1 2 3
Ever read your Bible? God is far closer to a fascist ideology than homosexuals. Ever read a fucking history book? Fascits didn't always reject god you dipshit. Nor did homosexuals fare very well under fascism. Multiple layers of fail
9/5/2012 10:23:24 AM
9/5/2012 10:42:44 AM
If a fascist rejects God he is kicked out of the party.
If a fascist rejects God whats to keep him from becoming a homosexual besides his being a hetrosexual, and his fear of being executed for homosexuality?
If a Homosexual rejects God whats to keep him from becoming a fascist besides fear of being killed?
Facism; The belief that a god named Gawd created the state, and ordained the corporation to run it in the name of Gawd.
9/5/2012 10:43:07 AM
I reject your god, as there in no evidence for it, and I'm neither a homosexual or a fascist. Now what?
9/5/2012 10:44:41 AM
Capitalizing the First Letter of some Words does Not Make your Argument More Convincing.
9/5/2012 11:01:10 AM
Morals ARE subjective, you doss cunt. If God is the ultimate moral judge, then morals are still subjective, they are subjective to God. People do kill each other, sometimes for their own ends, sometimes for "God", sometimes so that you can drive a fucking SUV to church. So fuck the shut up.
9/5/2012 11:08:02 AM
> If a Homosexual rejects God whats to keep him from becoming a fascist?
Dear fundies: It's understandable that for your poor confused minds, everything you disagree with is Evil, and everything Evil is identical and interchangeable in every way.
This is not, however, the way the reality works.
Please take that into consideration before you start using logic. Because otherwise, you're not making any frigging sense.
9/5/2012 11:37:27 AM
Ffs. Homosexuality is not fascism and vice versa. And fascism didn't "reject God". The Nazis had their "Gott Mit Uns", and the Spanish and Italian fascists were openly in league with the Church. It's radical nationalism, not atheism.
"What's to keep (a homosexual) from becoming a fascist?" Maybe the fact that the Nazis rounded up homosexuals and put them in camps?
There is no ideology behind sexual attraction to a certain gender for Christ's sake.
There's already a consensus that murder and theft are objectively wrong. The only people you're going to find who disagree with that are sociopaths.
9/5/2012 12:15:27 PM
The whole reason behind homosexuals is that they are a safety-valve against over-population, and orphaned children with no-one to take care of them.
The whole reason behind fascism is Right-wing ideas of deciding for the little people what's best for them, and imposing that "best" onto them, whether they like it or not.
Morals are always subjective, stupid. Just look at the Bible God, who says "Thou Shalt Not Kill, unless I command you to". Most decent human beings, regardless of political view, gender, age, sexual orientation, skin-tone, ethnicity, etc, live by the Golden Rule; "treat others as you want to be treated".
"That is why Go says", what? Guess I have to google it.
Yeah, because no God-fearing Republican has ever been "full of envy, [...] strife, deceit and malice. They are gossips, slanderers, [...] insolent, arrogant and boastful; they invent ways of doing evil; they disobey their parents; they are senseless, faithless, heartless, ruthless."
Why did you stop at Chapter 1? What's wrong with the next chapter and verse? Romans 2:1: "You, therefore, have no excuse, you who pass judgment on someone else, for at whatever point you judge the other, you are condemning yourself, because you who pass judgment do the same things."
9/5/2012 12:23:46 PM
My uncle posted this link today.
(how do I embed?)
9/5/2012 12:41:04 PM
Doesn't make enough sense to bother with.
For the record, Gott Mit Uns appeared on the belt buckles of German soldiers. It was not a Nazi slogan.
9/5/2012 1:15:56 PM
The Nazis were rabidly heterosexual and hated gays, whom they sent to concentration camps.
They were also fascists whose ranks were comprised mainly of Christians.
9/5/2012 1:22:32 PM
Are you saying that slavery was morally just back when we had slaves? Would you have considered runaway slaves to be immoral? Would you have cooperated with the status quo back then in order to be moral?
If morality is to have any pertinent meaning then it is objectively that which on the whole helps everyone the most and harms the least. Society can't just redefine these things endlessly. Slavery is objectively harmful to another human being and so it is objectively immoral.
Objective morality is properly founded on logic and reason, not religion.
9/5/2012 1:42:21 PM
Rabbit of Caerbannog
There's no ideology behind being gay!
9/5/2012 1:43:24 PM
whats to keep him from becoming a homosexual?
9/5/2012 3:25:02 PM
If a fascist rejects God then it follows that he or she will likely reject fascism.
We know that the God-rejecting fascist will also likely come to reject racism, bigotry, murder, genocide, torture, arrogance, ignorance, deceit, robbery, tyranny etc.
So come on you God-rejectors! Let's get with it!
9/5/2012 3:31:50 PM
"...they both believe Morals Are Subjective."
Almost assuredly, but so do you. Almost everyone makes subjective moral judgements all the friggin' time. From the fact that you allow your government to kill innocent Afghans and Iraqis, to the probability that you've coasted through a few stop signs when running late. You're a hypocrite.
What's to keep a Christian from becoming a fascist? Hitler and Mussolini were both Christians.
9/5/2012 4:32:42 PM
Learn the meanings of
Then let me know how you make such a preposterous link between them.
Your last sentence is incomplete. Paul was unclear, What exactly does: ..."to do those things which are not convenient..." mean?
And I notice your cherrypucking of homosexuals. Are you suggesting that Paul is not placing backbiters, fornication, covetousness etx on equal par? These, together with Paul's primitive understanding of homposexuality make you worthy of death. So don't cherrypick! If you do, you are perverting scripture, and that get's you damned.
9/5/2012 4:36:25 PM
This is a non sequitur - "it does not follow." While it is true that many of those in power in the Third Reich were open and closed homosexuals, Morality and Fascism are not necessarily mutually inclusive. Statistically, there are just as many Jewish or liberal homosexuals, and just about anything standing in contrast to Fascism. Typically, homosexuals account for 2-4 percent of an average population, according to peer-reviewed psychology journals. This is then without any basis of morality or ideology.
What's more, one could easily see a high preponderance of Republicans that are hetero in the open that are frequently caught in homo acts. Larry Craig is no different from Barney Frank, except for being closed where Frank is open.
9/5/2012 6:49:47 PM
Since God Doesn't have a God does that make him a gay fascist?
Well, He isn't married*, and except for the one time He adulterously raped Little Mary He never seems to get any. Not with females. Must not have liked crossing over all that much. His buff, blond, blue eyed son was the same way, if you believe *cough* the stories.
edit; Asherah? Then He's a cheater besides.
9/5/2012 8:19:44 PM
The whole reason behind Homosexuals and Fascism is that they both reject God.
The Church was quite active in fascist Italy under Mussolini, as it was in Spain under Franco. Quite a few members of the clergy saw no fundamental disagreement between the demands of fascism and tenets of Christianity.
Your argument fails.
9/5/2012 10:39:15 PM
Um. no. Homosexuality is an innate sexual orientation. Fascism is a right-wing political belief one chooses to have. There is no connection at all. I hope this clears things up for you.
9/5/2012 10:40:03 PM
An quote from one of my favorite old-time comedies:
"This may very well be the stupidest person on the face of the planet."
"Perhaps we should shoot him."
9/6/2012 2:29:57 AM
Wow, I checked out the rest of the comments there.
I have a new slogan for them:
WORLD NET DAILY!!!
We give fucked-up, psychotic, ignorant, shit-stains a bad name!
9/6/2012 2:45:30 AM
"That is why God says in Romans Chapter one verse 28-32."
God? I thought it was Paul speaking? Unless those letters were divinely inspired, which opens a whole new can of problems, what with their unequal quality and rather unsavory content.
9/6/2012 3:43:26 AM
1 2 3