Quote# 89836

This article is really silly, especially the statement "Young-earth creationism is a sin"
The real sin is that many Christians have been intimidated by abmit but empty claims by evolutionists and have accepted Evolution as a scientific fact when in reality the scientific evidence supporting it is pathetic.
“Evolution” is a vague word. The main defintions in the text books are:

1) "change over time", this is silly as it is stating the flaming obvious.

2) Micro evolution is minor changes within a species, this is real and observable and uncontested.

3) Darwinian/Macro evolution (where the conflict is) which asserts that:

a) All living things had a common ancestor. This implies that your great….. great grandfather was a self replicating molecule.

b) The observable world has come into existence by totally natural, unguided processes and specifically WITHOUT the involvement of an intelligent designer.

The evolution battle is often MISrepresented as science against religion - this is baloney!
The real battle is between good science and Darwinism. When Darwinian/Macro evolution is scrutinised using the scientific method, it crumbles.

The scientific method demands: observation, measurement, repeatability. Darwinian/Macro evolution has none of these, all it has is circumstantial evidence which is open to interpretation. Ask yourself: What evidence is there that our great .... great grandfather was a self replicating molecule?

Dr John Sanford (Geneticist and inventor of the GeneGun) said .

“The bottom line is that the primary axiom [of Darwinian/Macro evolution] is categorically false, you can't create information with misspellings, not even if you use natural selection.”

theot58, Slacktivist 33 Comments [10/1/2012 1:36:33 AM]
Fundie Index: 27

Username  (Login)
Comment  (Text formatting help) 

1 2 | bottom


*sigh* Another pack of lies and bullshit.

10/1/2012 3:50:42 PM


You Creationists lost Kitzmiller vs. Dover several years ago. We Evolutionists/Atheists are right, you fundies are wrong. The law says so.

Deal. With. It.

10/1/2012 4:28:41 PM


Sanford also believes the earth is less than 100,000 years old which geology can demonstrably show is false.

Of course that doesn't mean he's wrong about genetics. Based on the simulator "Mendel's Accountant" Sandford has in fact concluded that the genome is deteriorating and Darwinian Evolution is impossible.

His position is reject by almost all other geneticists and biologists. Still, he has published in peer reviewed journals and his position needs to be considered and not simply rejected out of hand.

10/1/2012 5:46:01 PM


"abmit but empty claims"
abmit...? Help me out here, no clue what this dunce was trying to say.

10/1/2012 7:52:31 PM


"change over time"

This is so flaming obvious you lot never get it. What's that make you?

10/1/2012 8:02:32 PM


" Ask yourself: What evidence is there that our great .... great grandfather was a self replicating molecule? "

I think the fact that the nucleus of our cells right now are still essentially self replicating molecules was evidence enough.

10/2/2012 10:26:48 PM


The difference between micro and macro evolution is the same difference as between a short walk and a long walk.

Micro evolution is just as "Darwinian" as macro evolution, stupid.

10/2/2012 10:35:15 PM

1 2 | top: comments page