'Falsified' means that it can be proven to NOT have occurred, instead of the evidence of it occurring is inconclusive.
To be consistent, why is it that evolutionists never 'falsified' creation, but replaced it with the religion of evolution?
Evolutionists can't come up with observation and facts, so this is the new tactic they fall back on.
25 comments
This calls for "we have the fossils, we win!"-picture. I am too lazy to search it now. So much to read, so little time ...
Falsified means that some guy made up something with their own hands to prove their theory. Fossiles weren´t, DNA samples weren´t. And, now I'm thinking, you don´t even know what they are.
"creationism", "god" and related concept ARE NOT FALSIFIABLE. Because that "god"guy of yours is supposedly omjipotent, and if he wants it to look like its 13 billion years old and developed through evolution, he makes it look exactly like it. With Genesis its more problematic (he created light before the sun... so I guzess he first created light everywhere out of nowhere, then deleted that version of light and replaced it by ligfht coming from the sun... and so on... which makes absolutely no sense, but thats what omnipotence does.)
@Coffee
The creation story as told in both versions of Genesis has been falsified for the past 150 years. Find a coupon, buy a clue. image
Geological samples do not indicate a six-day creation.
Fossil records do not indicate a six-day creation.
Red shift does not indicate a six-day creation.
DNA records do not indicate a six-day creation.
Where are your records?
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
