Communists believe in equality. But equality exists nowhere in nature. In nature there must always be a hierarchy. There must always be the superior and the inferior. Equality is not natural. But you do not wish to accept reality.
Communists are therefore delusional and spend their lives in pursuit of an impossible and unattainable pipe-dream. Leftists of all stripes need to get real and pull their heads out of the clouds and out of their rear ends.
The pursuit of equality is the pursuit of mediocrity. I'm more concerned with the pursuit of excellence. What's so damned great about equality? Some people (and some races) are just better than others. We are not equal. Equality exists nowhere in nature. Accept it. Deal with it. Leftism is for jealous inferiors.
And just FYI, I have read practically all of your silly leftist literature, and don't think very highly of it. Though I would like to point out that one could also be both an economic leftist and a racialist...although I wouldn't personally recommend that.
22 comments
"But equality exists nowhere in nature."
Computers don't exist anywhere in nature either, and you aren't complaining about that... What's wrong with striving for improvement?
"I have read practically all of your silly leftist literature"
Somehow I doubt that. There is more Marxist literature, never mind lefist literature, than you could read in a lifetime.
But tell us about what you thought of Grundrisse or For My Pioneer Comrades...
Haha, I love these retards who go on about 'the fittest should dominate'. Wake up and smell the coffee loserboy - the fittest ARE slowly but surely dominating society, and those fittest are generally liberal, inclusive, principled and fairminded. Gee wizz buddy, looks like you and your disgusting kind are not the dominant form of human after all.
Is there a racist Dalek in here...?
Anyway, equality of opportunity is all that American liberals care about, not about cutting everyone down to size. The concept that hard work should be rewarded equally is apparently tantamount to communism in your eyes.
It's amazing how people still manage to conflate the concepts of equal rights and opportunities with the very different concepts of equal attainment or equal attributes.
I would agree that Marxist Communism is the pursuit of an unattainable dream though: a bit like Christianity, it only works if nobody is an asshole. Note, however, that not everybody to the Left of you is a Marxist Communist, and if you've read 'practically all leftist literature' I'm an albino. You plowed your way through all of Das Kapital? I think not.
"Communists believe in equality. But equality exists nowhere in nature. In nature there must always be a hierarchy. There must always be the superior and the inferior. Equality is not natural. But you do not wish to accept reality.
I have read practically all of your silly leftist literature, and don't think very highly of it."
I don't believe you, or at least I won't believe you that you understood what you read. Communists generally don't bother about equality, but argue that the rich are robbing the poor of the value of their labor. A greater theory that I only ever encountered in more modern times is the idea that all work is worth equal to society, but that isn't a particularly communist idea.
"Communists are therefore delusional and spend their lives in pursuit of an impossible and unattainable pipe-dream."
I agree, a dictatorship can never produce a healthy society.
"Leftists of all stripes need to get real and pull their heads out of the clouds and out of their rear ends."
You mean the clouds of numbers that proof us right?
Oh, also you are understanding the masses wrong when you think equality means outcome equality, they are generally talking about equality of chances and rights.
No offense, but I have the distinct feeling that in any sort of darwinian hierarchy, you'd be fairly close to the bottom.
Also, I'm not sure you fully understand Communism, or that you've read "all of [our] silly leftist literature".
Equality is about how we value humans and are willing to treat them. It's not a fact of life but a social convention. The opposite is also a choice, and an equally subjective one.
How do we determine the value of a human life? Supply and demand? Some scale of skills? What is worth more between a great painter and a great singer? There aren't any objective scale for what people are worth.
But with centuries of trial and error, society figured out that the closer it got to treating everyone as fully deserving of life and dignity and everything, the more prosperous and happy it got.
Speaking as a libertarian socialist (not really a communist but whatever), I can safely say that you believe in your ideology because you want to keep the current system that encourages greed, hate, and harming others. (After all, why else are you posting on stormfront?)
And I sincerely doubt you have read ALL leftist literature. I doubt I've even read 1%, and you've probably read less than half that.
Why do people respond to these as if OP is aware this site even exists? It's not like there isn't a link to go to the source material, so you can interact with them there.
It's a comments section, not a message board thread.
Theres that thing called a beehive you bitchfucker.
contary to popular belief/BS,the bee queen holds no reign over the workers shes just a mindless egg-laying machine.
Here you go. I've disproven your argument with a SINGLE FUCKING EXAMPLE.
Also, you're a supremacist and arrogant as fuck.
Have fun.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.