Quote# 91166

I’m all for feminism, I only wish it would hurry up already and finish off what’s left of this pathetic society. The sooner this entire shithouse goes up in flames, the sooner I can start a roaming band of warlords.

Our mission: destroy and suppress all technological invention in the new world order. We need to go back and stay in the stone age. The only rule of law will be force. Secondly, we’d have to invent a religion that forbade all forms of independent thinking other than death and destruction, in order to prevent this mess called “society” from ever occuring again. All the rich fuckers who enslave us, we shall eat them and their babies. Anyone who spends time inventing shit, we’ll feed to the lions and watch them die slowly and painfully. The only men that will rise to the top won’t be rich, they’ll be the mericiless, ruthless, remorseless brutal killing machines. The only babies that will be born in the new dawn, we’ll be born to our women slaves, that way we can keep the population under control. Only the strong and ruthless will breed, all else will parish and die. Society and it’s weakness will be purged, it’s only a matter of time….. just look at the Taliban if you don’t believe me. But we should do better than the Taliban. Think Ghengis Khan.

Darth Sidious, Welmer 72 Comments [12/7/2012 6:26:36 AM]
Fundie Index: 67

Username  (Login)
Comment  (Text formatting help) 

1 2 3 | bottom

Doubting Thomas

Somehow, it doesn't surprise me that you want to live in the stone age.

12/7/2012 6:31:59 AM


That's the Matriyeh (sp?) society from Jack L. Chalker's "Warriors of the Storm".

It was fiction. Not a model.

12/7/2012 6:33:05 AM

Leighton Buzzard

Obvious troll lives under a bridge. Kinda damp down there, no?

12/7/2012 6:34:03 AM


The "independent thinking" line convinces me that this guy is trolling. The rest... I've seen people mean it seriously, but they also think only support for their idea can be independent thinking and any opposition is "sheeple".

12/7/2012 6:50:13 AM

Mister Spak

"Our mission: destroy and suppress all technological invention in the new world order."

Does that include the internet you posted your drivel on?

12/7/2012 6:52:59 AM


How about you start off that technological suppression by getting off you computer? You will save us all a headache.

12/7/2012 6:53:05 AM

D Laurier

Wow... so you want a bunch of rich nobles to run around killing everyone that makes their power possible, and destroying everything that alows them to function.
How do you think warlords are able to be warlords?
The answer is simple... by maintaining a functioning civilization from which to draw resources and manpower.
As soon as warlords destroy their own powerbase they become something else... They become bandits.
What does the taliban, or the next taliban, or the other taliban, or indeed any taliban, have to do with your bizzare idea? Most (all) talibans are striving to preserve the very things you want to destroy (agriculture, trade, education, social heirarchy, etc)
The great khan Chenghi (aka Ghengis) was a rich man who incorporated conquered peoples into his empire, He embraced civilization, and relied upon schollars and burocrats to run his vast estates.

And you think feminism would support you despite your desire to achieve exactly the opposite of their goals...

12/7/2012 6:54:41 AM


....says the pimple-faced dork in his parent's basement.

12/7/2012 6:57:26 AM


Here's a hint to all you people idealize anarchy and barbarism so much: there are people much bigger and stronger than you could ever hope to be and you will only be destroyed by other more powerful warlords. I can only assume that people like this (if this isn't just trolling) are under the delusion that they're the baddest motherfuckers on the planet and that everyone will worship them. That delusion would be very quickly snapped (along with possibly their neck) if the world they idealize actually existed.

12/7/2012 7:07:47 AM


Poe. Obviously.

12/7/2012 7:20:05 AM


And if this fantasy world came true, you'd be sitting at the bottom of a ditch, a wasted life of a gung-ho idiot.

12/7/2012 7:35:12 AM


Please be a parodist...

12/7/2012 7:54:04 AM


I'm guessing parody. But a pretty decent one.

12/7/2012 8:47:11 AM

rubber chicken

And while you are running around the forest with your sharpened sticks, smearing yourselves in your own excrement, we will have invented Anti-Warlord spray. then you'll be fucked.

12/7/2012 9:15:15 AM


@dionysus: i take offense to that. i recognize myself as anarchist. ok, anarcho-humanist, meaning that fuck rules except the golden one, and nothing is more important than a human's life (promoting cooperation and help between the people, not pro-"life"). i'm a pacifist as well, because i sincerely believe that there exists no situation that can't be solved by having the two antagonists talking or going their own ways. this guy is a troll, hell look at the pseudonym.

all i'm saying is i won't be associated with THAT

12/7/2012 9:42:08 AM



The problem with anarchy is that it isn't scalable. We didn't evolve to have instincts that work to address the problems faced by groups of hundreds of millions or more humans rather than those faced by hundreds or less. We need social structures to prevent something like the quote from actually happening.

12/7/2012 11:35:42 AM

Churchy LaFemme

There's nothing stopping you and your buddies from going off to live a stone-age existence. Plenty of people enjoy wilderness camping for a week or two. Just remember to leave behind your clothes, steel weapons, and all your L.L.Bean survival gear. We'll see how long it takes for you to come crawling back to civilization.

12/7/2012 11:47:21 AM


Pure masturbatory Frank Frazetta Conan the Barbarian Mad Max speed metal lyrics from 1982 fantasising. In real life this specimen would perish very quickly.
Edit: A couple of people here are misunderstanding political use of the word "anarchy". It has two meanings. 1, (as used by most people) chaos. 2, (as used by anarchists) lack of rule or hierarchy. This is closer to the Greek root "an" (no) "archos" (rule). The anarchists, in fact, want more organisation, not less.

12/7/2012 1:04:18 PM


we would, we'd have, we'll, we, we, we ...

Why do the people who have these wierd fantasies always assume they would be the winners in the society they propose? They're losers now, they'd probably be losers then too.

12/7/2012 2:01:49 PM


Obvious troll is obvious.

12/7/2012 2:04:43 PM

The Crimson Ghost

Darth Sidious is pretty cool but I was always a Darth Vader girl. He just had so much more panache.

As far this nonsense goes, it's plain stupid even if he was serious.

12/7/2012 2:12:51 PM

New Face of Rev

If you do form a band of marauders roaming the desert, you will be Lord Humongous' bitch. Just saying.

12/7/2012 2:17:07 PM


I'd be more then happy to challenge your army with mine. I rule my kingdom with a firm but fair rule.

Science and artistics are not only allowed, they are encouraged. While you fight with sticks and rocks, we'll retaliate with armor and iron/steel weapons. And when my army decimates your band, I will accomidate your survivors and allow them into my kingdom.

12/7/2012 3:00:55 PM


Because that worked so well in Cambodia.

12/7/2012 3:51:20 PM



You aren't being consistent with your terminology when you redefine anarchy to include any form of organization. An organization has rules, even in the absence of a hierarchy between the members. It is not a lack of government that you are describing, but simply a different form. Hence, it is not anarchy.

12/7/2012 4:06:24 PM

1 2 3 | top: comments page