Well there are two types of evolution: macroevolution, which is much easier to accept, and microevolution.
The key with macroevolution is taking the evidence and extrapolating a pattern.
Microevolution is more about taking the theory of evolution and trying to assert it is happening currently in a certain species over a very limited amount of data from genetic divergence within a control group over time period significantly less than what should be used to determine if evolution is occurring.
[LOL, macro and micro refer to our perspective of the event, not the process. Don't start this tired shit. Microevolution -is- macroevolution. Titl the lens into closer focus, pan out over wider focus. End of.]
Going back and forth between genetic changes is not what I call evolution. Just because a species is undergoing Darwinian mechanisms does not mean it is really experiencing evolution.
Polaris, Atheist Forums 45 Comments
[11/6/2012 12:46:20 PM]
Fundie Index: 54
Submitted By: Stimbo