1
#11014
Bum
I like how they don't even give me a chance to prove them wrong. What, did they think I'd interrupt them in the middle of their writing or something?
1/18/2006 4:28:46 AM
#11020
Cthulhu's Quill
ArcherX rapes children and sheep. If it doesn't then they can come and prove me wrong right here....
Oh, wait, they can't. I knew that would happen.
1/18/2006 5:38:59 AM
#11021
Jeremy PC
I don't understand this fundie mindset. Is it just stupidity, or is it lying to say that \"...science is proving God everyday\"?
1/18/2006 5:41:21 AM
#11025
Julian
oh no. NOT THIS GUY!!!!
All he ever does is play I am rubber you are glue.
I WISH I WAS KIDDING...
The imbecile nearly gave me a stroke before Christmas. Darn apoplexy!
1/18/2006 5:57:45 AM
#11031
Crosis
<<< Actually studies lead to a deeper faith in God and science is proving God everyday >>>
That must be why a greater percentage of scientists (particularly astrophysicists, who would know more about how the universe works than anyone else) are atheists than just about any other profession.
1/18/2006 6:04:18 AM
#11038
glyptodon
\"Is it just stupidity, or is it lying to say that '...science is proving God everyday'?\"
No, I think that people do genuinely have the impression that science \"proves\" a lot of their beliefs. It seems to be regurgitated urban-legend style.
1/18/2006 7:03:06 AM
#11046
Phil
\"the fact that God created us \"is easier\" to believe than that rubbish you have faith in, because it is garbage and just ridiculous.\"
Taking the grammar as written, he's absolutely correct.
1/18/2006 8:58:37 AM
#11055
TheAmazingToby
Good point. Why work for the truth when accepting a fairy tale is so much easier?
1/18/2006 12:49:51 PM
#11061
The Last Conformist
\"That must be why a greater percentage of scientists (particularly astrophysicists, who would know more about how the universe works than anyone else) are atheists than just about any other profession.\"
Do you have a reference for this? I was of the impression that astrophysicists were among the scientists more likely to be religious, and that the least religious ones were the biologists.
1/18/2006 1:39:49 PM
#11101
Rime
religioustolerance.org had some statistics, and someone else from snopes.com forums also had a statistics regarding scientists and their religious (or lack thereof) convictions.
1/18/2006 8:40:44 PM
#11102
Rime
ArcherX, you invoked \"Godwin's\" rule. You lose.
1/18/2006 8:41:28 PM
#11108
Crosis
<<< Do you have a reference for this? I was of the impression that astrophysicists were among the scientists more likely to be religious, and that the least religious ones were the biologists. >>>
I'll have to look, it's been a while since I've seen it. (You might be right about it, I do know for sure that physicists and especially astrophysicists were at one extreme. Pretty sure they were least likely to be religious, with biologists a close second, but I might be wrong.)
1/18/2006 10:06:57 PM
#11142
Julian
I agree with Crosis.
Both debunk Creationism, one explains the origin of life on Earth, the other the origin of Earth.
Astrophysicis is far more of a black art where only the truly gifted play.
1/19/2006 3:12:26 AM
#11225
TDR
\"Astrophysicis is far more of a black art where only the truly gifted play\"
well, shucks.
1/19/2006 9:25:29 PM
#11358
Darth Wang
He's just saying that because he's intellecutally incapable of understanding the necessary geology, biology, astronomy, or anything, so he just takes the lazy man's way and goes to religion.
1/20/2006 5:44:19 PM
1