The Democrat pond scum who keep complaining over the measly $1.5 million Congress has spent in defending DOMA have no one to blame but themselves. If Leftist would quit attacking DOMA, ZERO dollars would be needed to defend it. Now, even more will be spent defending it, thanks to the barbarians.
31 comments
If you had just removed law that obviously goes against human rights, ZERO dollars would be needed to defend it.
So, the barbarians are the ones who want to include all people in the concept of human rights, not just the people you aprove of?
And who..
oh sod it.
Stop crying.
Hold the presses! The other side has the audacity to have an opinion and stand up for it!
Nah, let's not blame each other for process costs, let's blame Christianity, after all the idea that homosexuality was bad didn't exist in Western Culture before it. So there you go, if you want to stop spending money, get rid off Christianity.
See, I can pull bullshit out of my ass too.
Sure, and by that logic if the founding fathers' ancestors had just stayed in England zero blood would have been shed in the revolution and zero hardships would have faced Americans (because Americans wouldn't even exist). And best yet (for the Freepers, not for me), there would be no president Obama.
If you get rid of DOMA, then 0 dollars would be needed to defend it.
Funny how conservatives think that they need to cut funding to PBS because they think it's a drain on the budget, but think nothing on spending millions of dollars to keep some people from marrying who they want.
If the Republic pond scum who keep complaining about the 1.5 million defending DOMA had not passed DOMA ZERO dollars would be needed to defend it. Now, even more will be spent defending it, thanks to the barbarians.
Awww, you're sad because it was found to be unconstitutional? Suck it.
@[u]fishtank
I want them to keep crying, conservatard tears are so tasty.
Yeah, and if the people of Iraq and Afghanistan would just have laid down and surrendered, Baby Bush would have been remembered as a hero rather than as a colossal screw-up.
People are not always going to bow to your bullying fwdude. Deal with it.
But see that's the thing. DOMA shouldn't be defended at all, mainly because it's unconstitutional for one, and secondly because it deprives a population segment of benefits enjoyed by other hardworking Americans simply because of a basis of sexual orientation.
If we did that, then we would also have ZERO dollars pissed away in "defense", but since some revolting, well, pond scum (thanks for the term!) are more concerned with supporting bigotry and dishonestly masquerading it as a support for the economy...
"Now, even more will be spent defending it ...'
But it won't be the government (i.e., me and other taxpayers) spending the money. It will be you homophobes. And the sooner you go financially bankrupt (to match being morally and intellectually bankrupt), the better off we sane people will be.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.