I read this far...
When homosexual behavior manifests itself in society, it’s wonderful. But when it happens in the priesthood, it’s evil.
...and then stopped for fear that your idiocy would damage my brain.
1) The RCC sexual abuse scandals, like others of their type, concern the rape of minors.
2) The pedophiles responsible for these rapes are opportunists, targeting those individuals over whom they have the most power; those whom they could most easily groom and threaten.
3) The RCC is structured in such a way that most of the children under the direct supervision of priests for long periods of time are boys - and so boys were/are most often the opportune targets of sexual abuse in this milieu.
If most of those predator-priests had been permitted to marry, they would have chosen partners of the opposite sex because they find women sexually attractive. (Don't believe me? Take a gander at the IFB world where pastors marry and yet go on to attack children of both sexes anyway.)
So why would these men abuse boys in whom they have little if any real sexual interest? For the same reason as, for example, young men rape senior citizens or other women whom they find unattractive:
Rape is not about sex. Rape is about power.
If the pedophiles in question were actually homosexual, as opposed to their being merely opportunistic predators, they would not confine their same-sex activities to boys: They would date men. And yet most pedophiles who attack boys go on to date women.
In short, pedophiles who attack children of the same sex are usually not gay. Even if they are gay, however, that wouild simply put them on the exact same moral and legal footing as heterosexual pedophiles - no better and no worse.