1
#1455965
UHM
The nick and the last line stolen from Conservapedia's Ken make me think this one's a parodist.
10/8/2012 4:06:42 AM
#1456005
gravematter
The mirror's so shiny this must be a poe. At least, I hope so.
10/8/2012 5:11:58 AM
#1456008
Doubting Thomas
A lame attempt to switch the burden of proof. Nothing to see here.
10/8/2012 5:15:53 AM
#1456034
Miser Spak
I have seen many make wild claims like "there is a creator", or "i dont lie" or "I disproved evolution/global warming/Obamas birth certificate" or "The Bible is historically infallible" :- but I never see ansy evidence presented.
So if you are credible where is the evidence for these claims?
If you are credible why dont you present evidence?
I never see you present evidence fundiesm is true - so if you have any credibility where is your evidence?
10/8/2012 5:53:16 AM
#1456046
Darwin
"I never see you present evidence atheism is true"
We don't need to bother. We see atheism as the default position, everything after that requires evidence.
10/8/2012 6:05:50 AM
#1456051
SpukiKitty
Why would I listen to the rants of a hyper-capitalistic space alien who looks like Ross Perot?
10/8/2012 6:14:12 AM
#1456059
dionysus
How do you prove that you don't lie? Go back in time and record every word you've ever said since you gained the ability to speak? What if you mistakenly call your brother "da-da"? Does that count as a lie?
10/8/2012 6:28:17 AM
#1456084
Anon-e-moose
"I never see you present evidence atheism is true - so if you have any credibility where is your evidence?"
Everything manufactured/result of a manufacturing process. As in man - i.e. scientific - made. Not 'God'.
And most of what is nnatural - certainly agricultural - is due to the human manipulation of crops (either cross-pollination/fertilisation centuries ago, or genetic manipulation in labs today) to increase yields/pest ressutant.
This is our world. Deal with it.
10/8/2012 7:03:50 AM
#1456092
Stonespiral
Rabbits do not chew cud like your bible says they do when it describes them as unclean. They perform an action called 'bruxing' where they grind their teeth. Most most critters with continually growing teeth do this.
That's just one inaccuracy in your holy book. And if there is one, it's not infallible and to be discarded.
Right?
10/8/2012 7:20:58 AM
#1456120
Pule Thamex
Atheism is definitely true cos it said so in a book I once saw, the 1989 Desk Diary.
All hail Lord Athe.
10/8/2012 8:29:49 AM
#1456135
Swede
Atheism isn't true or false, it's a viewpoint. We see no evidence for the existence of any gods or higher beings, and until such evidence presents itself, we will live our lives as if there are no such higher beings.
There is no signs of a creator or creators.
I do lie, occasionally, but I don't tell kids that fairy tales and myths are real.
Christianity is also a viewpoint and can't really be disproven like that.
The Bible IS historically unreliable. Just try to add up the four gospels; they don't match each other. When was Jesus born? Was it a few years before Year Zero or a few years after? Why have none of the civilization, that are older than the one mentioned in the Bible, any story of a world-wide flood? They ought to have noticed, right?
10/8/2012 9:06:45 AM
#1456179
Ebon
You don't see evidence because you don't want to.
10/8/2012 10:08:52 AM
#1456180
"I never see you present evidence atheism is true"
Prove a lack of something? Seriously?? Name anything you don't believe in, then provide evidence for your lack of belief... when you can do that, we'll talk.
10/8/2012 10:09:24 AM
#1456192
Joe Mama
Why is it that no Christians ever provide total, conclusive proof that God exists? If he really does exist, it should be easy.
As far as the bible being historically unreliable, there's no evidence a worldwide flood ever happened, and plenty of evidence that the earth is older than 6,000 years.
10/8/2012 10:21:40 AM
#1456218
John_in_Oz
What evidence would you like? The fact that no holy book correctly describes the world, or that no believers prayers get answered better than random chance? How about the internal contradictions of holy books, or the mindless laws of nature that correctly describe what holy books mistakenly ascribe to miracles?n No believer who prayed "lord let me live until your return" ever had his prayers answered.
Evidence enough.
10/8/2012 11:01:26 AM
#1456252
John
It's virtually impossible to prove something doesn't exist. We can never prove God, Big Foot or the Loch Ness monster don't exist. On the other hand, no one has shown that there's any reason to believe they do exist. If you're willing to believe something simply because it hasn't been disproved, then you're a gullible sucker who will believe almost anything.
10/8/2012 12:14:53 PM
#1456255
Osiris
I have seen many make wild claims like "There is a Creator", or "I can prove Christianity" or "The Bible is historically reliable" but I have never seen any evidence presented.
Also known as, the more accurate version of that sentence.
10/8/2012 12:32:21 PM
#1456267
Creedence Leonore Gielgud
10/8/2012 1:05:28 PM
#1456285
Mech610
The fact that this guy is called 'Ferengi' is funnier to me than his whole quote. Who would choose to call themselves a Ferengi? Like seriously, in recent memory there was one Ferengi who showed up in the whole series who wasn't an idiotic sexist douchebag and that was that scientist who invented a new kind of shield and got murdered.
10/8/2012 2:42:15 PM
#1456287
Old Viking
This is to thinking as tic-tac-toe is to chess.
10/8/2012 2:44:37 PM
#1456300
blackrat
Funny, on YouTube there are thousands of videos labeled"undeniable proof that atheists are wrong" or "undeniable proof that god is real" how do u expect me to believe that when a crazy old man says that the "mission impossible" game for PC is proof? Or some British guy who tells me monkeys were made because god thinks monkeys are funny.
10/8/2012 3:15:39 PM
#1456303
\m/>_<\m/
he hasn't studied hagiography or the sources of the bible's creation has he?
10/8/2012 3:21:46 PM
#1456308
farpadokly
Nice. I see what you've done there. The old turn of the tables. Atheists ask you for evidence, so you ask them for evidence. Very clever, and so original too. Absolutely no-one has ever tried that one before.
10/8/2012 3:30:22 PM
#1456515
Dyz
Correct; Russels teapot goes both ways. Claiming atheism is true is unreasonable. Claiming agnostic atheism is the most reasonable position when evidence is lacking is not unreasonable.
10/9/2012 6:21:59 AM
#1456749
Snarker
His grammer makes me want to vomit my brain out.
CLEAN UP AISLE 6!
10/9/2012 3:46:26 PM
1