Home Archives Random Quotes Latest Comments Top 100 Submit Quote Search Log In

Quote# 35610

Actually, it takes very little "qualification in the sciences" to totally refute naturalistic macro-evolution. The process has never once been observed to occur in recorded human history, it breaks numerous "laws" of nature, and it is essentially based on circular reasoning and irrational conclusions. Indeed, it requires more "faith" to believe in evolution than any other theory of origins! Why shouldn't evangelical apologists be qualified to argue against it?

drmark, FaithCommunityNetwork 5 Comments [2/29/2008 2:11:19 PM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Drekoguk
WTF?! || meh
Username:
Comment:



1
Tom S. Fox

Bullshit, bullshit, bullshit!

5/24/2008 2:29:32 PM



...Because they don't understand it?

12/22/2011 7:40:19 AM

Justanotheratheist

I hope I'm getting a new irony meter for Christmas. This one just died.

12/22/2011 10:24:19 AM



Actually, it takes very little "qualification in the sciences" to totally refute naturalistic macro-evolution.

I agree, "naturalistic macro-evolution" is a complete hogwash. The study of biological evolution (a.k.a. evolutionary biology), on the other hand, is scientific fact. Thank you very much drmark for clearing this up.

12/22/2011 11:26:51 AM

JohnTheAtheist

Ohhh, I know! Because evangelical apologists are by definition stupid douchebags???

12/22/2011 11:33:53 AM
1