[From a news report]
A storm has erupted over comments by Australia's top Muslim cleric, who told worshippers women who don't cover up their bodies are responsible for sexual attacks they endure.
The Australian newspaper reported that Sheik Taj Aldin Hilaly has outraged female Muslim leaders with comments he made during a Ramadan sermon to 500 worshippers in Sydney last month.
In the sermon on the topic of adultery, he compared the plight of women who suffered sexual attacks to uncovered meat.
"If you take out uncovered meat and place it outside on the street, or in the garden or in the park, or in the backyard without a cover, and the cats come and eat it ... whose fault is it, the cats or the uncovered meat?," he reportedly said.
"If she was in her room, in her home, in her hijab, no problem would have occurred."
The Sheikh also said women were "weapons" used by "Satan" to control men.
59 comments
So it's her fault because, according to the sheik, men are stray animals who need to fuck to survive?
Yeah, if that bitch would've been making me fucking sammich she wouldn't get raped. As if rape is just expected.
"Bring your umbrella, you don't want to get soaked."
"Bring your birth control and a first aid kit, you don't want to get raped."
Hey sheikh-head, if you think women are weapons of satan, then give them to a country who will appreciate them, and you and your 'gang' can go back to fucking camels then. Fucking fuck.
*sigh*
Look, I wanna echo Sark's comment and just say how utterly, utterly repulsed I am by this man. Please don't think that he in any way represents us. Here in Australia, our calendars show that the year is 2006, NOT 1806 like the blind Sheik's. We are very civilised, normally, and when men rape women we usually consider the man responsible.
Carry on.
I'd like to point out to a rant I made a few months ago (just look for it, I'm too lazy to do so) in which I argued that exposing people to "immodest" clothing reduces the number of sexual crimes. People get used to it and are therefore less likely to be overcome by uncontrollable urges.
Please do carry on without your bigotry.
Sark,
I'm an Aussie, I read this on the front page of today's "Australian" paper and I don't want to apologise for people like this. I just want to get up, say this is why everyone on the planet should ditch religion of all kinds and get everybody to wake up and just shun Hilaly for the rest of forever. C'mon man, we're not responsible for this wacko. That's like saying every American's responsible for Bush.
"The Australian newspaper reported that Sheik Taj Aldin Hilaly has outraged female Muslim leaders with comments he made during a Ramadan sermon to 500 worshippers in Sydney last month."
"If she was in her room, in her home, in her hijab, no problem would have occurred."
If Hilaly was in the islamic paradise he left instead of Australia no problem would have occurred.
Troff said:C'mon man, we're not responsible for this wacko. That's like saying every American's responsible for Bush.
That's true, but I know just where you are coming from. It's hard to hold my head high somedays when fuckhead phelps or carico embarrasses me or my country (and don't get me started on the piece of corn-riddled shit in the white house). I sometimes feel the need to apologize and distance myself from the madness. The first thing I thought of was 'here's another radical religious fucknut', that's all. He's not your fault unless you trained him. ;0)
The Sheikh also said women were "weapons" used by "Satan" to control men.
Even if this were true instead of ridiculous, how would that excuse the men? Is he saying it's OK for men to do anything they want as long as they were tempted to it by Satan? A strange position for a religious leader to take ...
Yep. The fundie "blame the victim" project marches on. I am a resident of Australia and I am ashamed to the core that this country has people like this getting time on national television spewing this kind of garbage. It is things like this that deepen the divide between the cultures and will one day spark a war. I don't like to say that I hate anyone, but I do hate people like this; people who villify women in the name of their religion.
This was further amplified by news from my native Poland from which I have gathered that the government there is trying to completely ban abortion. Of course, almost all the decision-making seems to be done by men in connection with the catholic church.
Well done, you retards! I really hate organised religion.
So, does this kind of reasoning allow a robber to claim that it's not his fault because the money tempted him too much for him to resist? Maybe the robber could even sue the person he robbed for causing him to act immorally!
Seriously, this is about as boneheaded an attitude as it is possible to have with regard to personal-responsibility issues. Blaming the victim solves nothing and just turns reality on its head.
~David D.G.
D.G., that's an idea, but it could be made more violent.
1) Beat Sheik Taj Aldin Hilaly, because his words bring you to anger.
2) Blame him for bringing about your anger.
3) Beat him again as punishment for doing this.
Ah, I see. The Sheikh is saying that men are either completely weak willed and slaves to their desires or they are pathetically evil.
Either that, or Satan is more powerful than Allah, since the all powerful "woman weapon" can just make them throw away any sense of righteousness or devotion to Allah in order to get their rocks off.
Pehaps it is "righteous" men who should be bundled up, escorted at all times, and locked away. They seem much more dangerous.
Perhaps it is the fault of those who let the cats roam with no controls on their behavior.
Curious, I had no idea some of my best friends were weapons. I had always thought of my friends as high caliber, but not in exactly that way.
Repugnant sentiments aside, is this really front-page worthy? If some (to take an example at random) judge said, and I quote, it's impossible for a woman to be raped if she's wearing jeans (in defense of rapists who attack women in short skirts), she knew what she was wearing when she left the house.... that would maybe rate page six.
Methinks the Australian is trying to stir up extra anti-Muslim sentiment. Not that it's undeserved, but I'm just pointing out that perhaps violent misogyny is not something that Muslims or even religious people have a monopoly on.
I am tempted to kill raging fundies. Fundies should stay in their rooms in their homes. If they did, I wouldn't be tempted to kill any of them. If I should happen to kill a fundy, it's clearly not my fault.
Mysogyny, men having no self control, all of that bullsh*t is really about controlling women and making them into baby factories.
Men like Hilaly make me sick. That he's a top cleric makes me even sicker. I have no reason to be responsible for anyone's actions but my own.
"A man who cannot restrain his desires is not a man"
Umar (the 4th caliph)
Sadly ALL fundies think they are victims of so-called temptation by women, Its because male fundies are not men, they cannot become men untill they grow up, and they refuse to do so.
1000 years ago it was said that a naked girl could carry a bag of gold through the streets of any islamic city without fear.
But today imams are spewing this garbage.
""If you take out uncovered meat and place it outside on the street, or in the garden or in the park, or in the backyard without a cover, and the cats come and eat it ... whose fault is it, the cats or the uncovered meat?," he reportedly said."
Since cats are driven by instict and meat is dead protien, you're an imbecile.
Alright, using this joker's own analogy let's consider the moral implications. Let's say someone leaves out a piece of meat on a porch. Now, another person walks by and steals the meat. Who is the thief again?
Oh sure, we could tell the person that was robbed that he/she could have taken precautions against theft. Similarly women can take precautions against rape which include traveling in a group where possible, avoiding dark allies, etc. But the point is the thief is still a thief, i.e. the rapist is still a rapist!
Besides being a morally horrid analogy, it doesn't even work the way he means it to work:
"If you take out uncovered meat and place it outside on the street, or in the garden or in the park, or in the backyard without a cover, and the cats come and eat it ... whose fault is it, the cats or the uncovered meat?"
Er, surely it's the cat's fault? The meat didn't do anything except sit about innocently, did it?
If she was in her room, in her home, in her hijab, no problem would have occurred.
If the guy was locked away, no problem would have occurred either. That's why we lock up rapists.
I don't get it. If men are so incapable of self restraint then why is this man advocating that women remain at home, unseen? Surely we should be the ones in charge, exerting authority over the poor creatures whose thinking is comparable to that of cats.
If meat=women and cats=men, who is the dude that put the meat close to the cat, without realizing that the cat would eat the meat, god?, an idiot?, Sheik Taj Aldin Hilaly?
I will email this to that idiot convert who told me that Islam gives more freedom to women than any other religion. Well, yes, this guy is a dullard and doesn´t represent islam, but I don´t see many enthusiastic moderate moslems linching him verbally.
So, many rapes should have happened in more than 80% of the world, according to this idiot. Besides, are women like meat?, I say, at least he´s honest, even if mysoginist.
"If she was in her room, in her home, in her hijab, no problem would have occurred."
Guess what, if the rapist was in his house it wouldn't have happened either. therefore, every human being uncapable of controlling his or her impulse should stay at home, or maybe in jail.
Honestly, as a woman the thing that offends me most about this is being referred to as an object that can control men. A piece of dead f**king animal, no less.
Dude, if I really wanted to control a man, all I would have to do was decide to do it. I'm not a mindless piece of meat used by Satan, I'm a person with a mind and conscience that I can ignore to attemt control of a man if I want!
A more recent quote from this guy:
"Anglo-Saxons arrived in Australia as convicts. Muslims paid for their own tickets, and so have more right to Australia"
This from someone who outstayed his visa in Australia, was originally going to be deported, and somehow a new Immigration minister granted him permanent residency, despite not meeting the criteria. He's spent the rest of the time denigrating Australia and Australians. Boggles the mind.
So you're telling me that no woman has been raped at home? You're telling me that no woman has been raped while wearing a hijab?
And I don't know about you, but judging from world history, it seems like men were weapons used by Satan to control women.
Get off our planet.
I think that the USA should do the muslim world a huge favor. Since women are leading their men to sin and vice, why not just send all their women here to America? We'll have all the hot arab women, they'll have their faith and eveyrone will be happy.
*Stabs Sheik Taj Aldin Hilaly to death and leaves his body to rot in an alley so that the cats can come by and nibble on him.*
Hey, it was his fault for leaving his body so exposed. Besides, if he had kept his vile mouth shut, I wouldn't have been tempted to kill him.
as if we needed to be reminded it's more than just christians
what the hell is it with the abrahamic religions, do they just get drunk on perceived power or what
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.