There are 3 billion base pairs in the human genome. A simple rearrangement of the location of ONE base pair changes the entire final product. It could be a change like whether or not it has brown eyes or blue eyes, or straight hair or kinky hair (though this is not to suggest that such a simple change would make the difference between being a black or a man, as the DNA of blacks is closer to apes than it is to men).
19 comments
*Warning to Fundies reading this post: I'll be using a big scientific sounding word in my reply. You may want to avert your eyes so as not to have to look something up.*
"as the DNA of blacks is closer to apes than it is to men"
Isn't this the same sort of thinking that lead to phrenology? They thought criminals looked less evolved so therefore they acted more brutish and jacobisrael here thinks DNA from someone who happens to be black is closer to an ape than to himself.
I'm sure I was trying to make a point with that somehow. Eh, probably not. It's late, I'm tired. Give me a break.
Actually, there is less variation in DNA between blacks and whites than you might think. The differences between typical "white" and "black" genes are actually less than those observed within either race, which is why most geneticists don't even consider there to be separate races within the human population.
Not to mention that altering a single base pair will, in all likelyhood, make absolutely no difference at all. Which is a very convenient thing, otherwise we'd all be dying of cancer even before growing that extra head.
Hey, CousinTed da' engineer! I'll get on the racist train if you let me ride in the cab! If you have a push/pull train, can I ride in the engine for the return trip?
NOTE: If you read this post and see anything more than a stupid joke based on Ted's figure of speech and my enthusiasm for my hobby, then you should have your eyes checked. If you take this to mean that I am racist, I reserve the right to say: "Oy! What's with everyone?!"
And if you can tell me whether or not there are any R68 singles left, except for the ones used on the Frankie, then I will say "thank you," but unless you live where I do and share my hobby, you probably won't even know what I'm talking about.
Sorry for hijacking your thread. I'll delete this post if you want me to. I need some more sleep.
It's uncanny how these people can so blithely pronounce 19th-century beliefs and make it sound as if they are backed up by 21st-century science, when 21st-century science actually refutes every word of what they claim.
Whether its creationism or racism, science actually breaks down their arguments completely; but they are so utterly wedded to them that they turn science on its head and then invoke it as "proof" of their nonsensical beliefs.
If anyone reading this is in psychology and looking for a good topic for a research project, I'd bet that there's some great potential for an abnormal psych paper in this phenomenon somewhere.
~David D.G.
TDR,
I was about to suggest just about any of the ubiquitous articles referring to the fact that humans share 98% (or whatever) of their DNA with chimpanzees, noting that none of these articles differentiate between the various varieties of humans in the process.
Then I rechecked the above post and saw that the poster clearly refers to "blacks" as a distinctly separate category from "men" -- so any article referring to men or humans, to him, obviously can only mean white people (or at least nonblack people), so that would force you to do one of two things:
(1) Make the additional point that different species cannot viably interbreed, so "blacks" are not a different species from "men," so this exclusion of "blacks" from the human category is completely bogus.
(2) Find an anti-racism article that SPECIFICALLY addresses this very point, that the different "races" are all part of one species, and no group's DNA is any closer to or farther from chimpanzee DNA than any other group's.
Sorry I don't have a specific article for you, but I would recommend checking the skeptics' webring for starters, or just googling with appropriate keywords. Good luck; your search is bound to pull up a lot of secondary sources quoting the primary ones with minimal attribution, complicating the hunt.
~David D.G.
Let's see...humans have around 20-25 thousand genes, only four to seven genes vary with melanin level, and around thirty to forty other genes due to genetic diversity. That means the variation between any two humans is less than 0.01%. Now, Ape is a very odd term to use because; 1, Ape is a Superfamily, comprising of thousands of species; and 2, we are apes due to our physiology. So you are as related to apes as a black person.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.