The reason we haven't found transitional fossils is because they don't exist.
--
If it were real, evolution would be the leading cause of death in the world.
23 comments
"The reason we haven't found transitional fossils is because they don't exist. "
Aw shit, my record's broken again.
So, all those fossils we've found suddenly don't count because... you say they don't?
Haha, no. Fuck off and die.
If it were real, evolution would be the leading cause of death in the world.
Wrong. Death is the leading cause of evolution in the world.
Seriously, guys, I think I just realized something. Creationists think part of evolution is that organisms become less fit for a few generations, so they can "become" something better down the line. We need to make it clearer to them that transitional species were still better adapted than their answers (outside of sudden shifts in environment).
"The reason we haven't found transitional fossils is because they don't exist."
Except we have
--
"If it were real, evolution would be the leading cause of death in the world."
Well *technically* think about the antibiotic resistant strains of bacteria... those kill people, and their a product of evolution. And our gross overuse of antibiotics (insert something about natural selection here). But aside form that, how exactly would evolution kill someone?
No matter how many fossils we find between point A and point B, they will always want us to find a fossil between the ones we have.
It's like trying to find out how many points there are between 0 and 1.
Oh and birth is the leading cause of death. Nobody gets out alive.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.