whenever we kill a life we could possibly killing one more witness for christ.
cRoUcHinG tIgEr HiDdEN VaLleY GiRl,
[2/6/2006 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
You could be killing an atheist too. Tempting, no?
2/6/2006 7:22:44 AM
Or even a homersexural.
2/6/2006 7:42:37 AM
(oh god, I shouldn't say it, but someone HAS to :P )
Wow, that's the strongest pro-abortion case I've ever heard!
2/6/2006 12:09:53 PM
My God they're right! What if we're killing a Christian abortion doctor?
2/6/2006 2:29:59 PM
Or you could be killing a future atheist who now doesn't have the chance to reject Jesus and get sent to hell for it.
2/6/2006 3:25:49 PM
Nice username by the way :P.
2/6/2006 5:01:58 PM
Seems like a perfectly fine statement to me... afterall, she did include the word \"possibly.\"
Or maybe I missed something?
2/6/2006 5:13:44 PM
Teenager, it implies that she wouldn't mind abortion if we could determine future religious beliefs in utero.
2/6/2006 5:49:36 PM
I'm not sure whether this gets creativity points or not; I'd rather they just stick to the \"you might be killing the person who discovers the cure for cancer\" argument.
2/6/2006 5:57:04 PM
So... the argument is that most of that much-vaunted \"value of life\" is in potential witnessing?
And you call US uncompassionate bastards. Sad.
2/6/2006 6:28:09 PM
How many witnesses does that guy need? Most trials really only need one honest witness and some facts to back them up.
2/6/2006 7:52:32 PM
Facts! We don't need no stinkin' facts.
2/6/2006 9:22:32 PM
Especially if they're a late term abortion for medical reasons...
2/7/2006 1:44:26 AM
What is up with the alternate capitalization? I get the image of the poster bouncing on a pogo stick as she's typing.
2/8/2006 6:11:13 PM