www.anarchistnews.org

kilwaii #racist anarchistnews.org

(Regarding an anarchist organisation that gives food to the homeless)

...if white people are going to participate at all in such projects, it needs to be by invitation only, period. White people need to stop inserting themselves in communities they don't belong in, and stop imposing their agendas on people of color. Do-gooder whities, please, get the fuck off my block.

To those who caution against wasting time critiquing food not bombs, white supremacy needs to be called out wherever it is (i.e. EVERYWHERE). I warn you, those who hide their white supremacy behind the mask of the "movement" are particularly dangerous.

To those who gendered me (and other participants in the CrimethInc. Eviction) in their comments, I resist your linguistic violence. I am not a "he." Take your gender binary and shove it. Fuck you.

Finally, someone asked that if I have a problem with white people I should just say so, instead of attacking Food Not Bombs.

Newsflash: I DO have a problem with white people. I will always have a problem with the oppressor. The thing is, how could I then not also have a problem with FNB? FNB is after all a white dominated movement. White people generally, and Food Not Bombs specifically, anger me. My anger is legitimate, and I will not wait for whitey to validate it.

Anonymous #moonbat anarchistnews.org

I have no idea if this is supposed to be a joke or not. I surely hope so, because it's been giving me the best laughing fit I've had in years.

Leo, I'm over the age of thirty, have two kids, work a job, support my family, and live in a great amazing apartment. I also support stealing from bosses, wrecking capitalist property, robbing banks, attacking the pigs, and countless other illegal acts.

Your article is ridiculous, and I'm happy to be the first person to comment on this waste of pixels on my computer screen.

Can we settle this once and for all? Anarchism, by it's definition, is an illegal ideology. There is a law in the United States, known as the sedition act, that makes it illegal to work, agitate, or organize against the existence of the United States government. If you could somehow that anarchists don't want to attack the existence of the U.S. government, even in purely verbal terms and through literature, then, I'm sorry my friend, you're not an anarchist. You're a social-democrat.

Whether or not you think it's a good idea to attack capitalist property or not, or to engage in clandestine acts, to argue that anarchists should break the law or engage in illegal action is to negate anarchism itself as even an ideology.

Revolution isn't legal. It's not safe or pretty or easy to fit into some comfortable box. I'm sorry you have decided that you want to fit into some secure comfortable life now that you're almost thirty, but for most of us in this country, we don't live a comfortable or secure life. We struggle as it is against precarity and a precarious life. That will be our reality for as long as we can work. It's not like I can retire. When I'm no longer able to work, I can either die, or live illegally.

Dearest Leo, your privilege disgusts me. Because really, that's all this post is, just a privileged brat's rant.