navaros

Navaros #fundie imdb.com

[things between quote marks were from another poster]

"Let's take a little test."


Sure, I always pass tests about godliness with a 100% score.

"Is the Bible inerrant?"

Yes - but it depends on the particular translation you are talking about. Some modern translations are not inerrant, because they have been translated and corrupted by evil darwinists/Satanists/liberals/feminists etc.

"Should it be taken literally?"

That depends on if you are talking about parts that are given as literal history (like Genesis), or parts that are not (i.e. parables).

"Is it historically accurate?"

Of course it is. How stupid of a question can you ask?!

"Count yourself 33% towards representing a fundamentalist position for each positive answer"

Fundamentalists:

1. Originated in the 1900s A.D.

2. Formed as a response to the apostate church that came before them.

3. Presuppose that the apostate church to which they responded has some legitimacy.

In contrast, the godly kind of Navaros a.k.a. the real church of God:

1. Originated at the dawn of mankind, with Adam.

2. Is not a response to the apostate church. In fact, the opposite is true - the apostate church is a [evil, debased, corrupted] response to the real church of God a.k.a the godly kind of Navaros.

3. Fully and unequivocally renounces all apostasy, and does not afford even the smallest iota of legitimacy to the apostate church.

Therefore, contrary to your implications, your attempt to label me as a "fundamentalist" is a fail. They may have some similarities to me in that I believe in the Bible and they do too, but they also have major differences to me (which I've just described) that distinguish them as not quite up to par to God's standards, in contrast to myself, who is as perfect of a representative of God as has ever been on the earth after the time of the Apostles.

"Methinks this poe protests too much."

By calling me poe again, you only further highlight your own hypocrisy & evil. And God will count that against you as among your many sins when you come before His Judgement Seat.


"the fact that you are a poe is clear enough to me"

You are liar - that quoted statement proves it. Add lying to your sin count tally. Good luck trying to justify lying about an approved workman of God to God.

"Mr God's Spokesman, with the Holy Penis, sorry."

Why do you object to the fact of God's Penis? There is only one reason why the ungodly ever do that: because they hate nothing more than the fact that God is the ultimate Masculine Male King Patriarch Father who eventually will Judge and serve Justice to all evil feminist scum (that includes darwinists like yourself who support the evil agenda of evil feminist scum).

"I always forgive those who are personally rude to me. "

Ha ha, that's hilarious, you trying to represent yourself as a saintly do-gooder, even though in this post I've just written, I have proven at great length how you are a hypocrite, a liar, and your heart is full of hate for me as evidenced by your need continuously to insult me and defecate all over my work because the Righteousness that God & I stand for is diametrically opposed to your love for evil.

Navaros #fundie imdb.com

Fundamentalists:

1. Originated in the 1900s A.D.

2. Formed as a response to the apostate church that came before them.

3. Presuppose that the apostate church to which they responded has some legitimacy.

In contrast, the godly kind of Navaros a.k.a. the real church of God:

1. Originated at the dawn of mankind, with Adam.

2. Is not a response to the apostate church. In fact, the opposite is true - the apostate church is a [evil, debased, corrupted] response to the real church of God a.k.a the godly kind of Navaros.

3. Fully and unequivocally renounces all apostasy, and does not afford even the smallest iota of legitimacy to the apostate church.

Therefore, contrary to your implications, your attempt to label me as a "fundamentalist" is a fail. They may have some similarities to me in that I believe in the Bible and they do too, but they also have major differences to me (which I've just described) that distinguish them as not quite up to par to God's standards, in contrast to myself, who is as perfect of a representative of God as has ever been on the earth after the time of the Apostles.

Navaros #racist imdb.com


[statements in quotes are from the poster Navaros was answering]

"then why does Tessa Thompson’s character’s boyfriend, a white man, come off as the character who’s the most honest, has the most integrity and isn’t vilified for his skin color? "

He doesn't. You make it sound like he is some kind of deep, multi-dimensional character! ROFL. He's a one-dimensional cardboard cut-out. His only point in the film is to provide sex scenes which demonstrate that the main heroine character is a slut. But of course, being liberal nutjob propaganda, the film tries to represent her sluttiness as a good thing to be glorified.

And yes, he is vilified for his skin color by the black thugs who hate him because he is banging the heroine slut that they want all to themselves (even though some of them are also banging her simultaneously).

"by the way, “racistly" isn’t a word."


If I say it, it's a word. If it wasn't a word before I said it, then it has become a word henceforth after I've said it.

"it needs to start with thorough education on all parties to teach people from an early age the harm of superiority."


If you really believe that, then you should be condemning this film and this TV show for promoting black superiority.

Navaros #fundie imdb.com

darwin a 'genius', ...way to worship your god again in grand idolatry, darwinists. [[roll]]

I wonder if they are gonna put signs around his 'heritage home' celebrating his/their incest heritage, showing all the places he banged his cousin in his incest/heritage home? Oh wait, that would be bad for PR and when something is bad for PR darwinists just sweep it under the rug and pretend it doesn't exist...so guess they won't be doing that.

Navaros #fundie imdb.com

[Science is constantly striving to correct itself. What's wrong with that?]

There would be no possible room to "correct" itself unless its original claims were untrue bull crap in the first place. The new "corrected" claims are untrue bull crap too, which is why they in turn become "corrected" later on as well, with additional untrue bull crap. It's a never-ending cycle of untrue bull crap, all of which is falsely presented as "fact."

Navaros #fundie imdb.com

Fundamentalism is a sect from the early 1900's that has nothing whatsoever to do with anything that I stand for. I believe and act in accordance with how godly people have always believed and acted since the dawn of mankind, starting with Adam. My form of godliness predates "Fundamentalism" by several thousands of years. The fact that you and other ignorant darwinists nevertheless associate me with a relatively new sect from the 1900's displays your profound ignorance of God.

Navaros #fundie imdb.com


I'm not an expert on the minutiae of how exactly Noah built his ark...but I'm not sure what you keep harping on about. You seem to be implying that Noah didn't use steel or support plates or bolts. How do you know those things?

Navaros #fundie imdb.com

atheists are bitter because they know that that according to their own belief system, their lives have no purpose and no meaning and after they expire from their pointless lives, all that awaits them is nothingness.

On top of that, many of them are also bitter because although they never admit it out loud, they realize deep down that the Bible is correct and that they will one day have to give an account to God for their evil ways, and so they are terrified of what will happen to them when they come before the Judgement Seat of Christ.

So all of that bitterness manifests itself into the constant mocking/insulting/hateful attacks against God, morality, and anyone who does not share their worldview. When they do that, atheists are patting themselves on the back and giving each other winks & nudges as if to say: "Although our existences are pointless, and although many of us are secretly terrified at having to one day give an account of our lives to God, at least we can make ourselves feel better by calling ourselves more intelligent than those who do not share our beliefs."

Navaros #fundie imdb.com

So-called 'women' have the power to murder their unborn babies and not be prosecuted for those murders. In other words, they can and do quite literally get away with murder. There is no greater power that anyone could possibly have than to get away with murder. That is the most egregious & outright abominable example, and no others are even needed to prove the point that your claim of "men having the power" is utter bull.

But I'll still give other examples too anyway.

Women also have the power to steal half of men's assets and all of their children in divorce court, and furthermore, they have the power to leech tons of money off of their victim - for no legitimate reason - for the rest of his life.

Women also have the power to get men fired and hence leave him unable to survive via bogus "sexual harassment" claims: to be clear, I'm not justifying actual harassment, but what I'm saying is that women can fabricate claims of "harassment" that never happened, and the innocent man will always be found guilty just because of the same sexist attitude that the OP points out and which has spread like a cancer throughout all societies run by liberal/SJW/feminist crazies (which appallingly, is most of them).

Likewise, they also have the power to to fabricate false claims of "rape" that never really happened, and when they do, the innocent man will again always be found guilty, imprisoned, and have his reputation ruined. Of course, I'm not defending actual rape.

Navaros #fundie imdb.com

[Are seldom actual scientists. Or at least not scientists who work within the relevant disciplines. Most actual scientists agree that evolution is scientific.]

The 'scientists' you refer to in the quoted text are darwinists, not actual scientists. They may slap a misnomer 'scientist' label onto themselves, but they are certainly not scientists. Scientists obey the scientific method. darwinists, like the ones you refer to in the quoted text, do not.

[How often do you find biologists (and with no strong underlying religious motivations, only scientific ones) coming out against evolution and for creationism/ID? ]

All the darwinists you refer to support darwinism solely because darwinism is their religion and they have underlying religious motivations to zealously spread propaganda to promote their faith-based opinions about it to the exclusion of all other points of view, and suppress all other points of view. The people you are referring to are doing exactly the thing you complain about in the quoted text: coming out against creationism/ID due to their underlying religious motivations.

Navaros #fundie imdb.com

There is no such thing as 'fundamentalist,' except for darwinist/atheists fundamentalists who rabidly stalk, steal from, slander, attack, and try to silence anyone who speaks out against their worldview.

Navaros #fundie imdb.com

I am going to nominate this thread as one of the best original prophetic insights that God has given to me during the nine years long war on this board that I fought vs. His enemies.

In the original post here, I pointed out the truth of God and the Bible that no mainstream media outlet would dare to notice, admit, or publish.

I should have been given a few Noble Prizes for this insight or a similar type of reward. And then I would have thanked God and gave Him the credit for sharing the prophetic insight with me which I in turn shared with all of you.

*pats myself on the back*

Remember darwinists: don't be messing with any serpents' heads like the deceased chef cited in the OP did...or else you will probably be meeting the master behind their power long before you had expected. *pats myself on the back again for all the darwinists' lives who I've saved when I originally made the OP, and/or with the reminder I've just given*

Navaros #fundie imdb.com

I don't obsess about it. But I do declare its truth from time to time in response to atheists/darwinists who try to deny it. And also because I love when evil feminists (and many of the atheists/darwinists here who share feminists' evil ideology) fill themselves with rage at the facts of God's Maleness, God's Kingness, God's Patriarchness, God's Fatherness, and yes, even His Holy Righteous Penis! When they are not busy murdering babies en masse, feminists spend the rest of their time trying to deny those facts of God and replace them with an idol of a false god which is made in their own image: an effeminate, penis-less eunuch god and/or she-god. I'm here to say, "No, you baby murdering psychopaths, the God of the Bible is as real as He's always been, and when you come before His Judgement Seat just before He forever sends you to burn in Hell, then you will have to face HIM in ALL of HIS MALE PATRIARCH KING FATHER HOLY RIGHTEOUS PENIS-OWNING GLORY!" Praise God. Amen!

Navaros #fundie imdb.com

How is America a completely evil cesspool?

For one thing, it willingly participates in committing the most egregious atrocity/crime against humanity that has ever existed in the history of mankind, by legally murdering hundreds of thousands of babies per year. It glosses over those murders with false label euphemisms designed to pretend as if they are not murders, like "abortion," "women's rights," "right to choose," etc...but just like a rose by any other name is still a rose, legalized mass murders by any other name are still legalized mass murders. Nothing but a completely evil cesspool would do that.

Navaros #fundie imdb.com

Isn't that what heaven is supposedly like? Where everything is perfect and no one can come to harm?

Sure, but keep in mind this question: who is in Heaven?

Answer: the very few people who during their time on earth chose to believe in and obey God (this point is especially what almost no one does) and accept Jesus' payment of their sin debt. That all sounds very simple, but almost no one actually does it.

In other words, the population of Heaven is what we could call in human terms "a biased sample." Only the cream of the crop of the human population gets in, and they got in because they chose to live godly lives.

Now, compare that to the unbiased sample that comprises 99.999999999+% of the humans on the earth who are ungodly. They either proactively hate God, or are indifferent to God. In either case, they fail to obey God, and they commit acts of evil constantly. Those type of people never get into Heaven. And them not being allowed in is one of the main reasons why Heaven is able to be perfect.

"Science creates fictions to explain facts" - Gilman

Navaros #fundie imdb.com

Although hitler used darwinist principles to the 'T', I personally have never used any hitler arguments against darwinism solely because it undermines the fact that darwinists are perpetuating their own holocaust right now, and have been for decades, and their holocaust is even worse than hitler's. That holocaust is called 'abortion'. By using the hitler argument, IMO it makes it seem like we only need to worry about the other nefarious things darwinism will lead to and giving the impression that 'everything is fine and dandy right now regarding darwinism'; whilst ignoring darwinists' current crimes against humanity.

So for those reasons, I agree that there are better arguments to be made than the hitler argument. Such as that darwinism leads to the barbaric butchering of babies, right now.

Navaros #fundie imdb.com

Well, how about my theory as to why: feminism has rotted atheist/darwinist brains, so therefore, they believe that God must be a she-god or eunuch god, because to a brain rotted by feminism, she-gods and eunuch gods are "normal" and "not funny at all,"... but a Male God who is a Father, King, and who has a Penis is "not normal" and "the most hilarious thing ever!"

By the way, I wonder if when atheists pray to their eunuch god, they ever ask him: "how did you get cut?"

Even if God's Penis is "funny," it's nowhere near as funny as is the atheists' penis-less eunuch god!

Navaros #fundie imdb.com

In fact, reading a Chick Tract and taking it to heart and then reading a Bible afterwards (with a sincere heart, that is) is the very best thing you could possibly do in your life right now.

Navaros #fundie imdb.com

"Elliot Rodger, Christian"

No he wasn't. He committed Onanism and he also wanted to fornicate. Those are not Christian traits.

I haven't heard of most of the people on your list, but the fact that you lie about that guy being a Christian is enough to prove your whole list is bull.

And even if your whole list was true, that would still be a drop in the bucket compared to the ~2 billion+ that your kind has murdered and continues to murder in the 'abortion' holocaust.

Navaros #fundie imdb.com

"Why is God male?"

Because He is. That's like saying "why am I female?" or "why is my mother female?" or "why is my father male?"

"Does he have male genitalia?"

Of course He does.

"It seems silly for the creator of the universe to have a wang and yet not have a female"

That's because you are thinking of God in dirty, worldly, fleshy terms. God's Member does not conform to those debased forms of thought.

Navaros #fundie imdb.com

Don't forget that many blacks often murder their own children via 'abortion.' But you won't see any of the racist clowns from "Black Lives Matter" ever talk about that, because they obviously don't really care about black lives.

Navaros #fundie imdb.com

[on "Law & Order: Criminal Intent")

Some years ago I watched a few episodes of this show and then they aired an episode that was nothing more than sickening pro-abortion propaganda. After that disgusting piece of crap, I stopped watching this show.

The other day I was flicking through the channels and I thought I happened upon a made-for-TV mafia movie or something. I like mafia movies so I figured: "Ok, let's see what this is." Then I found out it was this show.

I was shocked though when after the credits instead of seeing Vincent D'Onofrio with dashing young moviestar-like good looks, I saw what looked to be a totally different person entirely. Vincent D'Onofrio has become an ugly, fat old slob!

Likewise, Kathryn Erbe now looks like a haggard witch.

My theory as to why these actors' looks both got totally shot to Hell is that it is the sin of them making pro-abortion propaganda catching up with them and manifesting itself physically in their now-hideous looks.

Navaros #fundie imdb.com

[The actress Melissa (Joan Hart), who makes no secret of her strong commitment to Christianity]

That's pretty odd coming from a woman who willingly agreed to pose in sexually provocative ways for Maxim magazine, knowing full-well that the idea behind doing that was to encourage its male readers to indulge in Onanism to images of her.

That's not something a woman with a "strong commitment to Christianity" would do.

Navaros #fundie imdb.com

darwinists think playing dungeons and dragons is cool. In fact, they often plagiarize dungeons and dragons by stating that there are multiple universes and this is just one of billions of universes, therefore that is how darwinism can be true.

Yes, although it's just nonsense fantasy in dungeons and dragons, darwinists have taken that and turned it into a crackpot idea that they actually, truly believe is part of real-life.

I can't even begin to tell you how many dozens of times I've seen darwinists advocating that crackpot, dungeons and dragons plagiarized idea on the Expelled board.

Just goes to show once again that darwinists are batty.

Navaros #fundie imdb.com


Everyone has a religion and a god. Yours religion is atheism and your god is nature, albeit a false version of nature, one based on the fabrications darwinists make about nature which give it powers that it does not have in reality.

Navaros #fundie imdb.com

[No one thinks Darwin is a god.]


Yet darwinists glorify his name, build gigantic statues/graven images/idols of him, write letters to him despite the fact that he is long dead and frying in Hell, celebrate him with a special holiday, perpetuate his myths endlessly in every medium possible, and try to silence anyone who speaks against him or the mythology he invented.

If they don't think that he is a god, why do they treat him like a god in all of those ways?

Navaros #fundie imdb.com

Darwinists will always be on a never-ending wild goose chase - with no proof whatsoever for any of their outlandish claims - because they are trying to fit the reality of what happened at the dawn of time in our Universe into a box that it cannot ever fit into.

Since the Universe and life in it were not, in reality, created by natural processes, it will never be possible to legitimately explain either the origin or diversity of life, or the Universe, using natural processes. There will never be any testable, repeatable, or observable evidence for the outlandish claims of Darwinism/evolution, because that reality has never actually existed, other than in the hearts and minds of Darwinists.

Darwinists are puzzled about why they haven't truly won and never will. They don't understand why the controversy remains despite them having insidiously infested every area of educational institutions and media; having a veritable monopoly to become propagandists and promote their opinions as 'facts' to everyone with inescapable, relentless bombardments of it at every turn. What is stated in the above paragraphs is the reason their endless Darwinist propaganda ultimately fails on enlightened persons, (although sadly, it does 'succeed' in socially engineering many to believe in Darwinism/evolution ) several decades after Darwinists though they had won. It is the reason why Darwinists can never truly win, and achieve a 100% belief rate/hivemind; which they wish and strive for.

Bottomline: You CANNOT legitimately - or with any proof - explain the origin or diversity of life & the Universe with natural processes since natural processes were not used to create it. So just stop trying.

The fear of the LORD is the beginning of knowledge,But fools despise wisdom and instruction.

Navaros #sexist imdb.com

Title of the posting: How come there are no women in this "all-female" Ghostbusters?

I've read that that this will be an "all-female" Ghostbusters.

I've seen a couple of publicity photos for this film.

In those photos, I did not see a single woman.

All I saw were four or so butt-ugly, monstrous, masculine brutes.

Does it not stand to reason that an "all-female" Ghostbusters should actually have women in it?

Someone messed up there, big-time!

Navaros #fundie imdb.com

Then wonder no longer, because I will tell you right now: no larger nor more evil scum exists in this world than does the legion of baby-murdering feminists, and every time I declare the facts of God's statuses as King, Father, Patriarch, Male, Masculine and with His Almighty Holy Righteous Penis...those baby-murdering feminists boil with rage! That alone warrants frequent and jubilant declarations of the facts of God's Penis!

And the even bigger benefit is yet to come: those same baby-murdering feminists will have to kneel before Him and His Glorious Penis while they face Him at His Judgement Seat and have to account to Him for their evils, right before His Holy, Righteous Penis smacks them upside their heads and knock them into the lake of fire in Hell!

To summarize that more shortly, I love talking about God's Penis mainly because evildoers hate hearing about God's Penis! And also because I love justice, and It is the Tool of Deliverance for said justice to the most evil scum who has ever defaced the face of the earth, namely, baby-murdering feminists! Praise God! Amen!

In addition, I also have to talk about God's Penis a lot to pick up the slack of everyone else who neglects to talk about It because they are afraid of offending feminist monsters! I have to do my own work, and also the work that they should be doing, but aren't!

By the way Nat, you yourself corroborate everything I say, every time your new posts fail to acknowledge the fact of God's Penis, and instead your new posts continue to spout the she-god strawmen and/or the he/she god strawman. That makes me think you are terrified of God's Penis for the same reasons I've outlined above! If you want to prove me wrong, then do so in your next post by admitting the fact that God is a He with a Holy, Righteous Penis!

Prove

Navaros #fundie imdb.com

There is no such thing as "creationists" as distinct from "Christians." All Christians believe the Bible, and therefore all Christians know that God is Male and has a Penis.

Anyone who denies those facts would be a denier of the Bible, and therefore, by definition, not a Christian..

Navaros #fundie imdb.com

I say that a lot lately because I know this board will be closing soon and I want to remind - so that they never forget - the feminist demon monster scum (that group also includes male darwinists) who spend their lives on earth trying to undermine God's Kingliness, Fatherliness, Masculineness, Maleness, Patriarchness - and yes, they even pretend that He has no Penis - of exactly Who, meaning the Gigantic-Penis-Wielding Sovereign of the Universe - they will be facing when they expire from this earth and then have to account for the King of Kings for all the babies they've murdered while on earth, and other such atrocities.

Navaros #fundie imdb.com

No, God's Penis is not a biological organ. I never said God's Penis was the same as man's penis. Obviously it wouldn't be. That is why I pointed out God has a Holy, Righteous Penis. That is to say, it's not the same as man's corrupted, fleshy one.

As I said when this subject first came up, once again: Penises are not just for sex & peeing. It is only because man is evil that he thinks of penises exclusively in those terms.

Man is made in the image of God the Father. That is the primary reason why man has a penis.

You cannot insert your evil prejudicial ideas of man's penis onto God - which is exactly what you are doing. God's Penis is not equal to man's penis. It's really not hard to understand.

Navaros #fundie imdb.com

Hi darwinists,

Since IMDB is shutting down its boards, I will no longer be able to educate you about your need to repent from your evil, renounce your faith in darwinism, accept the Bible including God's historical account of Creation in Genesis, accept Jesus' blood as proxy payment for your sin debt, stop defending evil, start defending righteousness...and as a result of all that, go to Heaven instead of to Hell.

So I made this thread as a final reminder to you to do what I just said for the sake of your own best interests and also to make the world a better place by virtue of you no longer spreading evils.

If you fail to take that advice, then the next time we meet may be many decades from now, when I am in Heaven and partying with God, and you are in Hell and wishing you weren't, and asking me for help...but I will no longer be able to help you at that point, because the rift between Heaven and Hell is impassable, and once you are in Hell, no escape from it is possible.

Choosing Heaven is much better, so do that! Then we can meet again there and party together!

I know my fans love when I enlighten them about the facts of God's Holy, Righteous Penis...and I also know that God's Holy, Righteous Penis is the One Thing that terrifies feminists more than anything else, because they know they will have to confront and kneel before It when they come before God's Judgement Seat...right before He casts them into Hell forever as Justice for the babies that they have murdered and/or the support they offered for their fellow monsters who have murdered their babies. I wouldn't be surprised if God smacked His Holy, Righteous Penis upside every feminist's demented head in order to knock it [it meaning the entirety of the feminist monster...they are "its," not "shes"] out of His Judgement Chamber and down into Hell. What better way could there be?

For you darwinists who want to choose Heaven over Hell, I leave you with these sites as guidance:

http://crev.info/
http://www.evolutionfairytale.com/
https://answersingenesis.org/
https://arkencounter.com/
https://creationmuseum.org/
http://creationism.org/

Your other guidance is the King James Bible, joining a Bible-believing church*, and God Himself and/or His Son, Jesus, and/or the Holy Spirit which you will acquire inside of you if and when you sincerely repent from evil and become born again.

*But you can't just join any church...most churches that exist today are fake, apostate houses of Satan.

One telltale ways to know if a church is Bible-believing or not is to ask whether they call themselves 'catholic' and/or whether they worship a pope ["pope" is a synonym for "Satan's #1 henchman"]. If the answer to either of those is "yes," then they are not a Bible-believing church.

A second telltale way to know if a church is Bible-believing or not is to ask them if they believe evolution is true. If they say anything other than "no," then they are not a Bible-believing church. Conversely, if they do say "no," then they are probably a Bible-believing church. You can also ask them how long God spent creating the world and all life in it. If their answer is anything more than "seven days" and/or "one week," then they hate God, Jesus Christ, and the Bible.

If you meet a fake, apostate house of Satan masquerading as a Christian church, run away. Don't even think about joining it, because it leads straight to Hell, just the same as your old path of full-fledged darwinism did.

Farewell darwinists. Good luck to those of you who choose to repent and move onto the path to Heaven, I hope to see you there later!

Navaros #fundie imdb.com

The Bible is for all of human history. Therefore, it is impossible to "read it in historical context" in the way in which you imply it should be. You are implying that the Bible is only applicable to a certain limited time frame in the past, and one which you and the other blasphemers of your ilk have arbitrarily chosen to suit the agenda of the anti-biblical messages that you want to push.

Navaros #fundie imdb.com

What kind of immoralities are you talking about?

As examples, godly people are against the following immoralities:

- Fornication
- Onanism
- Using illegal drugs
- Using foul language
- Taking the LORD's name in vain
- Murdering babies via 'abortion'
- Murdering babies via 'stem cell research'
- Murdering the disabled and/or elderly via 'euthanasia'
- Indoctrinating students with darwinistic beliefs in public schools

Now, contrast that with atheists. atheists are by and large, if not universally, in favor of all of those immoralities.

Navaros #fundie imdb.com

(On the subject of the film "God’s Not Dead")

Before making this post, I revisited this film so that the evil, ungodly things that Josh did are fresh in my mind.

In his first speech, Josh affirms the darwinist-alleged, Bible-denying age of the universe (13.7B years). He also affirms darwinists' big bang theory, whilst adding in front of it the caveat that God did it.

In his third speech, Josh directly affirms that evolution is true and again, adds a God did it caveat in front. He then goes on to make that same affirmation a second time when he validates the darwinist idea that all forms of life transformed into each other over 3.8B years. To that he tacks on another caveat, that within those 3.8B years, evolution happened fast. Next, he inappropriately conflates his ungodly argument with a quotation from Genesis that in reality completely debunks everything that he just said and will continue to say. He finishes with yet another affirmation that the process of evolution is true, and yet again tacks on the caveat but God did it.

In his fourth speech, Josh finally says something compatible with the Bible, by pointing out that evil exists in the world due to God allowing Free Will. However, that fact also completely debunks all the darwin-glorifying, anti-God, anti-Christian, anti-Bible propaganda which he spouted previously. To wit, if evolution is true, then evil is necessarily not a consequence of Free Will, but rather, evil must always have existed in the world, long before any sentient beings who had Free Will did. Moreover, that of course would point to an evil god, who must have put evil into the world without justification, for no reason other than because he too is evil (that would be a satanic god, not the God of the Bible).

Given all that evidence, there is no reasonable way you can possibly legitimately argue that Josh didn't glorify darwin and affirm evolution and thereby deny God, the Bible and Christianity.

Navaros #fundie imdb.com

Don't thank me because you decided by your own volition to entrench yourself further into the darwinist brainwashing machine and not care that when you die you will have to give an account to God, Whom controls your eternal destiny, for spending your life rejecting what He said. That's all on you, I have nothing to do with it. In fact, I encourage you to do the exact opposite of all that. I reject your thanks. You are not welcome to thank me for that.

If you ever wanna thank me for something, then first you must get yourself deprogrammed out of your darwinist mindset, start going to a Bible-believing Church, start reading the Bible and praying to God every day. Do all of that with sincerity. Then after you've done all those things for a few months, there is no doubt you will come to realize the error of (what would then become) your old ways, renounce darwinism, and know your eternal destiny is secure. All that would be the very best thing you would ever do in your entire existence.

If you do all those things, then you may come afterwards and thank me, and I will gladly accept your thanks.

The fear of the LORD is the beginning of knowledge,But fools despise wisdom and instruction.

Navaros #fundie forum.dune2k.com

Akriku: the problem with your babbling in the original post is that evidence itself is subjective

tell me: you believe in carbon-dating? if a scientist says that a rock is 50 million years old and he has "proven" that by carbon-dating, would you believe him? would you believe he has proved it?

if so - then you are believing him based on FAITH in the idea of carbon-dating. you do not KNOW that the rock is as old as he claims it is. but based on faith in an idea - that is what determines whether or not you accept something as valid "evidence" or not

this principle is not limited to the example i've used. for almost anything that you state which contradicts religious texts - i could PROVE to you how your statement has NOT been proven with evidence - but rather is based on faith and speculation on your part.

Navaros #fundie imdb.com


Actually, darwinists like miller are the ones who lied at the trial, such as by saying that 'evolution can be proven wrong.' darwinists will never accept evolution as wrong because when irrefutable evidence that proves it wrong, like soft tissue in t-rex, comes out, they just tell more lies about it to say pretend evolution is true.

darwinists have also lied at other court trials and to the public for decades. The whole history of evolutionism is based on nothing but lies by darwinists, and those lies presented as 'facts.' I.e. Piltdown Man fraud/hoax was propagated by darwinists for over 40 years!!! And darwinists lied in court such as at the Scopes trial to use that fraud to 'prove' that evolution is true.

And that's just one of many of darwinists frauds/lies/hoaxes. Here's a bunch of others: ida darwinus, lucy, nebraska man, java man, neanderthal man, cromagnon man, peking man, nutcracker man, archaeopteryx, tiktaalik, 'vestigal' organs, 'junk' dna, soft tissue in t-rex, haeckel's fraudulent drawings etc. etc

They lied again at dover also by saying that similiarity in a genome means that apes transformed into men.

darwinists got nothing but lies.

darwinists are the kings of liars.

Navaros #fundie imdb.com

There is no "debate." "Abortion" is cold-blooded, brutal murder, period. And there is no such thing as "abortion." When you say "abortion," you are using that word as a euphemism for "murdering babies." Murderers should indeed be ashamed of themselves. And "women" would not ever murder their own babies, so you are incorrect also when you use the word "women" as a euphemism for "murderers."

Navaros #fundie imdb.com

[A christian about YEC's: "but in my experience the YEC care more about defending their postion on the age of the earth than they do about core Christianity."]

You are an evil apostate, so it would be very unwise to take your experience as a good example of anything.

The core of Christianity is obediance to God. Instead of obeying God, you geode spend your life working iniquity against Him by calling Him a liar and His Word a lie, attacking His people, replacing His Word with the ungodly evolution fairytale, fraternizing with other evil men who agree with you (trying to delude yourself for psychological comfort that evil others telling you your apostasy is fine and dandy will make it ok with God) and promoting that satanic viewpoint to naive people so that they may be led astray and join you in Hell.

If you knew the slightest thing about core Christianity, geode, then you would be terrified of what God will do to such a worker of iniquity as yourself at the Judgement Seat of Christ. "The fear of the LORD is the beginning of knowledge, but fools despite wisdom and instruction". That could have been written for you specifically, geode. That you revel in your debauchery instead of falling on your knees, begging for forgiveness, and repenting, is empirical proof that you are not of God.

Navaros #fundie imdb.com


How about:

atheist beliefs in darwinism.
atheist beliefs in murdering babies.
atheist beliefs in murdering the severely handicapped by slow starvation and dehydration (i.e. Terri Schiavo).
atheists beliefs in stalking and theft (most atheists who are on IMDB do these things)
atheist beliefs in hating, silencing and personally attacking anyone who opposes their viewpoints.
atheist beliefs in space aliens.
atheist beliefs that george carlin is funny and brilliant.
atheist beliefs that bill maher is brilliant.
atheist beliefs that penn and teller are brilliant.
atheist beliefs in supporting almost every immoral cause that exists.

Almost every atheist, if not every atheist, believes in those things.

It's like the poster said, atheists share tons of common beliefs, many of which are extreme, especially the pro-murder beliefs that atheists have.

Navaros #fundie imdb.com

I was searching around youtube to learn about Julie Andrews. Then I was disgusted to find an interview with her where two guys pointed out that she went topless in a softcore porno film.

If she hadn't have done that, then she would have been remembered forever as a wonderful wholesome lady with a perfect voice.

Since she did do that, now she will be remembered forever as an immoral, filthy, harlot-like woman.

I bet that is why God made her lose her perfect voice. She decided to squander her gift by devolving into Sodom & Gomorrah-like immorality. Her fall is almost exactly like how Lucifer was the most glorifious creature God ever made, but then he became debased into filthy satan.

Navaros #fundie imdb.com


God's truth always turns the ungodly away from religion. Jesus guaranteed that the world will hate His approved workmen just as much as it hated Him.

Receiving hate from the ungodly is a telltale sign that a godly person is an approved workman of God! That's why, for example, all the ungodly posters on here hate KiBL, me, Kirk Cameron, and any & every other Bible-believing a.k.a. true Christian in the world.

The converse is also true: any so-called "Christian" who the world at large does not hate is most definitely not doing God's work, because as we said, God's work guarantees hate against the person who performs it!

Navaros #fundie imdb.com

Science is observable, testable, and repeatable.

On the other hand, your evolution mythology is none of the above. yuk yuk.

By the way, America was founded by Bible-believing Christians called Puritans who accepted the Bible and who rejected your evolution mythology. So if you don't like Bible-believing Christians, then logically you should get the heck out of America right now, and take all of your darwinist ilk with you

Next page