\"Homosexuality is deviant, simply because its unconfortable for most people. Thats what makes an act deviant or not. Something that isn't accepted by society.\"
Well, interracial relationships were \"uncomfortable for most people\" and not \"accepted by society\" in certain places and times. Guess that means they're \"wrong.\"
\"Raping a dog is as bad as owning it.\"
WTF WTF WTF? Having a pet = bestiality?
1/17/2006 12:08:32 PM
>Homosexuality is deviant, simply because its unconfortable for most people<
Have you tried using lube?
Also, I think Christianity is deviant. It makes me uncomfortable. If Christianity is not wrong, why isn't sacrificing virgins to Cthhulu wrong? Why are we discriminating against Satanists? Either all religions have the same rights, or none. Pass me the butcher knife.
1/17/2006 12:11:24 PM
A-G is right! we should go back the the good old times when we lynched interracial couples for deviant behaviour...
It's still deviant isn't it? Come'on I've got a noose and a flaming torch and everything, Lets go make society moral again!
1/17/2006 12:18:17 PM
Free the shit eaters today!
1/17/2006 1:50:02 PM
Comparing homosexuality to eating shit and raping dogs... lovely. :S
1/17/2006 3:22:56 PM
this is the first time i've been compared to a shit eater for being gay. THIS is why i love fstdt.
1/17/2006 3:33:58 PM
Dear Anti-Geek, I'm a lesbian, my dog is a boy Rottweiler, if I tried to rape him he'd chew my body into little slobbery pieces, so can I just sacrifice him to Cthulhu when he isn't looking?
1/17/2006 4:07:31 PM
Oh, Nekhbet and TammyFaye *huggles*
1/17/2006 4:27:31 PM
The Last Conformist
I wouldn't want to have a pet more dangerous than myself ...
On topic, there's got to be some kind of award for this. I've Got Double Standards And Am Proud Of It award?
1/17/2006 6:00:00 PM
I think there's some ominous undertones to this post: mob rules. It would be funny if it wasn't so freakin' scary.
1/17/2006 7:07:40 PM
this guy has got some serious issues. And \"Anti-Geek\"? Are we talking a classic bully, here? The only reasonable way for two men to touch each other is fighting and football, right?
1/17/2006 8:31:20 PM
TDR: Yep, I'm sure Anti-Geek loves nothing better than a LONG, HARD game of football; running around a field with a bunch of big, sweaty guys, occasionally giving your team mates a pat on their firm, sculpted ass in celebration. Then when it's all over it's time to strip down and all pile together into a steaming hot shower room and lather up...
1/17/2006 8:43:49 PM
\"Racism is against humans rights.
So the employer should hire the black or female no matter what. \"
That's racist and sexist. You should hire the employee because they have the best skills- not because of their race or gender.
Oooh, and Anti-Geek,
discrimination=wrong. Anti-gay= discrimination. Anti-Geek=idiot.
1/17/2006 8:56:14 PM
A dog once tried to hump my leg. Will it end up in hell now?
1/17/2006 8:59:57 PM
I am so sick of the fricken fundies and their attacks on everyone... Waving their bibles, shouting we're all going to burn... Well I'll be sure to spit on them from heaven while they're burning in hell :-)
1/17/2006 10:37:22 PM
That's ... remarkably stupid.
First of all, doctor Ingebog Ward did a study in the 70s that provided strong evidence that sexual behaviour can be influenced by the chemical environment in the mother's blood.
Secondly, yes, I'm all for people who eat faeces being free to do that on their own time and in private. Others should not discriminate against them. I utterly fail to see how that is related to how well one can perform one's job or one's role in society.
As for people exposing themselves in public, that begins infringing on the rights of others. Kissing a person of the same gender is no more wrong than kissing a person of the opposite gender. In many societies, a kiss is a gesture of affection meant to show closeness. It is not necessarily restricted to something between lovers.
Dogs have no legal standing to sign contracts. Once a dog can be proven to understand language, I'm all for it being given legal standing, which would give it the ability to sign a contract.
They do, however, have legal protections. Animal cruelty laws, first of all, and there are plenty of them.
Forcing people to accept my \"style of life\"? I really don't care one way or the other what any other person thinks, so long as that person doesn't try to impose his morality on me. I do, however, believe that I should have the right to pursue legal action against those who harass me about such silly things as sexual orientation. Now, whether that's a protected status or not is up for debate, but discrimination of any kind should be covered by discrimination laws, regardless of how fashionable it is to like or hate some minority.
These words would fall on deaf ears, even if the original poster read them. Oh well. They still bear saying.
1/18/2006 6:02:42 AM
Christianity is deviant for the majority of the Earth's population. I guess it should be outlawed then, right?
1/18/2006 8:44:11 AM
Yes, homosexuality is unnatural. That's why there aren't any examples of non-human homosexuality. Certainly, there aren't observed examples among dozens or even hundreds of different species.
1/19/2006 10:12:37 PM
Dogs understand language, like 'sit', 'come', 'stay', and 'treat'.
1/20/2006 5:49:59 PM
Darth Wang - That's a far cry from understanding *language*. It's more like conditioning, really. Pavlov's dogs and all that, just on a slightly more complex level. Dogs have not yet been demonstrated to be self-aware using the standard tests, which also counts rather strongly against them in the ability-to-sign-contracts area of law.
1/22/2006 4:54:48 AM
Some gay supporter put my post in here. Thank you. Well if you can't understand a comparssion between the freedom of eating shit in public and a the freedom of being gay then don't say stupid things like \"Free the shit eaters today\". My point was - at what extend must you accept individuality. Second is homesexualitly natural? You can answer \"Yes because animals do it\". \"Ok. animals eat shit\". \"Lets eat shit!\" (I can see another free the shit eaters coming in). Natural as in - leading to the evolution of life. If a species sexual relantionship can't create life is it right? The person who put my post in here said \"You can always grow humans in laboratories\". Pathetic. If all of us were christians, the human life would continue to exist. If all of us were gay... that wouldn't happen. Its not natural if it can't lead to the cycle of life. And gay parenting is just wrong. Are you going to tell me that a kid having two gay parents won't be outcast and mocked lets say about 80% of the cases? The kid will develop traumas and have a different vision of his sexual orientation. Why must I be forced to accept homosexuals if in all my life, everything pointed out that homosexuality isn't a normal behaviour? At school, at work, at church, at kindergarden... This site is just lol. You gay supproters are rotflol. \"Either you accept homosexuality or I'll put your post in a stupid site and we'll all mock you\".
And more... im not a bully like some asshole said. And I don't eat shit like some asshole might joke about it. And Im not homophobic. I just don't agree with homosexuality as a behaviour.
Hell.. Im as fundie as you are. I believe that homosexuality is not right as a behaviour chosed freely. You all say - accept homosexuality or you'll be a fundie. That is being a fundie in my book. You defend with your guts the ideia that society must accept homos.
1/31/2006 3:39:17 PM
\"If a species sexual relantionship can't create life is it right?\"
Sure. In chimpanzees, for example, homosexuality serves to help bond the group and reduce competition between group members.
\"If all of us were christians, the human life would continue to exist. If all of us were gay... that wouldn't happen.\"
If this were true, there wouldn't be such a thing as gay parenting.
\"Are you going to tell me that a kid having two gay parents won't be outcast and mocked lets say about 80% of the cases?\"
So will 99.9% of the fat kids. So, according to your logic, having a fat kid is \"just wrong\".
1/31/2006 6:43:27 PM
Look buddy, your post wasn't put up here because you hate gay people, no, it was put up here because of the way you expressed that opinion (Comparing gay people to corprophilliacs, random capitialization, somewhat of a skewed view of racial tolerance, the comment about raping/owning a dog, and overall acting like a huge, steaming cuntrag.) In short you are not a fundie for the opinion you hold, but for the, ahem, unique way you choose to express it.
Now please either start posting in a coherent manner or run along back to your football shower room.
1/31/2006 7:39:57 PM
Run along to your football shower locker room
You people... just... You remind me of Michael Moore. A fat ass with the ideia he can point what is right and wrong and mock without knowing he's even worst with his lame ass atitude \"I have something to say so all you ear me out as I show in a sarcastic way some things about the world and funny quotes\"
You don't understand the point of my post - I was refering to where does our individuality stops. Im not comparing directly eating shit with homesexuality. Im saying that if we must respect one's individuality must we respect men who eat shit in public? Men who marries a dog (its possible since someone has legally married a dolphin)?
Run along to your gootball shower locker room - what a fuck does that suppose to mean? - That I play football? That I shower? That I shower with other people under the same roof? So what? Screw this.
1/31/2006 11:17:08 PM
Actually if you scroll up on the comments page, you'll find that I had made a comment insinuated you were a closet homosexual by expounding that you probably loved to play football.
>>Im saying that if we must respect one's individuality must we respect men who eat shit in public? Men who marries a dog<<
Now you see, here's where your little metaphor fails, eating shit in a public place is an extreme health hazard as there are many diseases that can be directly transmitted via contact with human fecal matter, mister turd muncher is putting those around him at risk of catching these diseases by having his tasty snack in public. However there are no known diseases that can be transmitted by the sight of two men locking lips.
Your little comparison between gay marriage and bestiality also falls short because an adult male can give informed consent if propositioned for sex by another like-minded adult male, wheras an animal (in this case a dog) is incapable of giving informed consent, thus any sexual activities engaged with said animal would be classified under the label of 'statutory rape'.
>>You people... just... You remind me of Michael Moore. A fat ass with the ideia he can point what is right and wrong and mock without knowing he's even worst with his lame ass atitude \"I have something to say so all you ear me out as I show in a sarcastic way some things about the world and funny quotes\"<<
Pot, meet kettle. Also, if you'll notice my (in your own words) \"Witty quotes\" were inter-spliced with an explanation as to why your quote was featured here.
In conclusion: Your argument is bad and you should feel bad too!
1/31/2006 11:40:29 PM