This is important because we have to take the world back for Christ!
AiG is winning the debate!
I will never send my kids to public schools to become Darwinists. I will teach them real Biblical science because I am a scientist at AiG!
I used to be a secular scientist but all the Darwinist journals rejected my work because I am a YEC. After all this persecution, I went to AiG and they accepted me.
DARWINISTS EXPOSED!!
65 comments
So, there, creistard, do you suppose AiG would take on a guy who's a "Darwinist," or would they "persecute" him?
Yes, you are a YEC and it's a bit disgusting in an adult.
A degree in basket weaving, mumbo-jumbo, or bottle-washing does not make you a scientist in as much as console gaming does not make you a soldier.
Hm... no, it's a poe. It's just a little too over-the-top.
And by over-the-top I mean BAT FUCK INSANE.
You're that guy that keeps claiming to be a scientist in spite of the blatant evidence provided by your own posts...
Here's a hint: Scientists know there is no such thing as 'Darwinism' or 'Evolutionism'.
There's social darwinism, of course, but that's an unrelated idiocy. Like what the Westboro Baptist Church is to Christianity.
To quote the most hated man by these fucktards, I think Charles Darwin put it best when he said:
"Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge: it is those who know little, and not those who know much, who so positively assert that this or that problem will never be solved by science."
Apparently, according to these so called “mathematists”, pi is 3.142.... or something, it goes on forever, apparently. But it says in the babble that pi is 3!
According to “circle theory”, the area of a circle is pi*radius^2. But this doesn't produce the right results when pi is 3, so it's wrong!
HOLY SHIT this is pissing me off. these people go on like anyone who accepts evolution worships darwin! HE WAS JUST A MAN who came up with an idea, he's also not the only one who has worked on the theory of evolution. SCIENCE IS DIFFERENT TO RELIGION dickhead, there is no "darwinist" group of people you fucktard, there are people who think he's right, but they don't worship him..
"I used to be a secular scientist but all the Darwinist journals rejected my work because I am a YEC."
Oh, so you're not a real scientist.
Answers in Genesis is no more a scientific institution than I am a coelacanth.
There is no such thing as biblical science (can't be verified or reproduced).
This idiot Creationist's home-taught kids will end up flipping burgers.
Young Earth Creation advocates will feel persecuted because their 'creationism' is not a science, so they can't get scientific posts. That is why they end up in fake science jobs in phony fundy institutions.
They should be in mental institutions if they can't understand that.
fergus
"DARWINISTS EXPOSED!!"? For what? I assume that by "DARWINISTS" you mean scientists. What were they exposed for? Only publishing scientifically sound papers? Rejecting religious conjecture?
Also, I'd like to inform you that Answers is in Genesis is not currently engaged in any sort of debate. The entire sane population of the world is collectively pointing and laughing at them.
Er, right. Journals do not reject submissions with "YEC" stamped on them, but usually return them with a number of reviewer comments which you are supposed to address.
For example, had you claimed that the age of the oceans could be determined from their salt content to be only a few thousand years old, a reviewer might have pointed out geological evidence to the contrary, or mentioned "residency times", or pointed out errors in your calculated influx rates.
To be published, you need to address these problems in your paper, not put your fingers in your ears and go "LALALALALA!"
That was your first mistake...
g'ddang darwinists, fired me cause iI proposed the cure to cancer to be fairy-dust
but then, AiG accepted me
BOO-YEAH!! DARWINISTS EXPOSED AGAIN!!!!
Another AiG scientist? Or, is it the same one?
Either way, who cares. Keep your kid at home. Fine by me; that way we don't have to deal with idiot parents fucking with the public education process.
1.) Christ's death and Ressurection took the world back. Learn what that miracle means.
2.) AiG has added a series of claims Creationists should not use, and that list grows and evidence is found that debunks their beliefs. Who's winning?
3.) Science and AiG do not belong in the same sentence.
4.) No.
I am going to call Poe on this one.
"I am a scientist at AiG!"
I THINK I FOUND UR PROBLEM LULZ
Yeah I'm glad you could go somewhere where other idiots will ignore how wrong you all are.
Because deep down, science is really about human understanding and Christian love and making each other feel like you aren't mortal specks of dust in the cosmos.
"This is important because we have to take the world back for Christ!"
AIG? how did an auto insurance company get involved in this argument? what you going to do? Run me over with your car when you cant win?
So.....how much does it pay to be a "biblical Scientist?"
I have a Biology degree from a major university, and if the price is right, I might be convinced to switch.
It's not like I'd have to work or anything.
A broken record has been playing ever since Darwin came up with his theory of evolution. Listen:
Just because you repeat something doesn't mean it's true.
"a scientist of AiG"
Are "Darwinists exposed" because they only take tangible evidence?
You're neither evolved nor rational, stupid. Most Bonobos are more evolved than you are.
Good, don't send your kids to schools to become evil doctors, dentists, engineers, or scientists; the world needs ditch diggers, garbage collectors, and burger flippers too. They make such good money and have such fulfilling careers.
I used to be a secular scientist but all the Darwinist journals rejected my work because I am a YEC.
I think we found the problem.
I will never send my kids to public schools to become Darwinists.
Would it be OK if they would become Wallaceists, then?
"AiG is winning the debate!"
Ah, cre(a)ti(o)nist. Still in that river in Egypt about how much you lost that bet on who would win in Kitzmiller vs. Dover , eh? That must've hurt so much, even I heard your wallet scream from this side of the Atlantic.
You're certainly in that river in Paris, if you think the Cre(a)ti(o)nist debate still has any credibility, post that day in late 2005.
(un)'Intelligent Design'. Cre(a)ti(o)nists Exposed! >:D
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
