Anyone that thinks a marriage is defined by another man having anal sex with another man, or a woman strapping on a dildo and having sex with another woman.......well they ain’t playing with a full deck.
No sane society votes for this garbage. Any state that has citizens with an ounce of morality and decency votes AGAINST this degenerate, immoral crap. North Carolina is a prime example. When sodomite “marriage” is passed in any Southern state the fags will have reason to rejoice. It ain’t gonna happen.
65 comments
The problem is, in all that, there is not a single sound reason to be opposed to marriage for homosexual couples.
Morality, decency? Pretty flimsy reasons, considering they change.
So, as long as those guys don't come up with any reasonable argument, they will have to resort to fear-mongering.
Anyone that thinks a marriage is defined by another man having anal sex with another man, or a woman strapping on a dildo and having sex with another woman.......
No, I don't think that defines marriage.
I think marriage is defined by two people who love each other enough to make a formal commitment.
I must say that when I was married in a civil ceremony in the uk (ie no religion involved), neither my wife nor I were ever required to declare anything about the finer details of our penetrative options, nor were we asked to provide any details of any additional equipment we were likely to employ.
I think that you may be wrong about this.
First, that's a very limit idea of what homosexuals get up to... and shows that KKP_Vet thinks sex involves sticking a dick into something.
Second, if sex is what doesn't define marriage, then the whole argument that Gays can't reproduce is a non-starter...
We don't expect you inbred idiots* to vote for same-sex marriage laws in the Southern states. We expect the Supreme Court to rule that it is a civil rights violation for you to deny marriage equality to Gays and force you to change your laws.
*(disclaimer I was born and continue to live in the south myself)
Anyone that thinks a marriage is defined by another man having anal sex with another man, or a woman strapping on a dildo and having sex with another woman
No, that's called sex. Marriage is a contract between two adults to share responsibilities and resources. Sex=/=marriage.
Anyone that thinks a marriage is defined by another man having anal sex with another man, or a woman strapping on a dildo and having sex with another woman
That's not the definition of marriage, that's the definition of gay sex.
I think it's telling that you equate marriage with sex.*
When sodomite “marriage” is passed in any Southern state the fags will have reason to rejoice. It ain’t gonna happen.
It will happen when the Supreme Court finally rules that bans on gay marriage are unconstitutional. But of course the South will refuse to accept it even though they have to, and gay people will continue to be treated with the same hatred & discrimination that blacks have been subjected to.
*Especially when those of us who have been married for a while know not to expect sex. :)
Marriage is a legal contract, about mutual economy and inheritance. It has nothing (or very little) to do with sex. Many sane societies have already voted for "this garbage", and nothing bad has happened to any of us, to date.
If lesbians were interested in dildos, they wouldn't be lesbians, stupid. You must have watched too much Special movies, dearie.
"No sane society votes for this garbage. Any state that has citizens with an ounce of morality and decency votes AGAINST this degenerate, immoral crap."
Please explain, in as succinct a manner as possible and without invoking unsubstantiated entities (i.e., gods), what makes such things "degenerate, immoral crap".
If your answer contains unsubstantiated, unsupported, outlandish, or just factually wrong claims, or your answer boils down to "I think it's icky" then you're a fucking moron and you need to sit down and shut up.
"North Carolina is a prime example. When sodomite 'marriage' is passed in any Southern state the fags will have reason to rejoice. It ain’t gonna happen."
I'm pretty sure your Southern States said something similar about slavery being banned, about losing the Civil War, and about interracial marriage.
You guys are wrong more often than not about these things, just so you know.
Morality is defined by social codes. But above these social codes is the universal right to love. Marriage is a civil, pragmatic and spiritual notion, but in this case the spiritual notion is directly tied to MarylandBear's statement that marriage is a formal commitment (at the civil and pragmatic levels) but may stem from the spiritual (for lack of a better word) aspect love. And this transcends all laws as it is universal. However, social order needs to be upheld, and in my opinion NKP_Vet's statement appears to be going against it.
"Anyone that thinks a marriage is defined by another man having anal sex with another man, or a woman strapping on a dildo and having sex with another woman.......well they ain’t playing with a full deck."
I agree with this. Marriage is defined by an agreement between two consenting adults, not by what those two consenting adults do that's none of your business. The rest of your statement is crap.
"Anyone that thinks integration is defined by a black person having equal rights with a white person, or a white woman having sex with a black man.......well they ain’t playing with a full deck.
No sane society allows for this garbage. Any state that has citizens with an ounce of morality and decency is FOR this degenerate, immoral crap. North Carolina is a prime example. When 'equal ruights is alloweded in any Southern state the nigger-lovers will have reason to rejoice. A black man in the White House? It ain’t gonna happen. "
NKPVet's father, speaking on 16th November 1952
'No sane society votes for this garbage' you say...?:
image
That was in 2001. I wonder why Holland hasn't suffered any natural disasters, nor any 9/11 equivalents; and there was no gay marriage allowed in the US before that day in New York...!
"Anyone that thinks a marriage is defined by another man having anal sex with another man, or a woman strapping on a dildo and having sex with another woman.......well they ain’t playing with a full deck."
Anyone who thinks that voting against marriage will stop any of this from happening with extreme frequency ain't playing with a full deck.
So you think marriage is only about sex?
Let's see if you feel that way after you've been married for awhile.
Of course, if I were married to someone like you I might choose the 'chick with a strap-on' option too. Perhaps your wife already has...I'm sure her sex life has improved dramatically.
Obviously same-sex marriage isn't about same-sex, sex, because gay people are having sex outside of marriage anyway. To them marriage is defined as a lifelong commitment to be with the person you love until death do you part. I can see why you would have trouble understanding that because within your fundamentalist Christian bubble marriage is just a permission slip from the Church saying you can now have sex in the missionary position for the purposes of procreation. No wonder you guys have such massive divorce rates, you base your marriages on the fleeting biological desire to fuck instead of love.
Why are we godless heathens the only ones who think of marriage and sex as two different things?
You ask some married couples, the two are almost mutually exclusive even.
"Anyone that thinks a marriage is defined by another man having anal sex with another man, or a woman strapping on a dildo and having sex with another woman......."
That's what marriage comes down to for these people. Sex and nothing else. Minds down the gutter, and they complain about the immorality of others. Tsk, tsk.
@KittyKaboom
"Of course, if I were married to someone like you I might choose the 'chick with a strap-on' option too. Perhaps your wife already has...I'm sure her sex life has improved dramatically."
Call it a hunch, but I suspect that the Freeper is single. Of course, if I'm wrong they'd both benefit from her using the strap-on option. On him. He'd be a lot more mellow after :P
To be honest with you, I NEVER expect a southern state to ever approve gay marriage on its own. But, the day will come when the SCOTUS will slam it down your throats. I can just imagine the howls of indignation on that day.
They'll probably be almost as loud as the howls of indignation following Brown v. Topeka Board of Education.
I've been fighting you fucking retards my entire life and I'm not done yet.
Anyone that thinks that marriage is defined by a man having sex with a woman in the traditional missionary position is ALSO not playing with a full deck.
Marriage isn't defined as simply "having sex". If it was then there'd be no such thing as adultery, because you'd be married to someone the moment you had sex with them.
Not all woman-woman sex involves a strap-on.
Not all gay male sex involves anal.
Not all hetero-sex involves vaginal penetration with a penis.
Why shouldn't gay people (men and women) suffer through marriage like the rest of us ?
@Thinking Allowed
I'm assuming you're counting Minnesota among those four, but that's not necessarily true.
Yes, we curb-stomped the Constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage, but that's only the first step. Statutory law in the state already defines marriage as strictly between a man and a woman, so we have to take care of that before you can say that Minnesota fully "approves" of Same-Sex marriage.
The Amendment was a political stunt designed to get more people to vote, and it backfired spectacularly: both it and the voter i.d. amendment failed, the Dems retook the both the state House and Senate, and even Michelle Bachmann only held on to her own House seat by the skin of her teeth.
All causes for celebration, yes, but there is still a lot of hard work to be done.
That's because the Southern states are backwards cesspools of poverty, hate, and ignorance, yet the uneducated jackasses like you who tend to inhabit them are delusional and arrogant enough to consider themselves "sane" society and believe that others are "degenerate" and "ain't playing with a full deck." Hilarious and pathetic.
My opinion of The South and Southerners as a whole is on par with Headache's opinion of Americans in general (as if that weren't already blindingly obvious). I wish that weren't the case, but it becomes increasingly difficult to believe the majority of Southerners are decent people when you live in the South and you're constantly surrounded by bigotry, hatred, willful ignorance, blatant anti-intellectualism, and vicious rabid anger incited by anything resembling social progress. Meeting intelligent and reasonable people here is almost like finding an oasis in the middle of a desert rather than a mundane, everyday occurrence.
"Anyone that thinks a marriage is defined by another man having anal sex with another man, or a woman strapping on a dildo and having sex with another woman.......well they ain’t playing with a full deck.
"
No one defines marriage in that way. It is actually you people who think about things like that when the topic of two men or two woman who love each other and want to get married comes up.
America's new flag should just be a giant, stretched out anus, being sodomized by five other anuses, preferably Muslim or Chinese anuses.
Anyone that thinks a marriage is defined by another man having anal sex with another man, or a woman strapping on a dildo and having sex with another woman.......well they ain’t playing with a full deck.
You're absolutely right. Marriage is neither one of those things. Marriage is the union of two adults who wish to start a household together. That is all.
//Anyone that thinks a marriage is defined by another man having anal sex with another man, or a woman strapping on a dildo and having sex with another woman.......//
...has serious issues about his way of thinking of relationships and/or lacks of imagination
Anyone that thinks that marriage is not defined by two people of legal age who love each other and want to live with each other... well they are not playing with a full deck.
No sane society would judge people because they are different and keep groups from having the same rights everyone should have.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.