FSTDT

(Astronomers are Illuminati pawns)

That means, somewhere down the line, the astronomers who publish all this astronomical data know quite well, the Seleucid Period astronomical texts as represented in Ptolemy's canon are fake. Even so, they are playing the game of representing those fake lunar times as reasonable and scientiic, which distracts from the revisions for this period. Thus it would seem the "Illuminati" has a vested interest in suppressing any credible scientific evidence of these revisions and have influenced the academic world to the point of publishing correct solar eclipse times, but fake lunar eclipse times.

At least that is the "conspiracy theory" as it stands now.

So in practice, in case you didn't follow, when I find an astronomical text that references a lunar eclipse, I adjust it to the true time, based on 16:14 distortion for the SK400 in 541 BCE. That's for every single lunar ecilpse. I subtrct 16 hours and 14 minutes, adding or substracting a few minutes based on the delta-T variance from 541 BCE. But when it comes to solar eclipses, I don't make any adjustments at all!

So there must be a conspiracy to project the lunar times adjusted to the revised records of the revised chronology, while maintaining the accurately projected locations and times of solar eclipses.

Now that is an extremely desperate focus to prevent accidental discovery of the Persian Period revisions.

But too bad we've already discovered it.

Maybe, at this time of "freedom of information" it still is too big of an embarrassment to astronomers who sold out under the pressure of the Illuminati or whomever to misrepresent lunar times in their canons. Thus correcting the timeline to what it originally was opens up too big of a can of worms, so scholars can't respond to the new evidence. They have to protect old lies.

Oh well.

At least we know the level of desperation and infiltration into academic disciplines the Illuminati has sunk. Redating the 1st of Cyrus to 455 BCE, apparently is not an option for them. They've dug themselves in way too deep at this point. The international community would be outraged to find out this level of deception. It's best to just keep on lying, apparently.

[Concerning the OP's lesbian sister]

I want to warn you that I have a tendency to be bossy, and that doesn't combine well with written words when you can't hear the tone. So if you can hear me talking in the kindest and gentlest way, that is the way I mean them.

... If your sister brole with her girlfriend and lived the rest of her life in perfect chastity and service to others, she would not be reconciled to God. The problem is not with this one thing that she is doing, but with WHO she is. WHO she is is a child of wrath. It is not because of her girlfriend. She has a girlfriend as one of the many outworkings of the innate wickedness in her heart. Her heart is overflowing with evil, malice, and contempt. Moment by moment she exercises her hatred and rebellion against God in everything she thinks, says, and does, and everything she fails to think, say, and do. When she makes her breakfast in the morning it is out of hatred and contempt for the God who graciously provides her with it. Her soul is not doomed under the full measure of the wrath of God because she's shacking up with a girl, but because she hates God in her innermost desires. She is God's enemy.

And for her neighbor it is even worse. Everyday she thinks, says, does things out of hatred and contempt for her neighbors, whether through, gossip, slander, reviling, envy, anger, lust, or pride. She also shows her hatred everday by failing to love others in the things that she fails or forgets to think, say, and do. These things make her and ALL of us utterly guilty before God, and justly deserving of the full measure of the cup of God's wrath.

For unbelievers hellfire and damnation are coming swiftly on the wings of death because we've all earned it. None of us are seeking God. None of us are just a little bit good.