1 2
#700247
LOLWUT
Just because Kent Hovind worked as a science teacher doesn't mean he should have.
Please go to the library. Look up science resources online. With luck, it's not too late to save your brain.
9/27/2008 6:32:01 AM
#700248
Yaezakura
Actually, no, the fossil record indicates no such thing, you fucking moron. Trust me, many scientists, even evolutionary scientists, are Christian or otherwise religious. If they could actually prove that a global flood happened, it would be a Noble Prize winning discovery. Yet not a single piece of evidence exists to support that such a thing ever happened.
9/27/2008 6:33:01 AM
#700258
DarkfireTaimatsu
scientific evidence for creationism
There is none. The end.
9/27/2008 6:48:32 AM
#700263
The Outsider
Many creationists misinterpet the scientific evidence for evolution because it doesn't fit their faith-based assumptions.
Perfect fix.
9/27/2008 6:53:55 AM
#700265
Tom S. Fox
@LOLWUT: Kent Hovind never worked as a science teacher.
As you may know, he is a liar.
9/27/2008 6:54:42 AM
#700266
Imroy
"Many creationists misinterpret the scientific evidence for evolution and an old earth because it doesn't fit their faith-based assumptions."
There, fixed it for you.
damn, too late.
9/27/2008 6:55:00 AM
#700271
Dark_Lord_Prime
"Many evolutionists misinterpret the 'scientific' evidence for creationism because it only fits our faith-based assumptions. I would also point out that the fossil record demonstrates a catastrophic global flood which buried millions of plants and animals, but that is a discussion for another thread, because I just pulled that 'fact' out of my ass and have no evidence to support it."
Uber-fix'd!
9/27/2008 7:02:37 AM
#700273
LOLWUT
That's interesting, I thought he really did work as a teacher for 15 years just as he said. But then someone should have known about it I guess...
9/27/2008 7:04:51 AM
#700280
Detrs
No, we don't; no it doesn't.
Now, stop lying.
9/27/2008 7:19:06 AM
#700281
Mortok
So, "Dr. Mark", are you a REAL doctor, or a doctor like "Dr Pepper" is a doctor?
9/27/2008 7:20:10 AM
#700366
Eden
Many Creationists misinterpret the scientific evidence for evolution because it doesn't fit their faith-based assumptions. They would also mix together real mass extinction events (like the Cretaceous–Tertiary extinction) with evidences for local floods, despite the fact that they happened millions of years aparts, to construct together some "evidence" for a global flood like described in the bible or even resort to outright forgeries, to construct evidence for huzmans and dinosaurs alking together.
9/27/2008 10:01:56 AM
#700384
Michael
Perhaps you should ask Kent Hovind for his sources.
But check the visiting hours first.
9/27/2008 10:16:14 AM
#700397
aaa
Hovind is a mere fraud.
9/27/2008 10:29:53 AM
#700445
kingoftheheavies
@LOLWUT: Kent Hovind never worked as a science teacher.
As you may know, he is a liar.
And a thief. And is having gay sex right this very minute. Prison will do that to you...
9/27/2008 12:55:55 PM
#700467
Ambrielle
Many evolutionists misinterpet the scientific evidence for creationism because it doesn't fit their faith-based assumptions.
Does. Not. Compute.
9/27/2008 1:33:06 PM
#700491
scientific evidence for creationism
I couldn't care less. I know Creationism is real. Creation, on the other hand...
9/27/2008 1:48:51 PM
#700520
Horsefeathers
"Many evolutionists misinterpet the scientific evidence for creationism because it doesn't fit their faith-based assumptions."
You seem to have confused "evolutionists" and "creationists".
"I would also point out that the fossil record demonstrates a catastrophic global flood which buried millions of plants and animals, but that is discussion for another thread."
Care to explain why we always find the same creatures in the same layers without exception if a flood did it?
And don't use that lame ass "hydrological sorting" bullshit either. It's been refuted far too often to go resorting to it.
9/27/2008 2:22:31 PM
#700535
wackadoodle
"hydrological sorting"? The hell does that mean? Because it sounds like their actually claiming the goddamn water sorted the fossils into the exact layers they should be in if those heathen geologists where right. That bullshit these people come up with to fit the evidence to their 'beliefs'.
9/27/2008 2:42:49 PM
#700536
Quantum Mechanic
Make up shit much?
9/27/2008 2:43:36 PM
#700543
Bored One-time Poster
Yes, yes of course. Evolution is faith-based, but the water needed to cover the entire Earth just spontaneously appears and disappears when it's convenient.
Considering that you gave no evidence or citation for the first sentence of your comment, you may as well discuss that huge flood on the same thread. Starting with citation.
9/27/2008 2:50:06 PM
#700552
John
Many evolutionists misinterpet the scientific evidence for creationism because it doesn't fit their faith-based assumptions.
There isn't any scientific evidence for creationism. Evidence for creationism requires evidence of a creator - something no one has ever been able to come up with, despite 2,500 years of trying. It also requires a scientific explanation of the method by which the the creation was accomplished. Creationists don't offer any positive evidence for creationism. Instead, they simply attack evolution. Creationism relies on what the courts have called a "contrived dualism" - that arguments against evolution are automatically arguments for creationism.
9/27/2008 2:54:40 PM
#700837
Old Viking
How can evolutionists misinterpret the scientific evidence for creationism when christianists have yet to offer any?
9/27/2008 8:21:44 PM
#700849
Grigadil
Cretinism does not mesh with any natural trend in the real space-time continuum. It may apply in your dreamworld, but few live there.
9/27/2008 8:29:19 PM
#700850
Quantum Mechanic
Still wrong.
9/27/2008 8:29:52 PM
#700854
anonymous_troy
No, the fossil record was clearly put down in multiple layers over a long time.
9/27/2008 8:31:14 PM
1 2