

The 1st A just stipulates there can be no state-established religion nor can the free practice of religion be prohibited (along with speech, press, assembly, etc.).

8/30/2012 11:43:35 AM

Osiris

"Dr." David Tee. Are you a doctor the same way Dr Pepper is a doctor?

8/30/2012 12:08:13 PM

John

Your problem Mcgrath is that no divine command or teaching states we are to follow scientists or their conclusions.

There's no divine command to take a crap, either. That's why you're full of it.

8/30/2012 12:16:35 PM

Alencon

No offense DAVID, but you're full of crap.

8/30/2012 4:09:09 PM

Old Viking

Enough of this guy.

8/30/2012 4:51:07 PM

Ebon

If you're a doctor, I'm a Dutchman.

8/30/2012 5:12:19 PM

Mihangel apYrs

@Oh My Dog!

0 Prove there is a god

8/30/2012 10:58:30 PM

Mihangel apYrs

@Oh My Dog!

you missed out

0 Prove there is a god

8/30/2012 10:58:47 PM

Sammettik

"They are mere humans subject to the sin and corruption that entered the world at Adam's sin"

Eve sinned before adam.
Poor doc doesn't even know his own scripture.

8/30/2012 10:59:50 PM

Pule Thamex

"There are divine commands and teachings to follow God, Jesus, and the Bible."

Where divine means the drooling acceptance of any old inane rubbish written by spittle-flecking, beardy, sand nits. Slavering awe for the banal and trite utterances of canting zealots whose rabid fever dreams pass for profound insights among the lowly tee boys of this world.

Doctor Tee - doctor of brackish infusions for the gullible and the ignoble and master of divine gibberish.

8/31/2012 2:57:04 AM

Doubting Thomas

Again with the "God didn't tell us to follow science" claim. If you're not a hypocrite, you should not be using a computer connected to the internet to type this. Using modern technology is "following science," so you fail.

8/31/2012 6:43:12 AM

farpadokly

It doesn't say you are *not* to follow scientists or their conclusions either. This is how you are able to get religious scientists and scientifically-minded priests.
The fact of evolution is independent of Darwin, it would be just as factual if he had never existed. I don't understand the point about "conversion". Darwin was born into the Church of England and later became agnostic. He was never "converted" to anything.


8/31/2012 8:49:50 AM
1 2