Home Archives Random Quotes Latest Comments Top 100 Submit Quote Search Log In

Quote# 90967

[Could you please explain to me how arresting/executing homosexuals is any different than what the Nazi's did (arresting/executing Jews for what they perceived was the Jew's harm to society)?]

That's very easy. The leftist National Socialist German Workers Party genocide was largely motivated by evolutionary racism.[23] Anti-sodomy laws are based on righteous indignation and meant to protect society from sexual perverts and the disease, pederasty and other moral degeneracy they spread/promote. See: Homosexuality and health and Homosexuality and murders and Homosexuality and pederasty and Homosexuality and Illegal Drug Use and Homosexual circuit parties and disease and Homosexuality and bestiality and Causes of homosexuality. I hope that clears things up for you.

Conservative, Conservapedia 35 Comments [11/27/2012 12:22:22 AM]
Fundie Index: 38
WTF?! || meh
Username:
Comment:



1 2
Kitourahime

Nazis rounded up gays as well, OP. In essence, it's not 'like' what they did - it IS what they did. I don't think Godwin applies here, either.

11/26/2012 4:31:17 PM

Wehpudicabok

Translation:

"I'll just shift this problem onto your turf using the canard that Hitler was an evolutionist. Read my articles! One of them may even have a GIF of a flying kitty!!?!"

11/27/2012 12:34:09 AM

Indicible

Nazi party, leftist? Welcome to Conservapedia, where the real world stays at the door.

11/27/2012 1:04:57 AM



Okay, we can play that game, too. Let's look up the following, shall we?:

Heterosexuality and prostitution
Heterosexuality and pedophilia
Heterosexuality and STDs Heterosexuality and illegal drug use
Heterosexuality and promiscuity
Heterosexuality and teen/unwed pregnancy
Heterosexuality and adultery

Whew! Looks like we better start rounding up the straight people too, for the protection of society, doesn't it?


11/27/2012 2:37:11 AM

Passerby

That isn't describing how it was different, that's describing how it was exactly the bloody same. Tired old lies and slander and a bunch of crap about how it's for the good of society to purge the "undesired" from daily life.

Two factual errors: First, while Hitler espoused belief in a master race, he thought that was divine right, not evolution. Darwin's books as well as writings by others on the subject of natural evolution were banned. Second, the Nationalist Socialist Worker's party was rabidly opposed to socialism, trade unions, and other 'leftist' ideals. You morons have been stressing the wrong word in the party name, it was shmuckbait from the beginning. Deadly shmuckbait. First they came for the communists.

11/27/2012 2:37:45 AM

Paler_Face

The Nazis where extreme-right wing, not 'leftist', moron.
They weren't inspired by 'evolutionairy racism' Darwins 'On the origin of species' was banned in nazi germany, because it showed that Hitlers beloved Aryan race wasn't superior to those dirty jews, gypsies, and other non-aryans.
Also, gay does not equal pedofile. You still use that lie even though it's been refuted long ago.

11/27/2012 3:27:27 AM

Hasan Prishtina

Anti-semitic laws were based on "righteous indignation and meant to protect society from sexual perverts and the disease, pederasty and other moral degeneracy they spread/promote." Such "righteous indignation" was what Kristallnacht was all about.

Not only has Conservative not read the most basic Nazi texts about Jews, but hasn't the first idea about the history of anti-semitism.

11/27/2012 3:44:28 AM

Kuno

Oh, for fuck’s sake! The Nazis were fascists, not socialists! They had the word “social” and “worker” in their name to fool idiots that would only read the name and not look into the actual politics of the party. You know, idiots like you!

I still can’t really believe that after all these years there are still some morons falling for that. Let me guess, you think the North Korea is really a “people’s republic”, don’t you?

Also your list of “Homosexuality and…” sounds very much like the anti-Semitic propaganda the Nazis published. Say also said they wanted to protect society from the Jewish menace.

11/27/2012 3:49:49 AM

freako104

Conservapedia. The only thing it does well is failing.

11/27/2012 4:00:05 AM

Ebon

1) Nazism was on the right. You're just lying about that and should be beaten to death with a dictionary for it.
2) Hitler hated evolution and banned the teaching of it. His ideology had nothing to do with evolution. You're lying again.
3) Straight people are more likely to be child molesters than gay people, I actually know the stats on that because it's my job to know them.
4) Your subjective morality (yes, it's subjective even when it comes from a book) is no more valid than mine and mine has no problem with gay people.

11/27/2012 4:20:43 AM

Frostythesnowman

The Nazis are leftist now are they? I think a sprinkling of inaccuracy may have crept into this particular entry.

Now, I realise that Andy Shaftme has worked very hard to bring this glorious resource into the world, but I can't help wondering what Conservapedia is actually for? It isn't a source of any credible information, in fact most of it could be discredited by a 10 year old child. Perhaps it's ironic. A huge joke on the small percentage of the population who are stupid enough to believe this sort of nonsense?

Whatever it's for, it illustrates what can happen when an idiot has too much time on his hands.

11/27/2012 4:30:53 AM

fishtank

The initial question is a bit flawed, since my "cherished" ancestors arrested and killed homosexuals alongside jews. With the same language pf "perversion" etc.

So yeah.

Conservapedia knows fuckall, surprise.

11/27/2012 4:36:09 AM

Titania

"Anti-sodomy laws are based on righteous indignation and meant to protect society from sexual perverts and the disease, pederasty and other moral degeneracy they spread/promote." Except that homosexuality doesn't cause any of those things. About the only thing correct in this statement is "Anti-sodomy laws are based on righteous indignation." Should have stopped there.

11/27/2012 4:40:32 AM

farpadokly

This does not answer the question.

11/27/2012 4:40:34 AM

Woody

Yes, but those references are just previous examples of the insane ramblings of your own weak mind. Just writing your own drivel down and then quoting it does not make it the truth. Lying for Jebus is still lying.

Then again, this is conservapedia. This is normal for that site.

11/27/2012 4:52:41 AM

Mister Spak

The rightist National Socialist German Workers Party genocide was largely motivated by homos are icky. Thats why the put homos in death camps. When they finished with that they had a big party where they burned evolution books.

It's very easy to see that conservatives are Nazis.

11/27/2012 7:39:44 AM

Filin De Blanc

"Take a look at these articles filled with stuff I made up."

11/27/2012 7:46:17 AM

Deep Search

The Nazis targeted Jewish people out of prejudice. They told lies and blamed the Jews for society's ills to justify their prejudice and use them as a scapegoat.

Christians (and other shitty people) target GLBT people out of prejudice. They tell lies and blame the queers for society's ills to justify their prejudice and use them as a scapegoat.

See, you have so much in common. Also the Nazis targeted GLBT people, too. Two of a kind~

And, really, Conservapedia... Sourcing yourself? That's as bad as trying to use the bible to prove that the bible is true.

11/27/2012 8:04:07 AM

Swede

The Nazi's DID arrest and execute homosexuals, stupid.
The NSDAP was a right wing party. They just mixed in "worker" to entice the masses.
Evolution is the very opposite to racial biology.
Anti-sodomy laws have a very similar base as racism does, stupid, it's all about discrimination and hate-crimes.

I'd prefer citations with a leetle less bias in them, thank you very much.

11/27/2012 8:52:22 AM

Flah

Wow, you can almost hear the "doink" of cognitive dissonance in his head.

11/27/2012 10:00:38 AM

Seeker Lancer

It was motivated by social darwinism which has nothing to do with either evolution or (I know this will be hard to parse in your brain) Charles Darwin.

11/27/2012 12:07:40 PM

Doubting Thomas

Maybe you might want to find a reliable source for references instead of Conservapedia. Someone then might start taking you seriously. If quoting myself as an authority was a valid debating tactic, then I could win any & every argument.

11/27/2012 12:28:48 PM

Osiris

If you don't believe Andy Schlafly then maybe you should read all of these things he wrote. Just so you can know beyond any reasonable doubt how full of shit he is.

11/27/2012 12:46:50 PM

JSS

Awww. I'm sorry. We can't accept Conserapedia biased wiki pages as valuable reasons to persecute because, well, the owner is kind of a nutcase and a half, the site elevates scripture to the level of scientific findings (not to mention rewrites scripture), uses anectdotal evidence (suggesting that the likes of Jeffery Dahmer are the typical gay person), and the site prides itself in it's preoccupation with all things homosexual, despite hating homosexuality. We simply can't take it seriously.

Case in point: Let's take a look at the interests of your frequenters:

Main Page? [1,906,729]
2. Homosexuality? [1,572,713]
3. Homosexuality and Hepatitis? [517,086]
4. Homosexuality and Promiscuity? [420,687]
5. Gay Bowel Syndrome? [389,052]
6. Homosexuality and Parasites? [388,123]
7. Homosexuality and Domestic Violence? [365,888]
8. Homosexuality and Gonorrhea? [331,553]
9. Homosexuality and Mental Health? [291,179]
10. Homosexuality and Syphilis? [265,322

Oh wow. I see we've got quite a theme going on here! Well, I'd share this interest too, if I was planning on doing the whole 'truck stop' thing.

Now if you could just begone, preferably to a nation adamant on staying in a dark age, say, Saudi Arabia, we'd all be much obliged. You and your wiki that trashes the suffix 'pedia' were never worthy of consideration or respect. I personally can't help but feel embarrassed for anybody who actually cites a page from this wiki thinking it's a reputable source, and I'm sure any reputable professor would agree.

11/27/2012 1:29:18 PM

\m/>_<\m/

frosty wins this page's understatement category. even the most inflappable 19th century british lord couldn't have one-upped that!

11/27/2012 4:11:20 PM
1 2