That evidence comes from scientest who are Trying to prove that evolution is true. Carbon dating is totally off, they're trying to date dino's that died in the flood, and prove that they're from a million years ago. Even though we all know that the earth is really about 5,000 years old.
15 comments
1) Carbon dating is never used for anything that we think is from more than 50,000 years ago - the half-life is too short. But that shouldn't be a problem if the Earth is only 5000 years old, as it's very accurate to that age.
"Even though we all know that the earth is really about 5,000 years old."
Ditto to what Crosis stated about radiocarbon dating. Also, since it is used frequently for anthropological digs, it has consistently determined that western civilization began at least 13,000 years ago...you know, before the earth was created according to Queen of the Dumbed.
Never mind that we have sumerian ideograms older than that, that egyptians were making papyrus around 3000 BCE, the abacus was invented around then, and, within 300 years, the first calendar was invented...
So many wrongs in such a short quote.
ScientIst, and it's probably plural as well.
The only thing that is correct is that carbon dating is totally off if you're trying to date dinosaurs.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
