People with faith are better than Athiests. Imagine our goverment full of Athiests, than means, that could give a shit less about other people's lives knowing after they die, no punishment will come to them because nothing will happen in the after life.
Our goverment, believes in god, they know they better do their best or try to do good and prevent evil because they know in the after life, the stuff they did in life will be held against them with God.
Yeah sure, the middle east has problems with turning their faith upside down. The true meaning of this is poverty, 3rd world countries which leads to voilence. If there wasn't faith in the middle east, terrorist would find somthing else as an excuse for killing vicitims.
I believe god is no longer giving physcial proof on purpose, he is testing our civilization, seeing if we a worthy enough to stick on his side even though the phsyical proof has no longer to be seen in ages. God knows we have advanced in many ways knowing that giving us Phsyical evidence would be too easy for him to get the non believers to jump back on the God Bandwagon.
35 comments
I'm not an Athiest, but I have a sneaking suspicion that a government full of Athiests might actually have better morals than a Theistic government simply because they would be doing the right thing because it is right, not because they're trying to escape punishment or recieve some reward.
But then I have this weird idea that people are basically good and altruistic regardless of religious affiliation (or lack therof) and try to look out for the common good. It's when they've been convinced of some sort of absolutist agenda that trouble starts.
Actually, I'd say that atheists would be distinctly more likely to be morally superior to people with faith, because the people with faith frequently have this notion that whatever they do in this life, and no matter who might suffer for it, they will be forgiven and will get to go to heaven simply because they believe that they believe in God the RIGHT WAY. (How many times have you seen one of those smug bumper stickers -- "Not perfect, just forgiven"?)
So people of faith are the ones who have no incentive to take care of their fellow humans, and every incentive to do whatever gets them their jollies in this life; whereas atheists, since they believe this is the only life they'll get, have every incentive to treat it (and the people with whom they share it) with much greater moral respect.
~David D.G.
David and Tara, I would further add to that what my fundy grandfather in law says:
don't worry about recycling (or conservation, etc, of choice), Jesus is coming soon anyway.
<<< that could give a shit less about other people's lives knowing after they die, no punishment will come to them because nothing will happen in the after life. >>>
We don't need the threat of hell to be good people. I would argue that that makes us morally superior - while you try to do the right thing because you think there's something in it for you, we do it because it's the right thing.
<<< Our goverment, believes in god >>>
To our unending sorrow, yes. If Bush didn't believe he had a direct line to the divine, maybe he wouldn't have been such a fuckup.
<<< If there wasn't faith in the middle east, terrorist would find somthing else as an excuse for killing vicitims. >>>
Possibly ... but maybe not. The ones at the top most likely would, but it's a lot easier to recruit when you promise your "martyrs" 72 virgins in the afterlife.
<<< I believe god is no longer giving physcial proof on purpose, he is testing our civilization, seeing if we a worthy enough to stick on his side even though the phsyical proof has no longer to be seen in ages. >>>
So the test is, are we willing to believe in something with exactly zero evidence?
I saw this argument on a marquee outside of a church this morning. Of course, it had been boiled down to the far more succinct "If there is no God, then basically nothing is unlawful".
I didn't stop to point out that murder is still against the law if there is a law against it and no God, but I might do so if it's still there next time I pass.
Well, many horrors have been committed by governments lead by believers and by those lead by atheists. I see no evidence that belief in God makes one "moral." Our jails are filled with believers.
As for that firepiss problem, modern medicine has a pill for that.
OK insane rant granted. BUT WAAAAAIIIIT!!!!
<<<giving us Phsyical evidence would be too easy for him to get the non believers to jump back on the God Bandwagon>>>
So once upon a time it was OK to perform all these miracle's, yet now it's not? And if there was proof, we wouldn't really believe, but just tag along?
So they'll just tag along for the ride?
Dear firepiss, (I think this name is giving us more information about you than we really want.)
I would just like to point out that we have no evidence that God ever performed any miracles!
Dear Crosis,
I recall reading somewhere that the word "vigin" used when describing the martyr's paradise in the Qur'an was in fact a mistranslation: It should be "pomegranate". Get back to me when you have a mo.
<<< I recall reading somewhere that the word "vigin" used when describing the martyr's paradise in the Qur'an was in fact a mistranslation: It should be "pomegranate". Get back to me when you have a mo. >>>
I've never heard that (though I do believe it's possible). In any case, that ain't what the Jihadist ringleaders are promising, and the basic point stands - it's a lot easier to get people to do your bidding when you promise them an eternal reward.
TDR,
I've heard that from fundies a number of times. James Watt, Reagan's Sec. of the Interior, publicly espoused this religious belief as part of his reasoning for opening up public lands to oil/gas/mining/lumber intrests. It became one of the reasons he was asked to resign. What it demonstrates is that "firepiss" is exactly wrong. Religious people in power will make policy based on their beliefs and at the expense of the public.
"Our goverment, believes in god, they know they better do their best or try to do good and prevent evil because they know in the after life, the stuff they did in life will be held against them with God."
If you actually need a fear of eternal punshiment to deter you from, say, raping your neighbor's twelve year old daughter, then what the fuck is wrong with you???
So believing in fairy tales is better then accepting reality, I guess we should make sure children never learn to stop believing in Santa Claus, the Eater Bunny, and the Tooth Fairy, we should also encourage polytheism, after all, if believing in one imaginary supernatural entity is good, believing in LOTS of them must be even better!
"Yeah sure, the middle east has problems with turning their faith upside down. The true meaning of this is poverty, 3rd world countries which leads to voilence. If there wasn't faith in the middle east, terrorist would find somthing else as an excuse for killing vicitims."
This bit reminded me of a Bill Hicks show, where he says that if the US government gave all the money they spend on weapons to the poor people of the world there would be no more wars. I have to agree with him. Also religious people can make very *bad* leaders, when they start thinking that their gods have a problem with a certain group of people, and they should do something about them.
...
...And I thought I'd heard everything about religion in our government...
Y'know, I have a culmative essay to do for my World History course. My topic is religion in government, and the three societies I've chosen are Egypt, Rome, and Maya. All three societies had religion intimately tied with government. All three societies fell.
I believe god is no longer giving physcial proof on purpose, he is testing our civilization, seeing if we a worthy enough to stick on his side even though the phsyical proof has no longer to be seen in ages. God knows we have advanced in many ways knowing that giving us Phsyical evidence would be too easy for him to get the non believers to jump back on the God Bandwagon.
It couldn’t possibly be that we are seeing no more divine miracles because we now have better technological means to explain phenomena. Or that with the modern media and communication methods there is less “word of mouth” distortion and exaggeration of events.
No, it must mean that god suddenly decided to be shy about it
You do know that the governments in the Middle East believe in the same god as you do, and they also know "they better do their best or try to do good and prevent evil because they know in the after life, the stuff they did in life will be held against them with God".
We atheists follow the Golden Rule and our conscience, and try our best to do good for the sake of others and ourselves here in this life, not to score brownie points with some tyrannical deity.
I think by now it's been proven beyond doubt that everytime a highly religious (especially fundamentalist ) person assumes power everything goes to shit.
This is easily trackable, the last thirty years of America alone show when "good Christians" are in charge, everything, including moral values are lost.
Check the moral values of your "godly" leaders. It's fucking dismal how deviant the best family values people are.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.