Home Archives Random Quotes Latest Comments Top 100 Submit Quote Search Log In

Quote# 91102

The fundamental realization of the Dark Enlightenment is that all men are not created equal, not individual men, nor the various groups and categories of men, nor are women equal to men, that these beliefs and others like them are religious beliefs, that society is just as religious as ever it was, with an official state religion of progressivism, but this is a new religion, an evil religion, and, if you are a Christian, a demonic religion.

The Dark Enlightenment does not propose that leftism went wrong four years ago, or ten years ago, but that it was fundamentally and terribly wrong a couple of centuries ago, and we have been heading to hell in a handbasket ever since at a rapidly increasing rate – that the enlightenment was dangerously optimistic about humans, human nature, and the state, that it is another good news religion, telling us what we wish to hear, but about this world instead of the next.

...

And if you let such people, inferior people, vote, they will always vote against other people’s rights and other people’s property, being themselves incapable of exercising rights, and themselves too feckless and destructive to have nice things. If they vote, they vote to drag everyone down to their own subhuman level, a desire politicians are eager to fulfill.

And if God created woman, he created woman to be a help meet for man. And if the blind forces of natural selection shaped women, they shaped women to function in a role profoundly unequal to her husband and her father, for in the ancestral environment, women were completely dependent upon men, resulting a female psychology that is apt to produce bad results for independent women, as is readily observable as one walks past a fertility clinic and looks at the clientele going in and out.

Jim, Jim's Blog 59 Comments [12/4/2012 4:35:53 AM]
Fundie Index: 63
WTF?! || meh
Username:
Comment:



1 2 3
Titania

". . . they will always vote against other people’s rights and other people’s property . . ." You mean the way you would vote against other people's rights? And as an independent woman, go fuck yourself.

12/4/2012 4:48:39 AM

Filin De Blanc

Dark Enlightenment? How positively supervillainish.

12/4/2012 5:05:29 AM

Reynardine

Maybe this guy can't spell. I think it was supposed to be Jim's Glob.

12/4/2012 5:07:59 AM

Reynardine

Also, there is no such thing as Dark Enlightenment. The proper term for it is Benightment.

12/4/2012 5:09:51 AM

Argle Bargle

Great idea, let's go back to the Middle Ages!

You go first.

EDIT: I've just checked his blog. The guy is a full blown Social Darwinist. Yuck.

12/4/2012 5:19:08 AM

Leighton Buzzard

Jim hangs round fertility clinics. Creepy.

12/4/2012 5:25:25 AM

fishtank

So it has been a while since your last blowjob, right?

12/4/2012 5:35:57 AM

Hasan Prishtina

"And if the blind forces of natural selection shaped women, they shaped women to function in a role profoundly unequal to her husband and her father for in the ancestral environment, women were completely dependent upon men"

Tell that to the unmarried women and widows that disease and war left behind.

12/4/2012 5:42:38 AM

Doubting Thomas

but this is a new religion, an evil religion, and, if you are a Christian, a demonic religion.

OK, WTF is it with Christians these days labeling anything they don't like as a demonic religion? I mean seriously. I've heard evolution, abortion, liberalism, atheism, environmentalism, and I don't know what else being called religions.

And if you let such people, inferior people, vote, they will always vote against other people’s rights and other people’s property, being themselves incapable of exercising rights, and themselves too feckless and destructive to have nice things. If they vote, they vote to drag everyone down to their own subhuman level

You mean conservatives?

12/4/2012 6:01:34 AM

Raised by Horses

Dark Enlightenment? What? Are we rifling though the fantasy fiction section for quotes now?

(And while we're at it, how the hell can 'enlightenment' be dark?)

12/4/2012 6:21:28 AM

UHM

They really fucked up the definition of religion, the latest outing of Bill O'Reilly as total fucktard is just more of what they have been doing for years. Here's simple rule: if there's something mythological or supernatural about it, it's a religion (de facto, not de jure), if there's nothing supernatural about it, it is an ideology. Evil liberal definition? Got it from a priest.

Actually, if you take a close look at how less technological advanced societies live around the world (those who who don't even use farming) men and women often live in a kind of symbiosis. While men go hunting, women don't just "watch camp" but also go collecting. Fruits and wood - things men couldn't live without either are often collected by the women.
And if you really think about it, you can live without meat, without fruit though...

12/4/2012 6:22:50 AM

Frostythesnowman

I bet Jim posted this during a raging storm with the room lit only by a flickering candle.

Of course it's utter nonsense, but impressively creepy.

12/4/2012 6:23:04 AM

Mister Spak

Dark Enlightenment? Is that like Free Slavery? Or Ignorant Education?

12/4/2012 7:00:42 AM

LAchlan

Inferior people? In who's eyes? You're a despicable excuse for a man.

12/4/2012 7:09:00 AM



Da fundamenstrual realization of tha Dark Enlightenment is dat all pimps is not created equal, not individual men, nor tha various crews n' categoriez of men, nor is dem hoes equal ta men, dat these beliefs n' others like em is religious beliefs, dat society is just as religious as ever it was, wit a straight-up legit state religion of progressivizzle yo, but dis be a freshly smoked up religion, a evil religion, and, if yo ass be a Christian, a demonic religion.

Da Dark Enlightenment do not propose dat leftizzle went wrong four muthafuckin years ago, and ten muthafuckin years ago yo, but dat it was fundamentally n' terribly wrong a couple centuries ago, n' our crazy-ass asses have been headin ta hell up in a handbasket ever since at a rapidly increasin rate â€" dat tha enlightenment was dangerously optimistic bout humans, human nature, n' tha state, dat it aint nuthin but another phat shizzle religion, spittin some lyrics ta our asses what tha fuck our crazy-ass asses wish ta hear yo, but bout dis ghetto instead of tha next.

12/4/2012 7:09:36 AM



...

And if yo ass let such gangstas, inferior gangstas, vote, they will always vote against other gangstas’s muthafuckin rightz n' other gangstas’s property, bein themselves incapable of exercisin muthafuckin rights, n' themselves too feckless n' destructizzle ta have ill thangs. If they vote, they vote ta drag everyone down ta they own subhuman level, a desire suckas is eager ta fulfill.

And if Dogg created biatch, he created biatch ta be a help hook up fo' man. I aint talkin' bout chicken n' gravy biatch fo' realz. And if tha blind forcez of natural selection shaped women, they shaped dem hoes ta function up in a role profoundly unequal ta her homeboy n' her father, fo' up in tha izzlestral environment, dem hoes was straight-up dependent upon men, resultin a female psychologizzle dat be apt ta produce bad thangs up in dis biatch fo' independent women, as is readily observable as one struttz past a fertilitizzle clinic n' looks all up in tha clientele goin up in n' out.

12/4/2012 7:10:15 AM

D Laurier

Racist, classist, sexist, paternalistic, authoritarian, bullshit.

12/4/2012 7:11:36 AM

MockAE

Forget all the horseshit -- just come out and say it. You're a misogynist. Mummy didn't give you your fire engine when you were four and you've hated women ever since as a way of getting back at her.

It's OK to say it. Then we can all just ignore you without having to sieve through the excrement you're shovelling first.

12/4/2012 7:14:38 AM

xyz

"Boo hoo, I am superior to women and I want them dependent on me!"

> in the ancestral environment, women were completely dependent upon men, resulting a female psychology that is apt to produce bad results for independent women
So you want women depending on you? You're one selfish little dick.

> as is readily observable as one walks past a fertility clinic and looks at the clientele going in and out.
What the fuck does this have to do with independence?

12/4/2012 7:22:00 AM

Deep Search

Someone doesn't understand history or how society works if they truly believe women are simply dependent on men and men aren't dependent on women. Men have never "brought home the bacon" while women did diddly squat. That's a fantasy. Even when men tried really hard to keep women "in their place." Women do a lot more than most people ever realize and right in the face of adversity.

And I'm pretty sure men have always been aces at voting against other people's rights and pulling for whatever benefits them most while screwing everybody else. It's always about holding onto that power.

12/4/2012 7:44:10 AM

Horsefeathers

Dark enlightenment?

Is that supposed to be clever? I can't tell.

12/4/2012 7:52:10 AM

The Crimson Ghost

I admit-I like the phrase "dark enlightenment". Sounds like a bad D&D spell.

As for the rest of this crap-Jim can kiss my ass.

12/4/2012 7:57:07 AM

Papabear

So, what you're saying is "I'm an ignorant and stupid person. Pay no attention to my opinion as I'm an a&&hat."

12/4/2012 8:31:10 AM

Hypersapien

If we created a society where only intelligent, compassionate people were allowed to vote, you would not be on the voter rolls.

12/4/2012 8:47:31 AM

Fundies Make Me Sick

Ironic in places, wrong in everything it says.

12/4/2012 8:50:56 AM
1 2 3