Home Archives Random Quotes Latest Comments Top 100 Submit Quote Search Log In

Quote# 89808

Women are physically incapable of doing any type of job that requires a man's strength which means I disagree with this decision [to have women in combat]. The first duty of a woman is to be a homemaker but I don't mind if they work a job they are capable of doing. (Although once you have kids, you gotta stop working then raise the kids until they're about 14 or 15, I guess. Maybe a little younger)

WhitePrideNY14, Stormfront 48 Comments [9/28/2012 3:50:03 AM]
Fundie Index: 55
WTF?! || meh
Username:
Comment:



1 2
John_in_Oz

I know many men who don't have a woman's strength. I guess you're saying they should be homemakers too.

I'd be into white pride too if it weren't for dicks like you to be ashamed about.

9/28/2012 3:52:59 AM

Goosey

Female soldiers are a lot stronger than your doughy arse.

9/28/2012 4:31:13 AM

Reynardine

Clearly, you belong back in 1950, before you got senile.

9/28/2012 5:08:00 AM

VioletBeauregarde

Tell that to a female soldier, I'll be there laughing at your butt getting kicked and catching it all on a video camera!

9/28/2012 5:09:28 AM

Dyz

I bet you wouldn't last one round with the american female middle weight boxing olympic gold medal winner.

9/28/2012 5:19:31 AM

Mister Spak

"which means I disagree with this decision [to have women in combat]."

Fortunately you don't get to make that decision. Your chosen-by-god president Dumbya fucked up enough without adding your dumbfuckery to the process.

9/28/2012 5:23:23 AM

D Laurier

ugh... WhitePrideNY14 has never met a reservation girl.
Somehow I dont think he would like it.

9/28/2012 5:24:22 AM

gravematter

Size and strength don't count so much in modern warfare, compared to the days of exclusively hand-to-hand combat. That's allowing for the deluded statement that "Women are physically incapable of doing any type of job that requires a man's strength", which is just clearly wrong. There are plenty of women physically stronger than plenty of men. But it's nice of you to allow them to work. Provided they don't have kids of course. Oh no, that would never do. It's also nice to see a Stormfront member branching out into sexism. Adds a little variety to the site.

9/28/2012 5:26:15 AM

Doubting Thomas

Why don't you go back to the 1950's where you'll be more comfortable? You'd be happy with the way blacks were treated back then, too.

9/28/2012 5:36:58 AM

Anon-e-moose

"Women are physically incapable of doing any type of job that requires a man's strength which means I disagree with this decision [to have women in combat]. The first duty of a woman is to be a homemaker"

Female pilots of Tornado planes:



And only the best of the best in our RAF get to fly our Eurofighter Typhoons:



Your argument is invalid.

9/28/2012 6:25:17 AM

Canadia

"Gotta" huh? You forget yourself.

9/28/2012 6:29:20 AM



Lyudmila Pavlichenko would like to have a word with you.

9/28/2012 6:53:51 AM

The Crimson Ghost

How old is this douchwaffle? 12? Try forming an opinion about women when you grow up & meet a few.

I'm not a military girl or a weightlifter but I bet I could kick your ass in a fight. Back in high school though-I once broke a hockey stick over a male classmate's knee. He dropped his stick & bolted, hands in the air. There was much laughing.

9/28/2012 7:29:48 AM

Zagen30

Women are physically incapable of doing any type of job that requires a man's strength

[citation needed]

The first duty of a woman is to be a homemaker

[citation needed]

Although once you have kids, you gotta stop working then raise the kids until they're about 14 or 15, I guess.

[citation needed]

Noticing a trend?

9/28/2012 9:22:40 AM

Anon

Define 'combat'.

If you mean hand-to-hand, maybe you can make an argument from raw muscle mass. But being a lightweight doesn't stop my karate instructor from taking down 100-kilo former Marines, and she's a grandmother now. Ten thousand hours of karate, aikido, and judo more than offsets 20 cm of height, 40 kg of mass, 25 years of youth, and 200 hours of MCMAP.

And there are still plenty of women who are stronger than most men - talk to my cousins, one of whom worked for the DEA and the other of whom is a cop on the SWAT team rotation. I might be able to go toe-to-toe with one of them in a barehanded fight, but that's with all of the martial arts that I know. I'd lose at arm wrestling and tonfa every time.

And if you mean anything other than hand-to-hand (which is very little of combat these days), muscle mass is irrelevant. Anon-e-moose may like the RAF, but I prefer the Astronaut Corps pilots. All of the skill and high-gee manuevers of the top guns, without the shooting people.

So: 'WhitePride' is an ignorant fool as well as a misogynist and a racist.

9/28/2012 9:42:01 AM

nazani14

However, it's perfectly all right for women in the US and around the world to have the most dirty, dangerous, backbreaking jobs on farms, in factories, quarries, construction crews, etc.

9/28/2012 9:56:49 AM

Fundies Make Me Sick

Plenty of women work while raising kids. Many don't have a choice because they're single or their husband/boyfriend doesn't make enough to support the family. And there are men who would get stomped by women in terms of physical strength. Ever heard of female body builders, football players, etc?

9/28/2012 10:05:06 AM

John

Women are physically incapable of doing any type of job that requires a man's strength

If a job requires strength or physical endurance, just test for those things. It's a lot more reliable than looking at their sex organs.

9/28/2012 10:13:01 AM

Whitleylad

@Anon-e-moose

Damn it but that makes me proud of our British female RAF fighter pilots!

Like to see WhitePrideNY14 explain to them why they shouldn't be in combat and should be at home pooping out babies and doing the dishes.

9/28/2012 10:56:08 AM

Whitleylad

WhitePrideNY14, one name Boadicea, you lose. In Celtic Britain and indeed until the Norman Invasion, women weren't only revered but fought, were tribal leaders and generally worked alongside the men.

9/28/2012 11:00:40 AM

checkmate

Right! What we need is manly men in the army.



With those man boobs, who needs women?

Let the meek, petit, dainty females stay at home and raise the kids so they can become valuable citizens.




9/28/2012 11:50:16 AM

Old Viking

I think a woman should work any job she finds fulfilling. But should she be in combat? Those who think so know goddamned little about combat.

9/28/2012 12:25:37 PM

Robespierre

We don't NEED big arms on the workplace since the steam engine. If strength is needed for something, just hire strong people and ignore the gender.

9/28/2012 12:40:55 PM

Pilotess

I'm not in any way interested in being in the military, though, if women want to join the military, let them, and let them be in combat. Women have to fulfill the same physical requirements men have to fulfill.
I talked to a marine (he married into our family) and he said, his problem with women in combat is emotional, he feels more protective of women than of men and it would shock him more to see a woman die in combat than a man. Now, that is his personal feeling about the situation, but frankly, it is his problem. Why should women not be combat fighters just because men can't get their emotions under control? Besides, the way wars are fought these days combat could be anywhere, it's not that we still meet on a field and fight from morning till evening and go home at night!

9/28/2012 2:03:07 PM

Monzach

Funny thing, the three best Soviet snipers during the Great Patriotic War (that's World War II for the rest of us) were female. And one the most decorated bomber wings of the Red Air Force was staffed entirely by females as well (the (in)famous Night Witches).

9/28/2012 2:07:12 PM
1 2