"I am Jewish and attend an Orthodox synagogue"
@Jezebel's Evil Sister
"An "atheist" who believes in Divine Retribution?
This fool can't even keep his lies straight from one paragraph to the next."
"So he claims to be an atheist but then claims some sort of divine retribution is the reason for (what he calls) the first and second Jewish holocausts. Bullshit. You can't claim to be an atheist and also claim to believe in divine retribution."
With his constant lying, I'm starting to doubt even his religious credentials. Like I say, "Man Vs. Food"'s Adam Richman eats pork & shellfish; does that make him any less
a Jewish person, compared to, say... the Auschwitz survivor I met and talked with, who told me that when the SS guards murdered his family before his eyes, his Jewish faith died with them that day?
'This fool can't even keep his lies straight from one paragraph to the next'. Or from one forum to the next. Such is the nature of the right-winger: once they start lying, they can't stop. And hypocrisy is just as addictive.
Hypocrisy (as in being right
-wing). As with Misogyny: Unjustifiable.
Not taking into account how fschit relies upon the example of 'Robin Hood', who - speaking as a Brit, even I acknowledge he & his adventures are nothing more than a folk tale; pure myth & legend (and even as a 'P.R. tool' at the time*) - is probably, certainly in this case, the worst example of a bad analogy to use in an argument (if his BS can be considered an 'argument' for the unjustifiable), just two words can completely annihilate his argument as a whole:
What is (or should
be) in the psychological makeup of any man who dares to think he has the right to be considered a normal, decent, civilised, sane
member of the human race. Because no normal, decent, civilsed, human man
would so much as contemplate the notion of even thinking
of forcing his will upon a woman in any
way, for whatever reason. After all, isn't paedophilia essentially the same
thing: exerting your control
upon someone weaker than you, certainly to 'satisfy' your sexual desires, just as (your words, verbatim) re. 'rape':
'evolutionary need for sex [...] men here are justified in rape'
Informed Consent being the basis of the laws making paedophilia illegal, nay, the worst imaginable social crime next to murder (but then, like I say, no normal, decent, civilised, sane man would so much as contemplate the notion of even thinking of assaulting a child), thus Consent
of, in this instance) makes rape just as socially unacceptable.
Therefore, those (and it matters not their race, creed etc) who think of going down the route of raping a woman forfeit their right to be considered a human being, ergo they are inferior subhumans. QED.
And frankly, 15-to-life
in the slammer is less than what they deserve. Still, at least (at least I hope
; for the sake of the poor potential victim) fschit hasn't actually crossed that psychological line, and actually raped a woman. Because then - as far as the US's** prisons are concerned - he'd learn for himself what the poor woman has to deal with, when she's unjustifiably assaulted in this way; after all, the poor men in that jail have to find an outlet for their 'evolutionary need for sex', when there are no women around to be the recipient of their desires; even consenting women. Oh no, rape - being the national sport in ALL US prisons - isn't about exerting control; who's the 'Alpha Male', the 'Daddy' [/"Scum"**], or merely just to prove a point, nosiree!
I'm reminded (particularly by the forum post screenshots in this thread; appreciate the saving of such, Shax!) of an old saying that's relevant in this case (and of all his right-wing ilk; Rush Limburger, Mike 'Savage' [LOL] Weenie, I'm looking at you):
'Opinions are like arses: everyone has one, but not everyone wants to air theirs in public. They certainly don't want yours shoved in their faces.
And these days, even merely 'venting' is no
justification for so much as even thinking
of thinking in such a way as you did, fschit. And as proven by Shax's preservation of your own incriminating words, you have now discovered that even Freedoms (especially speech) come with Responsibilities
. That's why the concept of Political Correct
ness exists these days. I don't even think
as you do; I like
being Correct. Correct is the superior state to be in.
After all, as our esteemed admin Distind says here (emphasis added):
'If love shy users get so upset at geting quoted, stop saying shit like this
Thoughtcrime. Sexcrime. Doubleplusungood. fschit, Room 101.
(Certainly being banned from that forum, thus becoming an unperson [/"1984"])
Ah, how the mere use of 'File' and 'Save Page As' on a browser (or at least 'Print Screen' and 'Paste' on Paint, then cropping the relevant parts & 'Save As', re. Shax's example) can completely annihilate someone, never mind their 'opinion'.
That's precisely why being Politically Correct
is the superior state to be in, as at least you preserve your good standing in society with reputation intact, as opposed to being thought of as a slimebag who's lower than the AIDS virus.
Don't so much as think
in such a way, and you'll never be caught actually having so much as a reputation/image-annihilating 'opinion', condemning yourself out of your own
mouth. Like Todd Akin, Richard Mourdoch & all their right-wing ilk (and not even Mitt The Tit Romney is innocent; not for nothing was he referred to as being 'born with a silver foot
in his mouth', re. his multiple gaffes), You're such a loss to the diplomatic corps, fschit.
Just as it wouldn't kill right-wing fundies if they all
-wing Atheists (as it wouldn't kill ALL evil dictators to become more like the Dalai Lama), it wouldn't kill ALL misogynists to become women-respecting
people: normal, decent, civilised, human men possessing what makes them normal, decent, civilised, sane men: self-control.
Here endeth the lesson.
*- There's historical evidence to suggest that "Robin Hood", or (in Ye Olde English) 'Robyn Hode', was an advertising
story invented by the guild of textile manufacturers & colourers (Nottingham was the centre of the cloth dyeing trade in medieval Britain), spread via storytellers (paid by said guild) far & wide so as to spread the word of their fine clothing etc, so as the merchants could sell their wares, via the 'metaphor' of a heroic former nobleman who did good deeds for the poor. The notion of Robin wearing 'Lincoln Green
' is a misnomer; merely a mistranslation of post-Saxon early English 'Lincoln Graine
', which is actually the colour Red.
**- In prisons here in the UK, the practice of institutionalised rape doesn't exist (despite that notorious scene in the film "Scum"
); even rapists (of either gender, but especially of men against women) are referred to as 'Nonces', who - along with paedophiles - are considered the lowest of the low by the rest of the prison's inmates, and usually given the broken glass/faeces in the food/bed, urine in the drinks, and beatings in the showers/shankings in the exercise yard treatment (with the prison guards 'looking the other way'). But that's uncommon these days, as 'Nonces' are kept in a separate wing from the rest of the prison population, therefore the prison-originated acronym 'N
xercise': NONCE, which has entered the lingua franca
to refer to the likes of Gary Glitter, Jonathan King, Jimmy Savile et al: Paedophiles.