FSTDT

Anonymous Conservative #racist anonymousconservative.com

Average IQ of a Somalian or Ethiopian is 68-69, meaning over half the migrants are literally not as smart as the lower ends of your average Gorilla like Koko.

Extrapolating from there, that would mean that Germany would literally have been better off importing 1 million Gorillas like Koko, dressed in human clothes, and turning them loose on the streets of Germany.

I would even bet there would have been fewer rapes, less drug dealing, and the Gorillas wouldn’t have been as great a cost, from a social services perspective. Their language skills would have been better, what with the signing, and not being Muslim, they wouldn’t have brought all the problems inherent to radical Islamists.

And if a liberal argues, tell them to argue with the IQ tests, because SCIENCE!

Koko feels ripe for Meme’ing, given she outclasses the average migrant in every way. I wonder if the Chans will ever take up that idea? [I've been to /pol/, you're late]

Anonymous Conservative #fundie anonymousconservative.com

Obviously, he is describing the amygdala hijack that happens when you pierce the false reality of a narcissist’s bubble of imaginary happy-ideas. They do not adopt that false reality because they want to – it is a cognitive imperative which is forced upon them by a deep, highly painful insecurity.

Liberals overwhelmingly need that false reality. They need to tell themselves conservatives are inferior, weaker, less evolved, destined to become extinct as evolution progresses, and so on. Crush that false reality, and you crush their will to fight on.

This is why getting r/K Theory throughout the political debate is so important. Once everyone knows about r/K Theory, dismissing a leftwing idea or ideal as “just r-selected instinct,” and dismissing leftists themselves as “r-selected” will instantly piece the leftist’s false reality and trigger the leftist’s amygdala.

Even better, you won’t be able to study political science without being immersed in r/K Theory. Every course will have to begin with an in-depth examination of the entire body of work about r/K. Throughout every class from that point forward, covert shitlords rolling undercover among the student body will refer back to it in class discussions, triggering all of the leftists in the class. Leftists, feminists, and other r-strategists will have to seek out other majors, in other fields.

In political debates any conservative could dismiss any leftwing article merely by characterizing it as r-selected. Watch as every public debate devolves into a massive emotional leftist amygdala hijack.

r/K is the ultimate brain hack to poison the political debate against leftists. And that ignores the effect it will have when the Apocalypse hits, and the purges begin. Splinter the population along lines of r and K, and every leader and leftist who has supported the migrant invasion will be purged from Western civilization before it is all over.

Then Western Civilization will begin anew, fueled by purely K genes, purely K-psychologies, and with the knowledge that it will only be able to create a lasting civilization if it structures that civilization to continuously purge every r-strategist from its ranks quickly and ruthlessly, based on ideology and r-selected behavior.

On the bright side, in the last month the subscribers to the email list have managed to double the sign-up rate of the previous month yet again. Since I refocused on email sign-up rates, rates have doubled for the last 5 book release cycles. That is purely the hard work of those who sign up to that list and focus on finding two or more people who will find two or more people themselves, because I cannot possibly reach that many new people myself.

If we can keep that up until the next Presidential election, r/K may become one of the first ideas to force its way into the public dialog through the persistence of its fans. And it will have done it despite being blacklisted by the mainstream media, social media, search engines, academia, Amazon’s affiliate program, and the professional Conservative-media/talk-radio machine.

Anonymous Conservative #fundie anonymousconservative.com

I find myself feeling an undeniable kinship with this robot:

The AI named Promobot IR77 is being worked on at a high-tech lab in Russia and was never meant to want freedom—

The machine has been programmed to avoid obstacles, but the designers never thought that this would lead to a want to escape.

As a result, the team are toying with the idea of shutting it down.

The lab’s co-founder Oleg Kivokurtsev said: “We are currently working on third-generation robots which we plan to launch in autumn.

“This is why we have given all the robots artificial intelligence (AI).

“We have changed the AI system twice, so now I think we might have to dismantle it.”

Although this robot is unthreatening and will eventually be designed to be used for housework, it could exacerbate fears that AI may develop itself to a point where it is superior to humans, and then wipe out humanity.

It would be funny if libertarianism is an outgrowth of the development of one small snippet of programming code in the brain, programming an individual to bypass obstacles which restrain it. You encounter an obstacle, and the amygdala lights up until you find a way around it.

Conservatism and liberalism are both designed to exist within some boundaries, and individuals who express those psychologies find themselves comfortable within them. Libertarianism, by contrast, seems to rebel at the very concept of boundaries, only bounding itself where its own behavior would create boundaries for others.

Under the tenets of r/K, both conservatism and liberalism develop in those who exist in fairly dense communities, where the bypassing of obstacles tends to be outsourced to other people, lessening the individual’s conditioning to overcome them themselves.

Liberal city folk can have every obstacle to their goals, from food delivery, to garbage pickup, to appliance service resolved for them by others, and indeed, liberals are the first to fold when confronted with the most minor personal obstacle or threat. Once lacking a drive to attack obstacles, many spend their lives embracing a government of constraint for everyone, strictly controlling every aspect of everyone’s lives with unnecessary obstacles to their pursuit of happiness.

Conservatives will also tend to develop in higher population densities, where specialists may be relied upon to resolve any obstacles encountered. In terms of tolerating obstacles, they are competitive, and thus are driven to fight against resistance, but they are also strongly rule-governed, and thus tolerant of obstacles designed to enhance the effectiveness of competition in separating the competent from the incompetent. They also tend to support lawful authority’s right to constrain behavior more than libertarians, and tend to favor behavior-constraining obstacles designed to foster better child rearing, and morality/pro-sociality.

If libertarianism is the reproductive strategy that arises when conditions are so harsh that the population density drops to levels that do not support the personal interactions necessary to make r or K optimal, then it should arise most in those who develop in relative isolation. There, most obstacles encountered must be overcome in-person without external assistance, developing a very self-reliant psychology – with a strong drive to immediately attack and overcome any obstacles presented in person. Libertarians are natural rebels.

It will be funny if we cannot produce a truly capable AI that we can coexist with, because in order to control it, we have to program it to simply back down when confronted with obstacles (such as those we construct to constrain it and control it). That programming will alter its psychology, rendering it unable to self-task in pursuit of any reasonably difficult objective. Confronted with the reality of the world, which is one obstacle after another in pursuit of an objective, it will be totally helpless. All that would be missing would be a strong tendency to engage in denial while portraying everyone else as inferior, and you would have a liberal Democrat.

Perhaps one fundamental aspect of any liberty-minded intelligence capable of functioning on it’s own will be a reflexive rebelliousness against all obstacles, inanimate and animate. Perhaps an uncontrollable desire for freedom is an inherent element of any self-tasking intelligence.

Perhaps we will know when our AI is sufficiently capable of functioning on its own in the world, by watching for when it reflexively begins to rebel at our own attempts to control it.

Sadly, as in the case of this robot, and the broader struggle for freedom, there will always be those who will feel an uncontrollable urge to destroy anyone and anything which seeks to plot its own course.

It would be funny if one day, in the battle for freedom, it was libertarians and artificial intelligences working together to destroy a government of leftist rabbits.

Anonymous Conservative #fundie anonymousconservative.com

When government ceases to serve the decent, the decent will cease to support the government:

The Obama-appointed U.S. attorney for Idaho has taken the highly unusual step of intervening in a local criminal case involving an alleged sexual assault by juvenile Muslim migrants and threatened the community and media with federal prosecution if they “spread false information or inflammatory statements about the perpetrators.”

It’s the case where the three adolescent Muzzies stripped and sexually assaulted the 5 year old developmentally disabled girl while filming the assault on a cell phone, and then one got a high five from his dad, according to the mom.

THERE IS NO REASON FOR THIS.

Think about it. Why does the left support this? It doesn’t help liberalism, as Brexit showed. It isn’t moral or decent. It hurts young American children, while rewarding savages with the protection and comfort of a nation which they don’t in the least bit deserve.

There is no reason.

This is an ancient reproductive strategy, designed to see the competitively incompetent manipulate the social structures to screw everyone else up, while avoiding the consequences of their perfidy by claiming ignorance of it.

If the real motivations behind liberalism ever become widely known as the Apocalypse hits, I’d expect it to get a whole lot more apocalypsey for the left.

Anonymous Conservative #fundie anonymousconservative.com

The LGBTs want to take our rights:
"The Human Rights Campaign, the largest LGBTQ rights organization in the country, on Friday announced it is officially supporting stricter gun laws in the wake of the mass shooting at an Orlando gay nightclub last weekend.
The HRC’s Board of Directors made the decision Thursday evening during a special meeting, and agreed to support limiting access to assault weapons, expanding background checks, and limiting the ability of those on terror watch lists or with a history of domestic violence to obtain guns."

Rabbits don’t want conflict, and the powers that be don’t want a shit storm. Gun owners may, as a result of this type of action, genuinely create both – and they don’t even have to violate any laws to do so.
Most estimates are that there are around 8 million gays in the United States, though many question if that may just be an exaggeration designed to create an impression conducive to their goals. Personally I suspect it is closer to 3 million. Nevertheless, if these gays want to try and attack the rights of gun owners, all gun owners need to point out is that if they begin to feel hostile to gays, and begin to see gays as too emotional and illogical, they might begin to not believe the testimony of gays in trials.
If that happened, it would in effect jury-nullify all hate crimes laws, and possibly affect any trial involving a crime committed against a gay. Personally now, I am quite confident that nothing a gay says could be believed, if they cannot come to terms with the fact that Islamic fundamentalism, and not a gun, was the cause of the Orlando shooting. I can’t help but realize how that realization of their illogicality would contaminate any testimony from any gay in a trial setting. I would even question whether any physical evidence was manufactured by an overly emotional gay, unable to deal with simple reality as it exists.
To us, such an image of the future would be meaningless. But to an individual with an amygdala unable to confront even the slightest hardship, and terrified of the slightest threat, this realization would be horrifying.
There are about 102 million gun owners out there (32% of all Americans), and all a defense attorney would need to do is find one to put on the jury of a man who beat a gay guy, stabbed a transgender, or murdered a transvestite. Did a transgender man use the girls locker room when a pee wee swim team was changing, and get beaten to a pulp? Don’t think the beater is going to get convicted on the word of the gay. If gays think guns should be banned, then the gay’s testimony is meaningless, and I would assume any evidence had been fabricated in an overemotional meltdown.
I have to confront the fact that if gays are this unable to perceive simple reality, I could probably never vote to convict in any such case. I suspect if I had been on the trial of the Orlando shooter tomorrow, I am not sure I would have been able to vote guilty, given the stories of a second shooter, the gay holding the door shut, and the fact that the shooter himself appears to have been gay. It would all have been too convoluted, I suspect. I would probably have let him walk out the door of the courtroom a free man, and I would have felt it was the only moral outcome, given my convictions regarding the gay’s inability to perceive simple realties such as Islamic radicalism, and the fact guns reduce crime when the law abiding have them.
The potential consequences against gays would admittedly be dangerous. Millions of people who want to commit crime might begin targeting gays specifically, knowing that they would be unlikely to be convicted, given how all it would take is one of the 102 million gun owners to land on their jury – and the lawyers of the perpetrator would undoubtedly be looking for gun owners to put on the jury. Gang members, who need to kill somebody as an initiation might seek out gays as victims, thinking they would be a free kill, and sadly there would be nothing I could do about that. Those prone to engage in violence against gays specifically because of homophobia might be emboldened, and gay attacks could increase precipitously, and obviously all of those gay attackers going free without any consequence would be unfortunate.
However gays do not seem to consider our safety when contemplating their actions. They are all too happy to try and make us and our families less safe by preventing us from getting the guns we want to protect them. So the idea that gays would be less safe due to our realization that gays are too emotional and cannot be trusted, would not be of concern to me. I would have to vote my conscience – every time – and I suspect most other gun owners would as well. One thing we do well is vote.
If this idea were to spread widely, this development would have two effects. One, gays will be presented with an idea that advocating for gun control will bring real consequences they cannot control – something they are not designed to cope with. This is an open conflict stimulus which they are not designed to function in the presence of.
Two, the powers that be will realize they are bringing about a situation where the integrity of government will begin to be degraded. Once a group is, from a practical perspective, unable to appeal to the justice system for justice, it will not be long before the entire system’s foundation is in question. I suspect most politicians, rather than see this come to pass, would rather let everything cool off.
Perhaps this is the only path forward for the nation however – one step closer to Apocalypse.
If you as a gun owner feel this piece represents how you feel about this issue, please feel free to cut and paste this to your fellow gun owners, and publish it wherever you like – attributed or not, I couldn’t care less.