The title for this is wrong ... should read "Terri Shiavo's MURDERER Remarries." Not that it matters -- him [Michael] and her [Jodi] were live in lovers, shacking up, parenting children out of wedlock WHILE he was still legally married to Terri ... what's the big deal about a scrap of paper NOW?
One thing, that new wife better be watching her back , he doesn't have as good a track record with wives as he does with girlfriends.
14 comments
the name HomeschoolersRUs says it all. If this person would try going to a real school and not fake home school, then she might be better informed on the issue. BTW it was me, operating under the FC name MN_homebrewer
Actually, I share this poster's abhorrence of the husband's romantic activities while the wife was on life support. However, calling him a murderer is clearly wrong. Call him an adulterer, call him a cad -- but not a murderer.
~David D.G.
<<Why doesn't the whole Terri Schiavo controversy just die already? (Pardon the pun. Really, I'm sorry.)>>
Jade, don't feel bad! I put my foot in my mouth in another comment line, also about something from Freak Conservatives. These people are such fools that they make fools out of us. Maybe it is actually a good thing that I was banned from FC this morning!
Michael Schiavo is extremely selfish, especially since he went to school, got a degree in nursing, just to be able to help Terry recover.
He has a better track record with wives than Cheney has with guns or W with bikes. Anyway, he stayed married in order to ensure her wishes were carried out, as to divorce her would have transfered those responsiblities to the state or, more likely, her family. If Michael just wanted out, all he would have to do is divorce her, then she becomes someone else's problem.
From the reports I read, Terri's family encouraged Michael to get out & see other people. This was many years after her initial collapse.
Perhaps the family was trying to get Michael to bow out, so they could take over & go against Terri's wishes.
A man was visiting his wife in hospital where she has been in a coma for several years. On this visit he decides to rub her left breast instead of just talking to her. On doing this she lets out a sigh.
The man runs out and tells the doctor who says this is a good sign and suggests he should try rubbing her right breast to see if there is any reaction. The man goes in and rubs her right breast and this brings a moan.
From this, the doctor suggests that the man should go in and try oral sex as a stimulation to bring her out of her coma, saying he will wait outside as it is a personal act and he doesn't want the man to be embarrassed.
The man goes in then comes out about five minutes later, white as a sheet and tells the doctor his wife is dead.
Shocked, the doctor asks "What the hell happened man?"
"She choked."
All right Julian! Bad taste is good! :D
Anyway, here's a response I posted to address the arguments that conservatives have re: the Schiavo case:
http://www.iidb.org/vbb/showthread.php?t=138932
"I can't believe all this misinformation that is still being passed off as 'news' after the autopsy results have been released.
Firstly, the 'responsiveness' that Terri showed was random and could not be consistently replicated through cues such as the Mickey Mouse balloon.
Secondly, she was in a persistent vegetative state, which you neglected to mention. Conservatives have used semantics and emotional appeals by stating that Terri was not a cabbage. Obviously, she wasn't - vegetable has a different meaning when it is used to describe brain damaged or brain dead patients.
Finally, the feeding tube was life support in Terri's case. She could breathe on her own, but not swallow, and so the feeding tube had to be inserted surgically. It was nothing like feeding a baby."
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.