Quote# 90964

@rizwan1981 Yup, all women would die in hospitals because their babies would kill them medically. This is a real danger - it happens 1 out of 7 billion times. That's a real, significant danger to women everywhere. Because I'm a liberal and I'm too f stupid to understand even the rudiments of probability. My head is squarely where all liberals heads are - up my fanny. Where it seems logical, probable, that babies kill their mothers and without legal abortion all women will die. That's logical to me. I'm a liberal.

SharnCedar, The Daily Beast 40 Comments [11/26/2012 8:20:06 AM]
Fundie Index: 43

Username  (Login)
Comment  (Text formatting help) 

1 2 | bottom

No, you're a stupid cunt.

11/26/2012 8:24:44 AM


God damn, you are a fucking stupid waste of oxygen.

11/26/2012 8:29:03 AM

dont pull mortality figures out of the air.
The real mortality rates for the us at 2009 are here.

"African American women suffer a death rate of 34.8 per 100,000 births in contrast to a death rate of 9.1 for white women and 10.2 for Hispanic women, according to the National Vital Statistics Report of April 2009"

Thats not horrendous but shows childbirth is a risk for the mother. In cases of extopic pregnancy , eclampsia and a few others the likelyhood of the infant surviving is low while the risk to the mother is high.

Of course having your wife and child die in the process puts you in Gods favor so I suppose thats a good thing.

11/26/2012 8:33:59 AM


Please don't take offence at this, but you're not actually trained in obstetrics are you?

11/26/2012 8:39:12 AM


A. They are not babies, they are blastocysts and embryos.
B. It is a "real, significant danger" if it's happening to you. Even more tragic in that it is an easily preventable death.

P.S. Removing your own head from your a&& should provide you with enough of a clear view that you could notice most liberals do not have their heads up their butts.

11/26/2012 8:55:18 AM

Arctic Knight

So where do you draw the line? Do we make a law when the odds are only 1 in 7 million? 1 in 7 thousand? 1 in 7 hundred? 1 in 70? 1 in 7? At what point do you draw the line that it is no longer acceptable to save a life?

11/26/2012 9:08:53 AM


That statistic is clear bullshit and here's why. There are 7 billion people alive today, half of those are female, and only a fraction of those are capable of having children. So according to your statistic we should basically almost never see a life threatening pregnancy. Except we do. All more common than you would like to think. It happened this month, and in that case the fetus was going to die anyway. Any logical, reasonable person would have concluded that an abortion was the only option. Unless you're "pro-life", in which case the only option is unnecessary death. Why kill one life to save another when you could do nothing and have double the death?

11/26/2012 9:15:55 AM


The fact that you deem ANY death by childbirth acceptable tells me all I need know about you.

11/26/2012 9:22:44 AM


I am in no way certain if you are using the word , "fanny", in the Ameriform or Britiform sense, but in either case, Sharncedar, you should try it, and get a better idea of what a stuck birth is like. (At a time when most deliveries were at home, most "stuck births" that did not end fatally for both did so for the neonate, since every attending physician carried decapitators and a big corkscrew, just in case a "destroying operation" had to be performed. If the decapitated head was left in the womb, it then had to be extracted piecemeal).

11/26/2012 9:46:14 AM


Clearly the only thing you got right in your post is the current location of your head.

11/26/2012 10:15:22 AM


For a cunt, you seem to have an incredibly piss poor understanding of the whole inception, gestation and birth process.

11/26/2012 10:19:06 AM


I'm to f stupid to understand even the rudiments of probability


The only one with their head up their "fanny" is you.

11/26/2012 10:20:57 AM


Flat what?

11/26/2012 10:21:56 AM


This cunt is in dire need of the services these gentlemen provide. Perhaps they could inscribe these statistics into their bats prior to beating SharnCedar upside the head with them.

11/26/2012 10:33:36 AM


You're another argument why abortion should be legal.

11/26/2012 10:47:43 AM

By the time she went looking for an abortion, it had already been determined as a certainty that neither she or the fetus would survive conception. Probability didn't factor into it, and your asspull numbers are way the hell off.

Instead of being able to save one life, the laws governing the medical system condemned them both to death. I guess adults just don't deserve the same rights to live as a clump of cells that has yet to attain self-awareness.

Now whose head is up their ass?

11/26/2012 10:48:02 AM

Mister Spak

There are only 7 billion people on earth, we need to make a huge deal out of one baby. Because we are stupid conservatives unable to understand mathematics, or to compare things of different scales. We can't distinguish between 50 million babies starving, many of them for the "crime" of being muslim, and one embryo dying in a hospital and taking an adult person with it. We conservatives pride ourselves on ignoring mathematics, rational thinking, and science. We make decisions by emotions, hysteria and the fear of making the giant man with a long white beard who lives on clouds angry. My head is squarely where all conservatives heads are - up my fanny. Where it seems logical, probable, that babies kill their mothers and without legal abortion all women will die. That's logical to me. I'm a conservative.

11/26/2012 11:03:11 AM

Hasan Prishtina

And Savita Halappanavar is the only women who ever died as a result of complications from pregnancy, killed by her fetus. Is it possible to be this stupid and still breathe?

11/26/2012 11:26:49 AM


You wouldn't know logic if it smacked you upside the head with a medical textbook.

11/26/2012 11:44:23 AM


The straw is the limit.

11/26/2012 12:17:14 PM


> it happens 1 out of 7 billion times <


It happens about once a minute. That's over 1000 times a day, and about half a million times a year. Very roughly, 1% of women die from complications from pregnancy.

Only 10%-20% of those would be saved by aborting the pregnacy. But that's still tens of thousands of women dying unnecessarily every year because abortions aren't performed. Most of those cases result from lack of access to medical care. But cases like Savita Halappanavar happen on a weekly basis in places where the only obstacle to saving their lives is doctors refusing to do their jobs. There is a problem there.

Information from World Health Organization Maternal Mortality reports, as indexed by Wikipedia.

11/26/2012 12:22:22 PM

The Crimson Ghost

I could cheerfully kick his "fanny". Then yank his balls off.

11/26/2012 12:53:13 PM


Where the f**k did you get that figure from? Hundreds of thousands of women die during pregnancy and delivery each year, hundreds die each day. We don't have to rely on probability, we can check actual facts.

All liberal heads are up YOUR fanny? No wonder you seem disturbed and too preoccupied to actually think.

Most women never have an abortion, stupid! Most people think abortions are bad, but maybe not as bad as the alternatives; bringing a badly deformed baby into the world, or letting both the woman and the fetus die when you can save the mother with an abortion, or letting a child who no-one will care for be born, only to starve to death in five years.

As I'm no Liberal, I'm a Socialist, I don't know exactly how a Liberal thinks, but I'd guess human rights and freedoms are rather important to most Liberals.

When you offer to take care of the millions of kids in the world who are not cared for or starving, then I might listen to you. Maybe...

11/26/2012 12:54:52 PM


Yup, liberals are the idiots. That's why most university professors are liberal.

11/26/2012 2:07:43 PM

Old Viking

This sequence of words makes so little sense it's like mental tapioca.

11/26/2012 3:24:57 PM

1 2 | top: comments page