1 2 3
A rapist is, by definition an asshole. So, if the victim has to marry her rapist, you condemn the victim to living with an asshole.
Also, what do you make of homosexual rapes? Would they have to get married too?
9/6/2012 3:41:26 AM
I have no doubt that you are a moron whose mental gymnastics to attempt to fit clearly outdated ideas into modern society would win you a gold medal at the Duh-lympics.
9/6/2012 3:43:16 AM
Maybe I'm a bit slow today, but that seriously does not compute. However, I'm quick enough even on a slow day to recognise a complete douchebag when I read crap like that.
9/6/2012 3:44:33 AM
9/6/2012 3:45:51 AM
Or, you know, maybe that would give the rapist would have more incentive to kill his victim. Or make sure she couldn't identify him.
What about rapists who are already married? Would you require them to divorce their wives?
9/6/2012 3:49:55 AM
Oh My Dog!
Oh riiiight. The Bible's answer to rape. We don't live in a bronze-age culture where a woman's worth is determined based on whether she is a virgin or not. Our laws, thankfully, are a tad more advanced than that.
This is why people think fundies are morons.
9/6/2012 3:55:25 AM
And...you would condemn a woman to live with the man who violently assaulted her for the rest of her life?
I have no doubt that if someone had to pay your father money and had to marry you if he raped you, that you would not be raped.
You have no idea how sexual assault works. You have no idea how other people think or feel or act. You are a walking exemplar of the Dunning-Kruger Effect.
I have no doubt that if rapists had to marry the women they raped, then there would be a dramatic decrease in amount of rapes, particularly "date rapes".
And I have no doubt that there would be a dramatic increase in the number of women murdered.
So, it would seem that you are in favor of rapes, so long as the women does not have to marry the rapist.
You are a walking humanoid mass of animated, pinworm-infested excrement. Choke on a chicken bone, you fuck.
9/6/2012 4:03:11 AM
Raised by Horses
"So, it would seem that you are in favor of rapes, so long as the women does not have to marry the rapist."
No, we are not in favor of "rapes", period. Here's your pointy cap. Go sit in the corner and think about what you've said.
9/6/2012 4:04:13 AM
Right, because if there's somebody you can trust to love and honor her for the rest of her life, it's her rapist. And what about serial rapists? Should we bring back polygamy?
9/6/2012 4:05:47 AM
"The Bible says it, therefore I will engage in a valiant attempt to defend it no matter how indefensible the statement is, that settles it."
9/6/2012 4:35:26 AM
That rather relies upon the rapist actually getting caught in the first place.
You know, kind of like the "lock them up" approach we take now which is apparently so much less of a disincentive than getting to marry your victim.
9/6/2012 4:58:18 AM
Have you been reading the bible lately?
9/6/2012 5:05:40 AM
The only thing that forcing rape victims to marry their rapists will accomplish is decreasing the number rapes that are reported.
9/6/2012 5:07:41 AM
What if the rapist is not caught?
What if the rapist is a relative?
What if the rapist is already married?
What if the rapist has raped more than one person?
What if the rapist is of the same sex as their victim?
Someone has not thought this through...
9/6/2012 5:08:10 AM
Okay, Barfy...you know the drill....
9/6/2012 5:10:28 AM
I notice you don't care one bit about the poor woman being raped having to live with the person who caused her severe emotional trauma.
What's to keep a guy from raping the woman he married because he raped her?
Stop trying to make barbaric bible passages look like good ideas. You're not doing yourself any favors.
9/6/2012 5:14:09 AM
Where is our, "Sexists Say the Darnedest Things"?
9/6/2012 5:15:02 AM
This is insane troll logic, your premise on drugs.
9/6/2012 5:35:23 AM
Let's try this:
I have no doubt that if someone were to be executed if he murdered you, that you would not be murdered.
I have no doubt that if murderers faced a death penalty, then there would be a dramatic decrease in amount of murders.
Yeah, that works fine, doesn't it? Especially in Texas, were the death chamber never has time to accumulate any dust.
9/6/2012 5:44:58 AM
I have no doubt that if you were required to marry somone who raped you, that you would be whining about being forced to follow an obsolete legal code.
So it seems, that you are in favor of other people marrying their rapist, but not you.
9/6/2012 5:51:37 AM
Ed, I hope a grizzly bears rapes your ass, hands your father twenty bucks, marries you and then rapes your ass daily from that point on.
9/6/2012 5:53:23 AM
And what if the woman concerned is already married, and her father is dead...?
Never mind where the Bible's 'morality' on marriage falls down, just this alone (never mind the whole 'Talking Snake' malarkey, and this despite the claims by fundies that the 'Word of God is Truth'*') makes the Bible fall down. Period.
*- Find for me a talking snake. What's that, you say? You can't? Well then. This alone proves that the Bible is nothing but Lies. [b]Ergo scientific Facts - based on Evidence - are superior to your so called 'Truth'.
9/6/2012 6:05:56 AM
Does this rule apply in Israel? It'd rather blow a hole in your theory if it does, because oh look, their ex-president was convicted of rape.
9/6/2012 6:22:23 AM
There's so much I want to say to this, but I am unable to forge my thoughts into coherent sentences. Therefore, I say only "Fuck you. You have no business being in society."
9/6/2012 6:24:41 AM
And by your ... um... logic(?), I also condone murder so long as the murderer does not have to eat his victim.
9/6/2012 6:38:38 AM
1 2 3