Jodie #fundie

Jodie #fundie moonbattery.com

The blacks who follow Obama do NOT know Jesus. They are under the curse of Canaan. They do not respect authority and refuse to believe in God’s word. They are absolutely repulsive to me, but I am grateful to God that they will not be Heaven with us.

Now, on the other hand, I LOVE the conservative blacks. I see them as so strong and brave to go against the scoffers, mockers, and murderers of the left.

God bless the descent people of this country and PLEASE, keep cursing the evil ones. AMEN!

102 comments

old comment by J. James

Okay, anonymous commenter, ordinarily I'd let it go, but this really is rather egregiously bad:

"Obama IS a "conservative black"

In the 1980s or 1990s, he would be. But this is 2012, year of the Michelle Bachmann and the Rick Santorum. Conservatism don't mean shit to reactionaries.

"- Like Bush, he is favor government surveillance like (Renewed Patriot Act)"

This is rather annoying, but what choice does he have? It would be political suicide to oppose it. The right keeps pressing for these things, and crying "weakness!" and "terrorist sympathizer!" if you don't play ball. Not to mention the critical part: the American people aren't that far behind them.

"- Like Bush, he condones torture (Did not shut down Guantanamo or other black sites)"

Okay, this is ridiculous. Obama has CONDEMNED torture. He promised to close Guantanimo, and he failed to deliver. What the heck does that have to do with torture? "Condoning torture" and "failing to close down a prison where torture once occurred, but no longer" are two totally different things.

"- Like Bush, he invaded an oil-rich nation (Libya)"

I'm starting to hate having to defend Obama over this stuff, but REALLY? You think that Obama and NATO went to war with Libya because they have oil?! Need I remind you that we don't have a dog in that game, and that it is primarily Europe(where gas is crazy expensive) that uses a fraction of Libyan oil? And one other thing: was there NO other mitigating factors at work there? Like, say, a civil war, perhaps? Besides, criticizing Obama for being a warmonger makes no sense. He ended the Iraq war, is ending the Afghanistan war, and unlike Republicans, he doesn't want to launch a Jihad against Iran.

"- Like Bush, he bails out corrupt corporations using taxpayer money with no oversight"

You can disapprove of Obama's new oversight organizations, but lying about their very existence? No. And are you disapproving of the GM bailout that saved the American auto industry? Congratulations, you agree with Mitt Romney.

"Obama goes even further than Bush by using the Espionage Act to crackdown on whistleblowers who dare to expose corruption. (He did this 6 times so far)"

To be fair, the White House is leaking like a sieve. And you think Republicans would be any better at this? You'd have to change the public's "middle" FAR to the left before you can expect this kind of shit to be unacceptable again.

And finally, here's a short list of why Obama ISN'T the second coming of Bush:
Healthcare- yes, he used the old Republican idea, but he would have gotten nowhere with the Public Option, and now millions more people are saving money and are insured.
Foreign Policy- Unlike Bush, I don't cringe when people look at what our President does or says.
Economy- Bush tanked it, Obama improved it. Now Republicans are blocking the American Jobs Act, and things are slowing down, but it's not worse than when he started.
Human Rights- Obama approves of Gay Marriage and Women's Reproductive Rights. He also signed the Fair Pay Act.

You see similarities to Bush? I don't.

old comment by RiJayden

"The blacks who follow Obama do NOT know Jesus. They are under the curse of Canaan. They do not respect authority and refuse to believe in God’s word. They are absolutely repulsive to me, but I am grateful to God that they will not be Heaven with us."

And I'm glad I won't be there with you as well. I'm black, AND I voted for Obama, and plan to do so again. I respect the SECULAR authority of our President, which apparently you don't. The "conservative blacks", as you put it, are Uncle Toms of the HIGHEST order, (as are conservative gays, btw), for voting against their best intrests (ie. non-discrimination laws, and anti-voter suppression)
Oh, and my grandmother is more of a Christian than you'll ever be. Cunt.

old comment by J. James

@His-4-Life

"Healthcare initiative? You're kidding me, right? I have to pay for a bunch of white people's health insurance through my tax dollars now? How is that helpful? I already had health insurance. "

This is funny for so many reasons. For one, it appears the concept of "UNIVERSAL health care" evades you. And the fact that it benefits you because it makes the system more efficient, more cost effective, and prevents victimization by insurance companies, etc., etc... Not to mention your flippant question of "how is that helpful?" doesn't exactly inspire confidence in your Christian generosity, if they aren't the same color as you.

For another, the sheer irony of your charge is blinding. "I have to pay for a bunch of white people's health insurance through my tax dollars now?" Did you know that Mitt Romney has released ads accusing that Obama has "robbed Medicare"(which is the opposite of the truth) in order to "pay for a plan that's not for us"? Look at this motherfucking ad and tell me with a straight face that it isn't playing off white fears of paying for black people's needs.

image

You paid.... (and now those icky lazy black people are gonna steal your money and park their pink cadillacs on your lawn!)

old comment by Anon-e-moose

I refer a certain person in this thread who shall remain clueless to these threads (if her selective amnesia will allow her to remind her of the contents), especially what was said in such:

http://www.fstdt.net/QuoteComment.aspx?QID=88726

http://www.fstdt.net/QuoteComment.aspx?QID=89336

And to refresh her so-called 'memory', this quote by Dr.Shrinker in this thread is very relevant (emphasis added):

http://www.fstdt.net/QuoteComment.aspx?QID=85744&Page=9

@Dr.Shrinker

"So why did you come here? Did you really think your childish rhetoric was going to win some souls today? Perhaps you heard that this site was full of atheists and heretics and you thought you'd have an easy time making us look foolish. Or perhaps you expected some one to rebuke you, and you felt the need to feel the martyr complex that your lot carries around like some perverse medal."

image

Nope, still not seeing her appear in a quote [i]directly[/i] attributed to her. As with her selective amnesia, selective butthurt much, dearie...?

I refer her to my second-to-last comment in the second quote link above.

Study the above quote by Dr.Shrinker (also what I say in aforementioned 2nd link) very carefully. Want to be continually reminded of your continual FAIL whenever you deign to infect this place with your presence? Unless you want to continually prove what an intellectual - and emotional - masochist you are, all you have to do is not continue to troll FSTDT. The only one stopping you - is you.

Living in my UK, with it's National Health Service - since 1948? (*Whips out of wallet EHIC Card ,which ensures I have access to free healthcare anywhere within the EU*). Feels good, man. [/hyper-smug & ultra-superior]

old comment by Anon-e-moose

@Troll/Slimebag Nuts4Life

http://www.fstdt.net/QuoteComment.aspx?QID=45089&Page=1

@Jman

"Why try to convince anyone to believe what you believe?"

You'd do well to ask yourself that question, Troll/Slimebag/Nuts4Life. Then, considering what you've said in another thread in particular, ask yourself how - and why - you can possibly justify your continued presence in FSTDT?

http://www.fstdt.net/QuoteComment.aspx?QID=88726&Page=9

After all you've said, you've done enough. Have you no sense of decency? At long last, have you left no sense of decency?

And to borrow further from Joseph Welch:

'You have seen fit to bring it [your blatant bigotry & discrimination] out, and if there is a God in heaven, it will do neither you nor your cause any good!'

old comment by Valerius

@His4Life

Anon-e-moose has never once said he "'might enjoy' being anally raped". Stop making shit up. He speculated that he might enjoy the sensation of having his prostate stimulated which would be achieved by anal penetration during sex. He never once mentioned the word rape, and if anal sex automatically means rape to you, then you're a dumbass.

Furthermore, a male interest in or desire for being on the receiving end of anal sex isn't necessarily gay; it only is when the other party is also male. Homosexual simply describes a person sexually attracted to the same sex. A sexual act in and of itself isn't any more homosexual (or heterosexual for that matter) than an inanimate object can be considered to be; it depends on context. If you don't know this either, then you're a dumbass.

Thirdly, blushing isn't "blatant flirting". Have you never seen or heard of people blushing in humility when receiving praise or commendation, which is most likely the case with Anon-e-moose? If this hasn't occurred to you, then you're a dumbass.

If these are the conclusions that you draw from Anon-e-moose's posts, then you've proven that what you think is being implied by other people's posts is completely fucking ridiculous, and your accusations that Anon-e-moose implied that he's "turned on by [J. James's] comments" are as hollow and vacuous as your head. Indeed, Anon-e-moose has explicitly affirmed his attraction towards females many times over. Funny how you seem to ignore all those comments from him. But then, like he's remarked before, you do seem to have a very selective memory.

Congratulations. You're a dumbass.

old comment by Anon-e-moose

@a certain slimebag in this thread who shall remain valueless

You said (quote):

"Jesus is in everything"

And as your 'Jesus' is 'omnipresent, that therefore means he occupies every point in the universe simultaneously; which means every part of him is everywhere.

Ergo, Jesus is up the anus of every male. Q.E. and D., bitch. You said it, I didn't.

And as he's going against his own Levitical law, thus he's a hypocrite; but then, he hates hypocrites, thus he has no choice but to condemn himself to eternal roasting & arseraping by demons in Hell.

...ah, but if he doesn't want to have this happen to himself, then he has no choice but to not be up the anuses of all males, thus limiting his omnipresence, therefore he's not omnipotent, and admitting he's not 'God', ergo he doesn't exist. Q.E. and. D., bitch.

Enjoy your Catch-22, dearie. But then, your 'Bible' is proven to be nothing more than a book of fairytales, thus lies - as it & anything it claims isn't admissable in a court of law - which only deals with Reality - therefore anything you say is just empty threats. Ergo, you have thoroughly discredited yourself; and that's before we take into account your own track record of mendacity, hypocrisy & general douchebaggery which proves you're not 'Saved', and you're not a 'Christian'.

'I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ'

-Mohandas K. 'Mahatma' Gandhi

...oh, and one last thing: if your so-called 'Jesus' is as hypocritical as you admit he is, It says so much about his 'father', who was at least as much a player as Zeus; example: Mary.

http://skepticsannotatedbible.com/says_about/pedophilia.html

...a child bride, no less. Therefore your 'God' is nothing more than a kiddy-diddling paedophile nonce.

Ergo, we Atheists are more than infinitely superior to him. Our morals are superior to his, after all...:

5th Commandment: Thou shalt not take the life of another

image

God: 2,038,344

Satan: 10 (and only on God's authorisation)

Anon-e-moose: 0

Q.E. and D., bitch. And I'm aware that you claimed to be a 'crackwhore' once. How Giveitaday destroyed your argument backing up such a claim then.

Hypocrisy & mendacity is addictive. Once a liar starts giving false witness, they can't stop. But then, that's right-wing Fundamentalist Christians for you: hypocrisy is hardwired into their DNA. They're no more Christians than Richard Dawkins. And you don't see him behaving the way they do.

Never mind anything you say (especially recently), your existence is invalid.

@Dr.Shrinker

And never mind lying about 'her' gender, with her constant 'revenge fantasies', which emphasises one particular aspect of such, Troll/Slimebag/Nuts4Life is lying about 'her' sexuality. Wouldn't surprise me if 'she' wasn't what 'she' claimed, Two words: Closet Case

old comment by Dr.Shrinker

@ His4Life

"Anon-e-moose, you have thoroughly discredited yourself here."

- Look who's talking! Your tall tales are the stuff of legend here. You've shown yourself to be blatantly ignorant about every subject you have horned in on. When you are confronted on your ignorance and dishonesty, you pretend not to know what we are talking about. And, when your ignorance and dishonesty are illustrated, you either fade away or stomp off after indulging your fantasies about seeing us all anally-raped in the afterlife.

You have no credibility here lady (assuming you are not lying about your gender too). And you have no one to blame but yourself!

old comment by Anon-e-moose

@Valerius

And what one thing that a certain slimebag in this thread who shall remain clueless - certainly valueless - doesn't realise, is this: anal sex isn't purely the preserve of gay men. Oh no. There are heterosexual couples who practice such too. And - as hard as it may be (pun not intended! X3 ) for fundies such as the slimebag in this thread to realise - it's not only the female who can be the recipient of such pleasuring, neither. One word: Strapons.

So, as you - and I - have explained here (as before), if stimulation of the prostate gland can only induce pleasure (and not just given by male 'demons'; where, pray, does it say in Christian doctrine that said 'demons' can't be female....? :9) how, pray, can it be a humiliating, ergo a bad thing?!

old comment by Anon-e-moose

@A certain slimebag in this thread who shall remain valueless

Remember: you said (verbatim) 'Jesus is in everything'; you made the mistake of not being precise & specific in what you were supposed to be communicating to everyone. Besides, I'm just stating the fact - as per your vague statement - that as Jesus is omnipresent, and therefore every part of him occupies every point in the universe simultaneously, ergo, he is up the anuses of all males (and you not possessing the hindsight to consider how your statement could be construed; but then, I'm only going by your own 'beliefs' doctrine, that Jesus is everywhere; and there's been plenty of Christian Repubican politicians - to say nothing of their 'supportive' pastors - who have been caught doing the same thing themselves, so you & your GOP ilk have room to talk, re. 'morals').

Want to prove me wrong, re. Jesus up every male's anus, thus breaking his own Levitical law? Then you have no choice but to admit that - via his selective omnipresene, thus there are limits to his own 'Omnipotence', therefore he's not God and he contradicts himself, ergo he doesn't exist, and all your 'threats' of an eternal BBQ & 'demonic buttsex' are just that: Empty.

Your personal 'beliefs' (which have been discredited many times by you yourself) don't count for shit here on Planet Reality. Go ahead: prove we Atheists wrong. Remember: Only court-admissable hard, solid, physical forensic evidence to the satisfaction of we Atheists is allowed. 'Your word against theirs-esque "I 'believe it's so, because the Bible says so" claims' not allowed.

Like I say, Catch-22 can be such a bitch when she wants to be, eh...?! >:D

old comment by Anon-e-moose

@His4Life

"Anon-e-moose, you have thoroughly discredited yourself here. We know what your agenda is. You are a closeted gay man who has openly speculated (on these forums) that you "might enjoy" being anally raped and that you're "turned on" by thought of it. You've blatantly flirted with men on these forums, "blushing" at J. James and implying that you were turned on by his comments."

image

Oh no more, please Mr. Wilde, I am bereft of ribs!

http://www.fstdt.net/QuoteComment.aspx?QID=88726&Page=7

@His4Life

"I'm advoiding ad hominems - can you guys please try to be mature enough to do the same?"

image

I'm not the one with revenge fantasies involving buttsex by demons in the 'afterlife'. Nor am I a hypocrite who demands that others not use ad hominems, yet is reduced to such herself; but she protests when others do the same (and Jesus as an omni-bumboy/God being a paedophile aren't ad hominems, but statements of fact. Prove me wrong otherwise). I'm not the one who dodges/refuses to answer questions asked to the satisfaction of the questioners (which would destroy her so-called 'beliefs' if she did). And I'm not the fundie who is an attention whore here in FSTDT.

The only question that can be asked of you now, Troll/Slimebag/Nuts4Life, especially if you want to prove us wrong about you being nothing more than a mentally handicap-based attention whore, is this:

http://www.fstdt.net/QuoteComment.aspx?QID=45089&Page=1

@Jman

"Why try to convince anyone to believe what you believe?"

If you have no 'agenda' yourself, why are you here?

http://www.fstdt.net/QuoteComment.aspx?QID=26606&Page=4

"Remember, everytime you and your husband have sex, Jesus is there. Is He pleased by how you have sex?"

I refer you to Adrian's comment. Also mine...! >:D

old comment by Anon-e-moose

@Jordab the Folf

I don't hear - least of all see - Jesus himself deny it, neither. After all, he hung around with twelve men, two of whom were sailors. One of said twelve kissed him. He didn't have a girlfriend, nor did he marry a woman (PROTIP: that Coptic papyrus. If proven to be genuine, then Christianity is fucked, certainly it's patriarchal structure; also the Catholic Church's clergy's 'celibacy' rule's right to exist). He wore a dress.

@Troll/Uneducated/Nuts4Life (emph-ass-is added):

"she simply created the embryo in her womb"

Nope, not seeing exact, precise verbatim wording in the Bible about that; remember: no 'Apologetics' allowed in discussion of the non-peer reviewed, non-secular Bible, which cannot be used to explain itself, least of all be admissable in court). So, Mary is superior to God? You said it, I didn't.

Actually, Mary was touched by His Noodly Appendage. Why?:

We now know that there's a deity more powerful than God:

http://www.fstdt.net/QuoteComment.aspx?QID=63674&Page=2

A statue of Jesus annihilated, yet a 'Humanist' statue is still intact, still existing...? Do you have an explanation for this, if America is 'God's Own Country', as claimed by fundies?

Yet, the county where I live here in the UK, Yorkshire, is known as 'God's Own Country'. Nope, no tornadoes, hurricanes etc here (and I live in Hull, one of the Top 5 least religious cities in the UK), unlike the Midwest & Bible Belt states in the US. 'Tornado Alley'; Hurricane Katrina: devastated Louisiana, and churches annihilated. Yet, the 'sinful' Sodom & Gomorrah-esque French Quarter of New Orleans was barely touched. The only explanation (check one):

[ ] Your 'God' now hates you right-wing fundies, and now favours LGBT people, left-wingers, Atheists, women wanting abortions, et al.

[ ] Your 'God' has been usurped by aforementioned [i]superior[/i] deity Atheos. And we Atheists, LGBT people, left-wingers, women wanting abortions et al will be going to Heaven. No 'worship', 'faith' or 'belief' in said deity required.

Choose wisely. And considering the above facts, I suggest you start changing allegiances in terms of 'Gods'; taking into account Occam's Razor, Pascal's Wager, and a quote by a certain Marcus Aurelius, then I'm not the one who'll be buttsexed by a male demon in an eternal BBQ. More like, I'll be sexing up hot female demons, whilst enjoying tasty BBQ:

image

:9 >:D

'Live a good life. If there are gods and they are just, then they will not care how devout you have been, but will welcome you based on the virtues you have lived by. If there are gods, but unjust, then you should not want to worship them. If there are no gods, then you will be gone, but will have lived a noble life that will live on in the memories of your loved ones.'

-Marcus Aurelius

Speaking as a Pastafarian, the afterlife we speak of springs to mind...! Atheos = His Noodlyness the Flying Spaghetti Monster? The above facts, omens, signs & portents etc, coupled with Pascal's wager (and the quote by Marcus Aurelius), means it's not looking good for you & your right-wing fundie ilk...! >:D

Occam's Razor slits Pascal's Wager up a treat. And the quote by Marcus Aurelius was way before Occam. Least of all before Pascal had made his 'Wager'.

Philosophically/Logically, and therefore Theologically, you're fucked, dearie. Can't deny the facts. And that's the way we roll here on Planet Reality.

'Just the facts, ma'am.' [/"Dragnet"]

old comment by Anon-e-moose

@Jordab the Folf

'Assuming those aren't two men or two women, then great'

"Welp, there you have it, folks. Proof that His is anti-gay. Good job, Moosey, you got 'er. *Gives you the most bisexual snuggles ever as a reward.*"

Also you must award her with the Condoning sex with a minor Award. Also the award for the worst 'Inferior Americentric Idiot':

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disappearance_of_Megan_Stammers

That guy in those CCTV pictures? Teacher Jeremy Forrest. 30.

The female with him? One of his pupils, Megan Stammers: 15.

(Had he never heard of the 1980s song - seeing as he's a passionate music fan - by The Police "Don't Stand So Close To Me"?!)

Well, the Bible doesn't condemn underage sex; and worse besides.

As stated previously, you worship a 'Saviour' who - by definition, as he is 'omnipresent' (and that's every part of him) - is up the anus of all males; you said it, I didn't. And that your 'God' no less is a kiddy-diddling paedophile nonce, so should we be surprised...?

Moral: Not learning about the wider world beyond your own borders & comfort zone (the US is not the centre of the universe; it wouldn't kill you to not be Americentric), least of all looking at such through the bile-coloured bias spectacles of Faux News. Watch/read more BBC News/Reuters.com. Then you - and thus the unjustifiable 'beliefs' that shape your even more unjustifiable way of thinking based on your so-called 'beliefs' - won't be annihilated in argumental fact-traps. It could save your life. Certainly the last subatomic particles of your credibility - certainly that of your 'beliefs', thus proving that, morally, Atheism is more than infinitely superior to such.

Jodie #fundie moonbattery.com

102 comments

Confused?