These things happen. They are real. Denying them does not make them go away, and the skeptcism of modern society has no power to dismiss them;it simply amuses them.Viruses are naked to the invisable eye, but we know they exist because he devloped the equipment that enabled us to see them. We may not be able to but a demon under a microscope, but God gave us the means to see them.
66 comments
1.Demons speak in mulitaple voices and in muplitaple languages unknown to the person that they possess
Multaple, really?
This expirment has been repeated countless times and it has been proved beyond a doubt that,evil sentient beings called demons do exist
What experiment? You list off a bunch of things you think demons are capable off, but you do not lay out any scientific dubble-blind experiment that tests for these things.
Of course. There had to be a section about Witchcraft, Wicca and Druidry. Anything that is not christian in origin is automatically evil. Never mind that more than half of christianity came from European Paganism.
That fucking bus is never late.
Yes, who put this in? The original is spelled correctly, I was about to say "Too bad it hasn't been proved beyond a doubt that Walter knows spelling and grammar", but he, or the spellchecker behind the book, does know.
The content of the book is still ridiculous, though...
"Demons speak in mulitaple voices and in muplitaple languages unknown to the person that they possess"
From the weird spelling, I take it that Walter Martin is a demon.
So if I get possessed, I'll become multilingual, have superhuman strength, and gain private information about other people / things? Doesn't sound too bad to me...
"we know they exist because he devloped the equipment that enabled us to see them. We may not be able to but a demon under a microscope, but God gave us the means to see them.
...yet, Wally here isn't hammering the doors of James Randi's JREF off their hinges to prove his claims - with said 'equipment' - under strict independent laboratory conditions, is he?
These things don't happen. In more ways than one.
> Demons speak in mulitaple [sic] voices and in muplitaple [sic] languages unknown to the person that they possess
> Demons exbit [sic] superhuman strength
> Demons hav [sic] access to private infromation [sic] that a possessed person could never know
> Demons respond to and obey the authoirty [sic] and the name of Jesus Christ
Since people are so fond of saying "lying for jeebus", I'll say, lying for..idk, Dawkins? He's agressive enough to approve.
Okay, the typos in this are the fault of the submitter, not the book itself.
Proofreading, is it so hard?
> We may not be able to but a demon under a microscope, but God gave us the means to see them.
Nope, religion gave us means to guess they sorta exist. Doesn't take much effort to see that it doesn't stack up to scrutiny.
> This expirment has been repeated countless times
When scientists repeat experiments other people did, use the same methodology that those people claimed to use, and the experiment is only valid if the results turn out to be reasonably similar. If there's a discrepancy between the results, that should raise further questions, like "why did this happen?"
5. Demons wear magic armor that gives +25 health.
Mr Martin. Untill you show evidence to back your claims, your demons are no more real than the orcs who sell magic swords in Orgrimmar... or the council of wizards and elves that keeps Sauron trapped in Mordor.
Skeptcism has no power to dismiss anything. It's the conclusions drawn from a skeptical approach which allows us to dismiss nonsense such as demons.
1. So what? Even if demons were real, speaking in languages "unknown to the person they possess" would seem to be ineffective.
2. They have never exhibited super-human strength to any credible person I know of.
3. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Prove it.
4. So, Jesus Christ is the leader of the demons?
5. You can see demons, but you have to be wearing Ecto-Goggles.
spell check is your friend.
"Viruses are naked to the invisible eye..."
they may be but you might mean "viruses are invisible to the naked eye"
I tend not to pick on spelling or grammer but this is too much.
Demons are shown almost every episode of Supernatural, they must exist.
Did I say, "Demons?"
Silly me. I meant, "Germans!"
You know, the ones that do those puppet shows and speak in funny voices! Of course, the superhuman strength might just be bragging....
"1.Demons speak in mulitaple voices and in muplitaple languages unknown to the person that they possess"
Mulitaple voices and muplitaple languages are certainly unknown to me, but I still don't believe in demons.
Edit: Ok, I see these were the submitter's typos, not the author's.
Every single statement in that post is a complete lie.
What is it with fundies ignoring the parts of the bible that explicitly forbid lying? It was one of the Commandments, ffs.
demons do exist
Yes! Definitely!
There's this demon that visits me every Christmas time and tells me to eat cookies.
There's this other one that tells me to sleep longer on weekends.
There's this other one that tells me to sneak unobtrusive glances at good looking young women.
That's about it.
"Viruses are naked to the invisable eye"
heh. I wish PEOPLE were naked to the invisible eye. All I need is an invisible eye...
Edit: Okay, the submitter has some issues I guess? Anyway, my joke is now directed at them, not at the author.
'Rouge angles of Satin' award?
Edit: whoops, apparently the original is actually spelled correctly. Somebody here is being a naughty troll...
Viruses are naked to the invisable eye
Magic voyeurism?
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
