1
#12449
Wow
Sorry, there are no tie-breakers in science.
1/29/2006 5:11:36 PM
#12450
Cov
\"Without that ability to \"look around outside,\" physics cannot resolve the debate.\"
What the fuck does he think NASA does?
1/29/2006 5:20:21 PM
#12463
Jeremy
\"despite the total and complete inability of experiments to establish its truth or falsity; some will still scoff at geocentricity.\"
Uhhhhh...
1/29/2006 6:37:14 PM
#12464
Crosis
\"All the equations\"? The ones that tell us that no known forces could result in the orbits of the planets that would be consistent with our observations? The ones that require epicycle orbits for geocentricity, as opposed to simple elliptic orbits for heliocentricity? Those equations?
1/29/2006 6:40:00 PM
#12466
Ens
Produce fake moon landing movies, of course. They are an unmentioned subsidiary of the Disney corporation, or don't you know?
1/29/2006 6:44:46 PM
#12484
Luffy
>>despite the published testimonies of top scientists to the viability of geocentricity as a model of the universe<<
Dr. Kent Hovind is not a top scientist. He's not even top of his class at the Special Needs Adult Learning Center.
1/29/2006 8:07:25 PM
#12488
Jeremy PC
This cannot be for real, can it?
1/29/2006 8:24:05 PM
#12564
Bob_Zimmerman
You can't fool me with more of that there science-babble, Crosis! God can make the equations balance!
It still fascinates me that all of these people still want to prove God through some sort of pseudoscience. Isn't that the opposite of what is supposed to happen? I mean, knowledge and evidence preclude faith, so ... aren't they trying to work themselves out of faith and into knowledge? Isn't that exactly what they accuse these \"evos\" and so forth of doing?
1/30/2006 7:46:29 AM
#12578
David D.G.
It can hardly be possible to be more determinedly stupid than this.
~David D.G.
1/30/2006 3:56:24 PM
#12609
TDR
has this guy been frozen in a glacier for the last five hundred years or so?
1/30/2006 8:24:49 PM
#12625
King Spirula
I think his \"top\" scientist must be a gay kinda thing because it sure can't be \"highly regarded\".
1/30/2006 10:31:06 PM
#12685
Julian
It got one thing right!
\"It is the testimony of God as found in the Bible which constitutes the foundation of modern geocentricity\"
Just as well God doesn't exist - he'd be kept down in Junior School and given crayons to play with.
1/31/2006 9:28:51 AM
#12754
NonHomogenized
Actually, we can disprove geocentricity quite easily.
All we have to do is go someplace that isn't Earth, look out into the universe in all directions, and observe that everything in the universe is accelerating away from us at the same rate...
1/31/2006 5:48:22 PM
#126769
ScienceIsGreen
Pre Copernicus Award!
12/23/2006 3:56:59 PM
#126785
Irratio
@NonHomogenized:
We can create a model of physics that is geocentric, that's not the problem. It doesn't really make the calculations easier, though.
But basically, physics works, no matter from where you look at it, and which point in the universe you choose as your origin.
However, there is no viability in saying \"Geocentricity is the correct model\", which is what our Narrow-pathed Pilgrim seems to mean.
12/23/2006 5:09:51 PM
#1319928
v200
I could say we went to space and saw the earth going around the sun, but he probably believes that it was all a hoax.
8/8/2011 3:56:00 PM
#1319930
Dr. Shrinker
If this clown is legit, we should put him/her on a preserve. There aren't many geocentrists left in the world, and the number gets smaller with every generation. It would be sad if they went extinct.
I'm just yankin' you. It wouldn't be sad at all.
8/8/2011 4:07:04 PM
1