www.overwhelmingevidence.com

quizzlestick #fundie overwhelmingevidence.com

There's a new wiki and it's going to blow Wikipedia out of the water. Imagine an educational resource like Wikipedia but free of the Anti-American, Anti-Christian, Pro-materialistic bias.

I'm sure WIkipedia is great if you want to learn about "Gangsta Rap", "Gang-banging" or catch up with the latest gossip about Britney Spears, but is that what we want our kids to be learning? Our kids should be learning about scientific facts like ID, and the history of America our Christian founding fathers.

Conservapedia is just the right sort of thing for those of us who are homeschooling. Where else can you find an accurate reference for all of the world's most interesting issues, and be sure that the articles are 100% free of bias, spin and political correctness.

This page explains the fundamental differences between WIkipedia and Conservapedia. I do hope you will join me and submit a few articles. May I suggest that with the author's permission, some articles from this site might be donated to help build Conservapedia?

quizzlestick #fundie overwhelmingevidence.com

We at OverwhelmingEvidence.com call upon evolutionists to either justify their beliefs in the harsh light of these truths or give up their racket as soon as possible. These matters are far to important to be entrusted to credulous fools who believe everything they read in a 200 year old science-book.

HaEris #fundie overwhelmingevidence.com

There will always be a fundamentalist group who have blinded themselves to the myriad of holes in the argument for Evolution. Intelligent Design may be the only alternative, but these fundamentalists cannot accept ID because their entire belief system makes them biased against it.

HeLa #fundie overwhelmingevidence.com

I agree with the OE blogger Helena Blavatsky who suggested that the Darwinists' weak-spot is their addiction to scientific-naturalism, otherwise known as the “materialist assumption” - the nihilistic conjecture that the only things worth thinking about are the mundane. I concur that we have to show the flaws in materialism if we are to engage the scientific community and show the folly of evolutionary dogma, but what shall we replace it with?

quizzlestick #fundie overwhelmingevidence.com

When somebody tells me that they do not believe that non-material explainations are valid, I allways ask them how they account for mankind's innate God-knowledge. This perception of God, and our ability to have a personal relationship with Jesus Christ is a great example of something that will never be explained by materialism.