Hillary: All 17 of our security agencies say that Russia hacked our national computer systems
Why in the hell do we have 17 security agencies?
With all of these security agencies guarding us, how in the hell did Russia (or anyone else) break in to our government servers? Are these agencies incompetent or what?
And in particular, why was our state department's servers so vulnerable to hackers?
Is this a sample of how a president Hillary will secure our nation's secrets?
20 comments
not sure that this is fundy.
maybe there is inflation of competing agencies that step in each other toes, while important issues could end in area with no clear authority or responsibility. after 9/11 data shown that many agencies got partial information before the attacks, but lack of communication prevent full understanding.
the system isn't perfect, and there nothing fundy in questioning it.
that issue is much bigger than the elections.
When it comes to the internet or tech these'll be contracted agencies overseen by official agencies.
Why do you need so many military divisions?
Not fundie but in the arena as it's typical conservative "We don't need so much government, one Cowboy with a Colt could do that entire job!". No one undermines the system like 'true patriots'.
> Anyone who complains about this security should be sentenced into trying to enforce IT security policies on people who don't care.
Amen brother! Preach it!
I would mention that there are worse situations, like being a consultant that's supposed to help prevent future IT disasters but being repeatedly told that "we don't need that," but I doubt our 17 security agencies are as bad as [company name redacted].
Trump went to the security briefing, then didn't listen. He was told that the hackers were in Russia. He then lied about it, on live TV, which is about as public as it gets. I don't trust someone who can stand up and lie about a thing, even though he knew that the public knew he was lying!
Ah, I see this was posted on the 19th - before the latest attack came through our Tivos and thermostats.
I've seen a lot of similar whines on Twitter - people can't comprehend that agencies like the Coast Guard and DEA really do have to deal with Russian threats constantly. One nitwit said we couldn't trust intelligence agencies because they "colluded" - apparently forgetting that the Dept of Homeland Security was formed precisely because agencies failed to "collude" enough.
Why in the hell do we have 17 security agencies?
... Well evidentially you need them with a breach like that.
Come on, Hillary, you're the only thing between America and Trump and I'd like for that to actually sound inspiring rather than an excuse for a man to drink himself into unconsciousness.
Donald Fart would let China have access to the DoD's black projects if there was a cool billion or so in it for him; he does have that $900 million tax loss after all.
They can send it to him in one of their J-20s.
Now, I wonder why Russia doesn't have something equal to our Queen Elizabeth-class carriers...?! [/GCHQ]
"Anyone who complains about this security should be sentenced into trying to enforce IT security policies on people who don't care."
Bingo! Or at least trying to run an office where everyone else is computer-illiterate, but thinks they can do your job better than you can because none of them realize how hard actual computer programming can be. I had a huge argument with a secretary who was telling me that I was wrong about how the program worked because she could SEE a number in a specific place in the program, even though I, you know, WROTE the damned thing.
"Is this a sample of how a president Hillary will secure our nation's secrets?"
Mein Trumpf will build a wall around each of our computers, and Russia will pay for them.
@niv
"not sure that this is fundy."
Haven't you figured out? Criticism against the Goddess-Empress Hitllery Cunt IS a display of fundieness.
You too will be quoted for your transgression against Her Holyness.
Fundie = being right-wing or disagreeing with the left
Donald Trump commits felony Obstruction of justice by destroying thousands of emails subpoenaedby a federal judge during legal hearings against Trump
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2016/06/13/trump-accused-destroying-email-evidence-lawsuit-10-years-ago-republican-hillary-president/85795082/
(What was that about Hillary & emails, Trumptards? And at least she wasn't asking the leader of a foreign power to compromise the telecommunications system of her own country )
...and unless the failtroll isn't forcing the likes of Breitfart & Free Repubic to be completely neutral, then he has no right to think of accusing FSTDT of so-called 'Bias'.
Still unable to read the FAQ, I see: or too cowardly to do so, because if you did, you'd realise that you have no right to be here. So go ahead: force all other right-wing sites to be pro -Hillary: every second you're not, you're admitting that FSTDT has more than every right in the world to be anti -rightist, so you'd best get your arse to all rightist sites in the WWW and make them neutral at least. Go on, chop-chop!
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.